It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קטו,א גמרא

It is not necessary ??? upon it all this and Perhaps It is necessary to teach this for him ??? Rav Ashi said Behold! he has fulfilled his obligation to him in that place ??? it was said: ??? and after this ??? Rav in the name of Rabbi Chiyya he said justice. with ??? R' Yochanan in the name of Rabbi ??? he said justice. with the second Rav Yosef said does not disagree here, before ??? justice. with the second here, after ??? justice. with ??? both of them. there is for them of Rav Chisda He said to him Abaye and does not disagree this one presentations the priesthood ??? he is equivalent. ??? For it was taught in a baraita He said to him: ??? for me ??? of a cow they were of them presentations ??? and does not ??? to him from ??? from him ??? to him from ??? And Rav says They did not teach such a ruling except ??? for himself but: ??? to him ??? justice. with ??? I would say Even judgement with ??? What would you have said? yes. presentations the priesthood ??? Come and learn from this. ??? for he said: ??? in what way ??? Rav ??? he said For example, ??? in the hand of the purchaser and not ??? in the hand of ??? In this case, ??? one master reasons that ??? and after this who changes is a voluntary act ??? who changes is a voluntary act and after this ??? No. ??? there is no difference Rav Papa said, ??? does not disagree ??? and here in this other case, ??? in it well-being of ??? what they disagree about Rav in the name For R' Chiyya he said justice. with ??? judgement ??? and not they make in it well-being of ??? and R' Yochanan It is because of this: For R' ??? he said justice. with the second judgement ??? the house "and they shall make in it well-being of ??? reasoned Rav No. they make in it well-being of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Huna ??? of Rav it was. ??? that is evil ??? he came in front For Rav Huna He said to him to this some a person ??? Sarai ??? that I ??? that is evil immediately ??? of him ??? he is equivalent. Rabba said: if ??? he No. they make in it well-being of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? that is evil ??? it was. "and they shall make in it well-being of ??? No. ??? it was said: ??? No. they make in it well-being of ??? that they said No. with the intent ??? for him something ??? in a case where there are one hundred they make in it well-being of ??? the value of ??? Ameimar he said No. they make in it well-being of ??? Mar Zutra he said they make in it well-being of ??? they make in it well-being of ??? the value of ??? they make in it well-being of ??? the value of hundred ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said No. they make in it well-being of ??? Rava said: they make in it well-being of ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion in all of them they make in it well-being of ??? for there to be wheat ??? son of ??? of Ravina it was. ??? a person four ??? We come to compare ??? four ??? he came in front of Ravina he said ??? and it does not require ??? for him and not something ??? four ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? He disagreed with this Rav a priest and Perhaps ??? ??? and four ??? so that thus it will be ??? from the beginning ??? the validity it arrived in front of Rabbi Abihu he said Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? a priest ??? He went ??? for there to be wheat ??? in a case where there are one hundred ??? Abayye said: ??? He gave for him for there to be wheat ??? and it comes son of ??? He disagreed with this Raba now the purchaser ??? they make in it well-being of ??? the purchaser ??? except Rabba said: ??? Master ??? and he will give for him for there to be wheat ??? hundred ??? ???

דף קטו,א משנה

this came ??? of wine and this came ??? of honey ??? of honey and he poured it this And this is like the position and delivered the honey to its midst

דף קטו,ב משנה

he (except) does not have his worth and if he said ??? ??? And you, he gives for me he is equivalent. mine he is liable to give to him ??? and a donkey his fellow are his proper a maneh worth one hundred dinars and of his fellow two hundred ??? this are his and delivered of his fellow he (except) does not have his worth and if He said to him: I ??? ??? And you, he gives for me mine he is liable to give to him

דף קטו,ב גמרא

But why? Let us say, for him ??? who was not taught? Behold! that he was required so that wine and jars of oil and he saw that are ??? he does not say Behold! this terumah ??? on fruits in which there is for me in the midst of my house. and if he said did not say anything ??? the house of ??? winds upon it So, here, ??? the house of ??? winds upon it and if he said did not say anything For it was taught: who on the way came and coins in his hand ??? opposite him he does not say Behold! fruits in which there is for me in the midst of my house. ??? on coins ??? and if he said his words ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? If it was ??? initially why is it that he does not say ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? and all in a case That there are ??? initially he does not say For it was taught: Behold! that were to him ten ??? of he immersed tamei and he saw One from them ??? or ??? says Behold! She terumah of tithe on nine ??? and with oil No. may he do it? thus because of ??? a priest Thus said Rabbi ??? the house of ??? winds upon it This is satisfactory ??? except ??? for what ??? And if you would say ??? For it was taught: water ??? Behold! this No. ??? in a public domain and not ??? of them ??? and not ??? of them the house and not ??? from them his animal and not ??? his fellow that passed over is to it ??? as it is taught: ??? there is It is because of this: ??? he said Rabbi ??? when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case ??? it is revealed but: at a time i.e., in a case ??? it is covered even though ??? it is revealed there is not there It is because of this: ??? on account of ??? of a snake ??? in his place Is this not it was said: He ascended Thus said Rabbi ??? They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? but: ??? is forbidden there i.e., in another mishna also ??? something ??? for him And Rabbi ??? who ??? For it was taught: ??? from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? and from ??? on ??? but not from ??? on ??? R' ??? says Even from ??? on ??? they did not permit ??? except ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Here in this case, also, ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed Mar said: and with oil No. may he do it? thus because of ??? a priest what is the difference here, oil ??? wine also ??? And if you say ??? Is this not the validity She For didn't Shmuel say It is because of this: Rabbi Chiyya they drink ??? in two, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? will come of him. to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? oil also will come of him. to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? in a vessel ??? wine also he would place for him in a vessel ??? now ??? he is required for him in a vessel ??? he would place for him ??? herself ??? She as it is taught: ??? of wine of terumah Watch out for leading vav And that which became tamei, The academy of Shammai say:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.