It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קיא,א גמרא

??? it's settled. to it in all ??? for Resh Lakish said: of high quality ??? he gave ??? The rabbis taught: he gave a guilt-offering ??? silver ??? he returns silver next to a guilt-offering these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. But the sages say: he returns a guilt-offering next to silver How so? Shall I say ??? for him a guilt-offering ??? silver ??? this took possession ??? and this took possession ??? Rabba said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? a guilt-offering ??? silver ??? R' Yehudah reasoned immediately ??? She ??? for him Therefore, he returns silver next to a guilt-offering And the rabbbis reason that that did not have ??? he ??? My son, ??? a guilt-offering ??? silver Therefore, ??? them and he shall return a guilt-offering next to silver It was taught: he said Rabbi according to the words of Rabbi Yehudah if ??? My son, ??? and bring offerings ??? he shall return ??? a guilt-offering after ??? My son, ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? They said: for what Look, a guilt-offering is invalid, he Rabba said: ??? It was taught: he said Rabbi according to the words of Rabbi Yehudah if stood i.e., as long as he lived a guilt-offering he returns a guilt-offering next to silver and this one is Rabbi Yehudah he returns silver next to a guilt-offering it has Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? and not ??? But hey, come and learn from this. ??? Another teaching he said Rabbi according to the words of Rabbi Yehudah if stood i.e., as long as he lived a guilt-offering he shall return silver next to a guilt-offering This is obvious! thus it has Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? and not ??? What would you have said? ??? regarding ??? Come and learn from this. ??? immediately that is not ??? before it was even the case that ??? words Rabba said: For scripture said: (Num. 5) ??? to Hashem ??? a ram ??? who ??? in it from this general principle it would follow ??? he said one of the rabbis to Raba Except I can object with text from here: (Num. 28) ??? the morning Here, too, from this general principle it would follow of Musaf ??? For it was taught: from where do we learn that it should not be a thing before ??? of the morning Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 6) ??? upon it The elevation-offering Rabba said: The elevation-offering an elevation-offering the first He said to him: I (Num. 5) ??? in it ??? for him ??? No. ??? he gave to him ??? The Rabbis taught from where do we learn ??? and not ??? and not ??? that did not have he has fulfilled his obligation Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 5) ??? to him And from where do we learn ??? before it was even the case that ??? that did not have he has fulfilled his obligation Therefore, scripture states: ??? It is possible in the same way ??? and a guilt-offering ??? thus in the same way Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth is essential. Therefore, scripture states: ??? to him a ram and a guilt-offering ??? And there is no meaning to the word Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth is essential. ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Just as a guilt-offering for in that place the principal amount Even a guilt-offering ??? the principal amount ??? Just as that which was sanctified for Temple use yes. Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth is essential. Even ??? also yes. Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth is essential.

דף קיא,ב משנה

??? and one may feed his children ??? before them are exempt ??? and if he was a thing in which there is in it liens on they are obligated to make whole

דף קיא,ב גמרא

Rav Chisdah said ??? and not ??? and someone else came and he ate from him running from this ??? running from this ??? What is the reason? all how much that is not ??? he arises We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? and one may feed his children ??? before them are exempt ??? of Rav Chisda Rav would say to you ??? For this teaching after ??? if ??? before them are exempt ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama This one says is a voluntary act ??? the purchaser he is equivalent. Rava said: is a voluntary act ??? Is this not ??? the purchaser he is equivalent. and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, if he was a thing in which there is in it liens on they are obligated to make whole from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? standing is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) He could say to you Raba thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: if ??? to them ??? liens on items of movable property they are obligated to make whole Hey, isn't it the case that he would say over for him Rabbi to Rabbi Shimon the son of No. a thing in which there is in it liens on actually and really except even a cow ??? of it a donkey ??? after him: they are obligated to turn because of honor ??? except Rabba said: For ??? R' Oshaia he departs ??? for it teaches: Rabbi ??? and one may feed his children are exempt ??? before them ??? standing they are obligated yes. ??? standing are exempt ??? to them ??? liens on items of movable property they are obligated to make whole Mar said: yes. ??? standing are exempt Let him say ??? of Rav Chisda Rav would say to you ??? For this teaching after ??? Mar said: ??? standing they are obligated to make whole Let him say ??? son of Chama He could say to you pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama For this teaching

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.