It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קט,א משנה

??? if did he die No. ??? he returns to his children or his brothers? And if he doesn't have ??? obligation shall come ???

דף קט,א גמרא

Rav Yosef said even ??? of justice Rav Pappa said: and it is necessary ??? this ??? why is it that ??? for his own sake who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? to him on ??? and not ??? to him on ??? Perhaps, son of ??? he Rabbi Yochanan said: There is no difficulty. this one Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean this one Rabbi Akiva as it is taught: (Num. 5) and if yes. ??? And so there are a person ??? that do not to him ??? except ??? is what the scripture says. Behold! ??? and "to him has sworn and he heard ??? and it was the case that ??? to Jerusalem ??? upon it ??? did he die took possession ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean R' ??? says he (the possibility of repair if done improperly) does not have until ??? to Rabbi Yosei: the Gallilean there is no difference for his own sake They did not teach this לא שנו to others ??? and to Rebbi ??? They did not teach this לא שנו to others and there is no difference for his own sake he did not find ??? to R' ??? it is the law for even in the case where No. ??? and This case where he teaches ??? upon it ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi ??? that even ??? upon it ??? he (the possibility of repair if done improperly) does not have until ??? He disagreed with this Rav Sheishet If so, to Rabbi Yosei: the Gallilean ??? for his own sake and all the more so to others to Rabbi ??? to others that is not ??? and how much more so for his own sake that is not ??? except Rav Sheshet said this one Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean and thus he comes to say Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean ??? to others but: for his own sake he did not find ??? except why is it that took possession ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? It is because of this: ??? upon it ??? Rava said: this one Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Akiva For he said Rabbi Akiva that is not ??? for his own sake but: to others ???

דף קט,ב גמרא

from this general principle it would follow of R' Yosi the Gallilean reasoned even for his own sake also ??? except ??? for he says the Merciful One ??? to the priests in what way does It concerns itself Rabba said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? ??? and "to him has sworn did he die ??? after death ??? the Name and were given to the priests he is required Ravina ??? the female convert What then? (Num. 5) a man the Merciful One in the Torah says and not a woman or, perhaps, ??? he He said to him: Rav ??? Come and hear: as it is taught: a man yes. for me except a man a woman from where do we learn For as it says: (Num. 5) ??? Behold! here, two If so, Just as Scripture states: a man a man you It is necessary for him ??? after him: if there are to him ??? or not. a child If it was you It is necessary for him ??? after him: in his knowledge that do not to him ??? The rabbis taught: (Num. 5) to Hashem ??? the Name and were given ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) You say ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) Or perhaps, except for all a priest ??? For as it says: (Num. 5) ??? a ram ??? who ??? in it upon it Behold! ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) is what the scripture says. The Rabbis taught Behold! that he was ??? a priest from where do we learn that did not have it is said Because and he goes out to the priests Consider this case: he under the hands of ??? mine It would be a logical inference If it was ??? others he he merits ??? himself not all the more so? Rabbi Natan says ??? after for just as a thing that do not to him a portion in it until ??? It is impossible ??? a thing in which there is to him a portion in it before it was even the case that ??? shall enter is it not logical ??? after It is possible ??? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? In the matter that do not to him a portion in it ??? that do not to him a portion in it thus in the same way yes. to others a portion in it shall you say ??? in which there is to him a portion in it thus in the same way there are to others a portion in it except ??? he would exit ??? for all ??? the priests. For it is written (Num. 5) a man ??? to him ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? tamei If it was ??? tamei a thing in which there is to him a portion in it who it has except We come to compare ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 27) ??? Just as Scripture states: from where do we learn ??? to the priests with the Jubilee ??? one from the priests. from where do we learn that did not have it is said Because ??? to the priests with the Jubilee Consider this case: She under the hands of shall be mine It would be a logical inference ??? others I he merits ??? not all the more so? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) ??? the ban" ??? are his and This is not are his How so? ??? for all ??? The rabbis taught: from where do we learn ??? ??? came in all a time and with all hour ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Deut. 18) came in all ??? your soul ??? and Awake, are his Therefore, scripture states: (Num. 5) a man ??? to him ??? How so? if he was the master of ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? and Awake, are his

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.