It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יב,א גמרא

??? He said to them ??? Thus said Rabbi Eliezer Even if ??? he said ??? it was. ??? in Nehardaya ??? it was. ??? Rav Channah son of ??? He said to them ??? and if No. ??? Let them go ??? Raba said to him ??? this one ??? this one Rabbi Eliezer this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Channah son of ??? Master, like who he reasons for himself. He said to him I ??? for it teaches: ??? on ??? and does not ??? on slaves ??? with ??? and are not ??? with ??? Let us say, ??? to him slaves ??? forcibly took possession ??? No. he bought ??? No. he bought slaves ??? forcibly took possession in the earth he bought ??? No. he bought ??? slaves ??? forcibly took possession ??? No. he bought ??? No. he bought slaves For it was taught: forcibly took possession ??? he bought ??? Is this not In this case, ??? reasoned slaves ??? he is equivalent. and one master reasons that slaves ??? he is equivalent. Rav said ??? the son of of Rav Ami ??? slaves ??? he is equivalent. ??? he bought then the ruling is acceptable. ??? No. he bought in the case of ??? is equivalent ??? in Yehudah that is not ??? For it was taught in a baraita items of movable property that do not to them liens on ??? with items of movable property in which there is to them liens on By means of money with a contract and with a "chazakah" show of strength ??? words he said ??? For scripture said: (II Chron. 21) He shall give" to them ??? presentations ??? with the cities of ??? in Yehudah that it is possible that they said Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This ??? my slave ??? he is equivalent. ??? No. he bought then the ruling is acceptable. this one that teaches he bought ??? upon it And so ??? upon it What then does it mean when it says you shall a courtyward ??? She and a courtyward ??? No. he bought And if you say ??? for this statement that Raba said poses a contradiction: all ??? walking No. he bought ??? who dwells No. he bought And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? For it was taught: forcibly took possession in the earth he bought slaves there i.e., in another mishna ??? from this general principle it would follow That this No. he bought ??? they stand ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: Rav ??? the son of of Rav Ami my slave ??? he is equivalent. we were For if it was they stand ??? yes. If it was No. No. except ??? for he said: my slave ??? he is equivalent. why do I have they stand ??? this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Shmuel ??? to him ten fields ??? immediately the one who forcibly took possession in one from them he bought all of them ??? for he said: my slave ??? he is equivalent. why do I have ???

דף יב,ב גמרא

this one ??? to us that is not in the case of ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say that I ??? that is not ??? So, here, that I ??? that is not ??? he there i.e., in another mishna ??? one ??? items of movable property that do not have in them the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things he ??? in them? this one make kiddush. my sanctity Which Tanna taught: that R' Yochanan said in the case of simple-holiness offerings. and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi the Gallilean for he said: money or property ??? he as it is taught: (Lev. 5) ??? from by in Hashem. ??? simple offerings that are ??? these are the words of R' Yosi the Gallilean For it was taught in a mishna: ??? between in the case of the holiest of holy offerings between in the case of simple-holiness offerings. It is not ??? Let us say, that is not like Rabbi Yosi the Gallilean Even if you say R' Yosi the Gallilean For he said R' Yosi the Gallilean ??? but: after ??? even Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean give thanks and so when ??? that is high ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? For it was taught in a mishna: first-born we sell that specific perfect ??? and the master of ??? in it the his wife and he said ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah They did not teach such a ruling except first-born in these times (nowadays) ??? that is not Look, ??? there is for them to the priests ??? but: at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? No. ??? Raba ??? from by in Hashem. ??? simple offerings that are ??? these are the words of R' Yosi the Gallilean ??? Ravina ??? in areas outside the Land of Israel and According to R' Shimon for he said: if ??? if ??? yes. initially No. and if ??? and so when R' Yosi said the Gallilean ??? he ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.