It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קיד,א גמרא

??? They did not say that except in a case one but: it is dealing with a case where there are two No. and one also They did not say that except in a case ??? but: among ??? we do not have also one ??? for him Rav Ashi said For I was in among Rav Huna ??? to us a person ??? upon it ??? two ??? and not It was necessary for him ??? or, perhaps, immediately ??? he he did not find ??? them ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Rav Ashi said This son of Israel ??? for him the land some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? a thing Israel ??? for him What is the reason? If you were to say It is because of this: judgement a thing ??? For didn't Master, say ??? there is not in this case. It is because of this: judgement a thing ??? except ??? for him ??? for me a lion ??? for him until ??? upon it all ???

דף קיד,א משנה

they brought ??? ??? and were given to him a donkey after they brought ??? ??? and were given to him ??? Behold! these are his because of ??? from ??? or from ??? or from ??? if ??? Behold! these are his and thus ??? of ??? if ??? Behold! these are his that R' Yochanan said son of ??? she is believed a woman or a child to say from here he has fulfilled his obligation ??? this walking in the midst of field his fellow ??? ??? and if ??? must make restitution Just as ??? but not ??? ??? in order to give ??? R' Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? says Even ??? he gives ???

דף קיד,א גמרא

a Tanna taught: if he took it, he turns ??? that are the first his reasoning is ??? so that No. ??? and from the beginning ??? he came ??? and there are that they said if came to turn he returns ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? so that ??? If it was he said If it was ??? that is not mine he turns ??? Behold! these are his because of ??? Rav Ashi said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: gentiles but: ??? Israel No. reasoned tomorrow ??? for him ??? Rav Yosef disagreed ??? some texts read: worshippers of the stars and contellations some texts read: a gentile ??? No. ??? Israel immediately that they said ??? except If it was said ??? it was said: ??? and from bandits if ??? yes. ??? No. They did not teach such a ruling except some texts read: worshippers of the stars and contellations some texts read: gentiles It is because of this: ??? but: ??? Israel immediately that they said ??? It was taught there: skins of the master of the house ??? and of ??? yes. ??? of a thief yes. ??? and of ??? Rabbi Shimon says: ??? the things of a thief ??? of ??? yes. ??? on account of that did not have ??? Ulla said It is a disagreement ??? but: in his knowledge the words of all are ??? Rava said: in his knowledge also It is a disagreement He said to him Abaye ??? No. ??? upon it because of Ulla For it was taught in a baraita ??? on account of that did not have ??? The reason is that is not ??? but: ??? Behold! these are his He said to him: We on account of that do not ??? we learn to it We have learnt in a Mishna: they brought ??? etc. with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis it is a problem a thief If it was Rabbi Shimon it is a problem ??? This is satisfactory ??? for he said: in his knowledge ??? Here in this case, also, in his knowledge and the words of all are except ??? for he said: in his knowledge also It is a disagreement So, with whom does it agree? No. rabbis and not Rabbi Shimon ??? and It is Rabbi Shimon If so, we were a thief two kinds of a thief Come and hear: ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? terumah ??? tithe with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis it is a problem a thief If it was Rabbi Shimon it is a problem ??? This is satisfactory ??? for he said: in his knowledge ??? Here in this case, also, in his knowledge and the words of all are She except ??? for he said: in his knowledge also It is a disagreement So, with whom does it agree? No. rabbis and not Rabbi Shimon Here in this case, also, ??? and R' Shimon She If so, we were a thief two kinds of a thief And if you like, I could say this one ??? Rabbi She as it is taught: Rabbi he said ???

דף קיד,ב גמרא

??? to us ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rabbi says says I ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? is a law established by the Rabbis he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and not ??? or, perhaps, ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? Come and hear: they brought ??? and etc. with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis it is a problem a thief If it was Rabbi Shimon it is a problem ??? If you say, This is satisfactory Rabbi ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi She It is because of this: thus ??? except If you say, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and not ??? So, with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi and not Rabbi Shimon and not rabbis ??? and It is Rabbi Shimon If so, we were a thief two kinds of a thief Come and hear: ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? terumah ??? tithe with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis it is a problem a thief If it was Rabbi Shimon it is a problem ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: It is because of this: thus ??? except If you say, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis So, with whom does it agree? ??? and It is Rabbi Shimon If so, we were a thief two kinds of a thief Rav Ashi said to him ??? Come and hear: ??? Rabbi to Rabbi Shimon the son of No. a thing in which there is in it liens on actually and really except even a cow ??? of it a donkey ??? after him: they are obligated to turn because of honor ??? The reason is because of honor ??? this one Is this not honor ??? No. Learn from this Rabbi a thief ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? and thus ??? of ??? What then does it mean when it says and thus thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: even ??? of ??? is a law established by the Rabbis he For it might have entered your mind that I would say: This immediately is a law established by the Rabbis in reality he ??? for him even ??? also ??? Come and learn from this. if ??? yes. If it was No. ??? that R' Yochanan said son of ??? she is believed a woman and a child ??? a woman and a child My son, giving witness ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, that were ??? after them and the woman and a child ??? on account of ??? And it is said: from here he has fulfilled his obligation ??? this Rav Ashi said yes. ??? on account of ??? is valid except ??? a woman only. He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi and not Consider this case: ??? of ??? on account of ??? he that I ??? of ??? is a law established by the Rabbis he a law established by the Torah No. For didn't Rav Yehudah say Shmuel said It once happened ??? one that he was ??? on account of ??? And it is said: ??? that I the infant ??? on ??? of Abba ??? from the house of ??? ??? to eat from terumah ??? And Rabbi ??? would conclude of it thus and my fellow ??? from me they were read ??? Yochanan he eats ??? Rabbi into the priesthood on his mouth from terumah is a law established by the Rabbis ??? a law established by the Torah No. Hey, isn't it the case that When Rav Dimi came Rav said ??? And there are those who say it was Rav Acha ??? It once happened came before Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi And there are those who say it was It once happened came before Rabbi ??? one that he was ??? on account of ??? and he said I and Ami ??? to among ??? some texts read: the gentiles ??? water ??? on Ami ??? pieces of wood ??? on Ami ??? Rabbi on his mouth into the priesthood ??? but not ??? ??? It was taught: R' Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah says ??? a court בית דין he that it should be descends ??? field of his fellow ??? of his fellow ??? ??? take he is equivalent. ??? from the midst of ??? of his fellow ??? a court בית דין he that it should be poured And this is like the position ??? ??? of his fellow take he is equivalent. And this is like the position from the midst of ??? of his fellow ??? a court בית דין he that it should be ??? its wood ??? of his fellow take he is equivalent. its wood from the midst of ??? of his fellow ??? thus ??? Joshua to Israel the land

דף קיד,ב משנה

??? its implements ??? in the hand of after and went out to him in that place ??? in the city shall vow to him the purchaser how much he gave and wash And if not, Is this not all ??? for I say ??? after ??? this from him

דף קיד,ב גמרא

And so he has fulfilled his obligation to him in that place ??? in the city What then does it mean when it says you shall ??? perhaps, ??? This is only in the case ??? lest R' Yehudah said: Rav said For example, ??? people in the midst of his house and he stood ??? by night and he said ??? how much more so ??? he found Rav Kahana would conclude of it in the name of Rav For example, ??? in the midst of his house and people ??? in the midst of his house they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? of vessels on ??? The entirety say ??? its implements of so-and-so and Perhaps vessels are they, books No. are they, Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said For example, ??? also books ??? Perhaps ??? R' Yosi said son of ??? so-and-so so-and-so and Perhaps are they, ??? that is new Rav said For example, that they said ??? its implements of so-and-so ??? of so-and-so And who said it? Rav thus For didn't Rav say came ??? and he took vessels and went out is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא for the value ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? originally ??? but: Behold! immediately that is not ??? did not say Raba They did not teach such a ruling except the master of the house ??? to sell its implements but: the master of the house that is not ??? to sell its implements

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.