It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קי,א גמרא

and if he was an elderly person or an ill person ??? for all a priest ??? and Awake, ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) This an elderly person or an ill person How so? If it was ??? does he act? the blessing of the Service ??? and Awake, also ??? that are his and if that is not ??? does he act? the blessing of the Service ??? in what way does ??? Rav Pappa said: that it is possible to do by way of lit., through the hands of ??? the blessing of the Service and so when does he act? for him by way of lit., through the hands of ??? the blessing of the Service She ??? food and so when ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? food that is large She and food that is large Is this not anything he It is because of this: thus ??? and Awake, ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) Rav Sheshet said if he was a priest tamei ??? community ??? for all who ??? and Awake, ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) How so? If it was That there are ??? who ??? my slave and if ??? and Awake, ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) this one ??? and not ??? Rabba said: I would say ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) Rav Ashi said if he was the high priest ??? for all a priest ??? and Awake, ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) And what can we come and learn from this? ??? the high priest ??? and does not he eats and does not ??? to eat ??? I thought to say For ??? the Merciful One upon it ??? The greatness ??? he but: ??? he did not find ??? Come and learn from this.

דף קי,א משנה

??? ??? and "to him has sworn did he die Behold! this must make restitution the principal amount plus a fifth to the priests and a guilt-offering ??? as it is said (Num. 5) and if yes. ??? to Hashem ??? a ram ??? who ??? in it upon it he was ??? ??? and ??? did he die ??? to his children ??? until ??? "and he sold ??? he gave ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) did he die yes. ??? it is possible for them to discharge the mitzvah ??? as it is said (Num. 5) a man who He shall give" ??? to him it shall be he gave ??? and a guilt-offering ??? he has fulfilled his obligation a guilt-offering ??? silver ??? if stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? My son, ??? and if He does not return ??? a guilt-offering after ??? before it was even the case that ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? before it was even the case that ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. he gave ??? and it was not given ??? yes. ??? is essential.

דף קי,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught a guilt-offering this the principal amount ??? this Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Or perhaps, except a guilt-offering this a ram and for what practical distinction To exclude ??? for he said: Raba ??? by night He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. What is the reason מאי טעמא a guilt-offering ??? the Merciful One For as it says: ??? a ram ??? you shall says a guilt-offering this the principal amount Another teaching a guilt-offering this the principal amount ??? this Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth Or perhaps, except a guilt-offering this Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth for what practical distinction To exclude ??? For it was taught in a baraita he gave to him ??? and it was not given to him ??? yes. ??? is essential. ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth is essential. For as it says: (Num. 5) ??? ??? on its head ??? you shall says a guilt-offering this the principal amount Another teaching a guilt-offering this the principal amount ??? this Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? is what the scripture says. Or perhaps, except ??? this ??? is what the scripture says. For as it says: ??? ??? on its head ??? Behold! ??? on top of lit. on the head of is what the scripture says. Back to the main body of the text: Rabba said: ??? by night He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. What is the reason? a guilt-offering ??? the Merciful One Rabba said: ??? in which is not the value of ??? for all a priest and a priest he has not fulfilled his obligation. Lit., he has not caused his obligation to go out from his hands. What is the reason מאי טעמא As it is written ??? until that it should be ??? for all a priest and a priest he is required Raba yes. in it ??? and there are in it

דף קי,ב גמרא

??? What then? How so? Shall I say ??? this one is in it it is not necessary to teach this ??? What then does it mean when it says who say immediately ??? he and not anything he or, perhaps, immediately that is not Look, for him from the beginning ??? he arises The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Raba priests What then? ??? opposite ??? who say a guilt-offering ??? the Merciful One Just as a guilt-offering yes. they divide a guilt-offering opposite a guilt-offering Even ??? yes. they divide ??? opposite ??? or, perhaps, ??? he he returns ??? a guilt-offering ??? the Merciful One Rav Acha the son of of Raba he would say over to it clearly and explicitly Rabba said: priests yes. they divide ??? opposite ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא a guilt-offering ??? he is required Raba priests ??? are they, or ??? presentations are they, for what practical distinction For example, ??? chametz which the Passover passed over If you say, ??? are they, we were This ??? And if you say ??? presentations are they, gifts he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the Merciful One ??? them Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? he will give them something ??? in reality he Rav ??? he is required thus even if ??? to say ??? gifts are they, this one No. ??? to us ??? gifts the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? them except For ??? to us For example, ??? to him ten ??? tithe or No. ??? are they, As Mar said: ??? the house they are obligated or, perhaps, ??? presentations are they, and we have learnt in a Mishna: the one who purchased ??? to him as a gift is exempt ??? livestock What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: twenty and four presentations the priesthood ??? and to his children and all of them ??? are in the general category and creates an exclusion and A general principle: covenant salt all ??? it is as if is fulfilled lit. is stood up A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: covenant salt all who transgress upon them it is as if transgresses on A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: covenant salt and they are ten in the Holy Temple and four in Jerusalem and ten ??? ten in the Holy Temple A sin-offering livestock and A sin-offering of a bird: and a guilt-offering certainly and a guilt-offering suspended and peace-offerings of community ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at and it is permitted ??? and two ??? and bread ??? and the remnants i.e., leftovers of menuchot offerings: and four in Jerusalem ??? and the portion reserved for the priests from The thangkgiving-offering and a ram a Nazir and skins holy offerings and ten in the borderlands terumah and terumah of tithe ??? and redemption ??? and redemption he exempted a donkey ??? euphemisms for bans ??? a seminal emission Regardless, gifts Learn from this ??? presentations are they, ??? he gave ??? the rotating watch-group (mishmar) ??? Abayye said: Learn from this silver atones ??? For if it was No. atones then I might incorrectly say: he turned ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא with the intent ??? No. He gave for him Except I can object with text from here: a sin-offering whose owner has died Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough ??? No. ??? They said: a sin-offering whose owner has died Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion We have a tradition that to it ??? Except I can object with text from here: a guilt-offering ??? No. ??? a guilt-offering also Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion We have a tradition that to it all ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? before ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough without chalitza ??? No. ??? herself there i.e., in another mishna We ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.