It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קטז,א גמרא

??? The entirety And the academy of Hillel say shall you do ??? he said R' Yishmael ??? I ??? in the house of shall you do ??? and in the field ??? The entirety that it is possible that they said ??? shall you do ??? The entirety They said to him: yes. ??? the third ??? if He said to him: ??? ??? why is it that And let him say for him ??? I about You who was not taught? Behold! that he was ??? from the house of incarceration it was ??? before him He said to him: ??? he (except) does not have his worth Perhaps, He said to him: ??? I about You Here in this case, also, Let us say, for him ??? I about You this one No. he is equivalent. except ??? and if He said to him: ??? this ??? he gives to him his worth must make restitution What is different about the beginning of the teaching, And what is different about the end of the teaching he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? fish from the sea And he said to him: ??? river ??? and a donkey his fellow are his proper a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard the first there i.e., in another mishna he and so when ??? he will give for him he is equivalent. completely It is because of this: ??? But here, in this case, ??? Let him say he (except) does not have his worth and if we had heard at the end of the teaching, Here in this case, he ??? he (except) does not have his worth It is because of this: ??? but: there i.e., in another mishna ??? I would say even ??? he will give for him he is equivalent. All of it Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rav Kahana brought this very question ??? He descended ??? He ascended are his upon it. What then? He said to him ??? upon it This is like of Rav ??? it was. ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? This certain individual lion, all ??? for him wine; ??? For it arrived ??? of Rav ??? for him wine; and not ??? Rav ??? took possession of him. He said to him Rav Acha ??? what is the purpose according to him ??? of him. ??? and so when ??? with the intent ??? with the intent ??? No. ??? He said to him Rav ??? he ??? Rav brought this very question ??? He descended ??? and not delivered What then? He said to him: -- this refers to ??? he (except) does not have his worth ??? ???

דף קטז,ב גמרא

??? he has walked and they found ??? or ??? he gives to him his worth must make restitution He said to him who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna does he act? ??? Here in this case, No. does he act? ??? The Rabbis taught ??? in the wilderness and he stood upon it ??? "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." on account of money or property And there is no meaning to the word "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." on account of souls and if his worth ??? One who walks before them "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." Even on account of souls and not ??? for all of who ??? to him ??? to him a donkey after ??? We do not board that did not have ??? to him and if he said ??? for me and as for me, ??? yes. ??? to him This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this is what he has wine; other than this What would you have said? This one comes to ??? for him Come and learn from this. that I ??? of the academy of ??? The Rabbis taught ??? in the sea he stood upon it ??? "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." on account of ??? And there is no meaning to the word "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." on account of money or property and not ??? for all of who Watch out for leading vav or which was lost, to him ??? to him ??? it was lost misplaced to him ??? We do not board that did not have ??? to him and if ??? to the place that do not ??? they walk We do not board This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? one ??? two ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes ??? to the place ??? What would you have said? ??? and took and it comes Come and learn from this. The Rabbis taught ??? in the wilderness and he stood ??? and he stood one from them and delivered delivered ??? and if he said I ??? delivered for himself How so? If it was ??? even at the end of the teaching, also ??? and if that is not It is possible ??? even But the beginning of the teaching, also for himself he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama Here in this case, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) For example, this ??? that did not have with understanding his fellow he said ??? did not say No. ??? Rava said: Here in this case, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? for he said: Rav ??? It is possible ??? in it even ??? the day and how much time is the duration of that is not he returns of him. ??? the house he is equivalent. And so he returns of him. The reason is other than this it is written: (Lev. 25) For for me the Children of Israel slaves and not slaves ??? Rav Ashi said: ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? for himself No. ???

דף קטז,ב משנה

??? field from his fellow ??? if ??? She says to him Behold! ??? before you if ??? he is liable ??? to him field after

דף קטז,ב גמרא

Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said The one who teaches ??? No. ??? and The one who teaches ??? No. ??? The one who teaches ??? No. ??? As it is written (Deut. 28) ??? and The one who teaches ??? No. ??? As it is written (Deut. 28) ??? if ??? How so? Shall I say ??? to the ground that are his and not ??? the entire ??? this one ??? if ??? She etc. If it was No. No. it is not necessary to teach this ??? other than this ??? For example, ??? some texts read: worshippers of the stars and contellations some texts read: gentiles and there are those who say ??? This certain individual ??? There was this guy ??? of the academy of ??? he came in front of Rav ??? Rav ??? Rav Yosef ??? For Rav Huna son of Chiyya ??? Rav Huna son of Chiyya in front of Rav ??? He said to him Rav Huna son of Chiyya for Rav, ??? judgement or ??? He said to him Our mishna She For it was taught in a baraita if ??? he is liable ??? to him field ??? according to ??? He said to him Rav Yosef to Rav Huna. son of Chiyya What then does it mean when it says ??? to you of him

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.