It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

??? this one Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean this one rabbis ??? presentations the priesthood ??? that I presentations the priesthood and so when ??? that is high ??? Back to the main body of the text: (Lev. 5) ??? from by in Hashem. ??? simple offerings ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean ben Azzai says ??? ??? Abba ??? son of ??? says did not say ben Azzai except ??? only. Mar said: ben Azzai says ??? ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? first-born now for just as peace-offerings ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? money or property ??? he first-born -- why must that case be taught as well? except Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? tithe As it is taught: ??? it is said (in Numbers 18) No. ??? perfect ??? and the master of ??? it is said (Lev. 27) No. ??? and does not ??? No. ??? and not ??? No. perfect and not the master of ??? Ravina he would say over to it ??? Abba ??? son of ??? says did not say ben Azzai except ??? only. ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? peace-offerings now for just as first-born ??? he peace-offerings -- why must that case be taught as well? Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? tithe As it is taught: ??? it is said No. ??? perfect ??? and the master of ??? it is said No. ??? and does not ??? No. ??? and not ??? No. perfect and not the master of ??? this one ??? only. he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: it is a problem Rava said: What then does it mean when it says items of movable property that do not have in them the laws of misappropriation of sacred things items of movable property that do not have in them judgement the laws of misappropriation of sacred things And what does it mean when it says ??? ??? ??? it is a problem he said Rabbi Abba peace-offerings ??? and does not ??? This is obvious! ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? opposite ??? who follow the reasoning ??? ??? If it was who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis This is obvious! this one They said: For there is not in this case. ??? No. ??? and if who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi he gave this statement that he said poses a contradiction: For there is not in this case. ??? If you like, I could say Rabbi Natan If you wish, I would say rabbis If you wish, I would say rabbis that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? but: it is dealing with a case where there is only one. Back to the main body of the text: ??? He said to him: from all in a case ??? If you wish, I would say Rabbi Natan there i.e., in another mishna he for he said: for him the master of ox ??? the pit I ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for me ???

דף יג,ב גמרא

But here, in this case, who ??? he said meat ??? No. ??? Rabba said: a thangkgiving-offering ??? and does not ??? war bread This is obvious! at the end of the teaching, It was necessary to provide both opinions for him one who has suffered damage he eats meat ??? sends bread Here, too, This is obvious! What would you have said? immediately ??? he Let us say, for him Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat meat and I Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it bread Come and learn from this. ??? items of movable property that are of My son, ??? What then does it mean when it says If it was ??? this one The tanna teaches: to it ??? ox of Israel ??? ox of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile is exempt a Tanna taught: and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? items of movable property ??? What then does it mean when it says Rav Yehudah said ??? this one says ??? and this one says ??? this one It was taught by ??? they were two ??? after One of these says ??? and this one says ??? both are exempt It was taught by and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? in a baraita it was taught creates an exclusion ??? How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? one ??? for him except ??? took possession in it after Ravina he said ??? and after this ??? and after this ??? Another teaching is like this: ??? because of this R' Yehudah said Even if ??? and after this ??? and after this ??? is exempt as it is said (Ex. 21) ??? a man etc. until that it should be death ??? In justice, they agree ??? justice. No. in the case of this one the ox ??? It would be a logical inference As it is written except I would say until that it should be death ??? In justice, ??? judgement they agree ??? except for the domain which is assigned ??? for he said: for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? or the domain of the one who was damaged ??? Rav Chisdah said he said ??? a courtyward ??? he is liable of it on ??? and on ??? and thus he comes to say except for the domain which is assigned to the one causing damage this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper or the domain of the one who was damaged and the one who caused damage in the case where they cause damage there is an obligation on the one who caused damage and R' Elazar he said is exempt on ??? and on ??? and thus he comes to say except for the domain which is assigned to the one causing damage or the domain of the one who was damaged and the one who caused damage also is exempt and in the case where they cause damage there is an obligation on the one who caused damage to include the principal amount This is satistfactory ??? except for Rav, for he said: a Tanna taught: ox and In all things ??? there is an obligation on the one who caused damage it uses these particular words to include what? to include this one ??? in the case where they cause damage there is an obligation on the one who caused damage ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? livestock ??? perfect must make restitution ??? damage ??? must make restitution damage ??? by night or ??? and Came forth ??? is exempt Mar said: in the case where they cause damage there is an obligation on the one who caused damage ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? How so? Shall I say ??? Let us say, for him Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? in reality ??? now ??? applied to you ??? except ??? Let us say, for him Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? completely ??? now ??? applied to you a fraction ??? he ??? for me In reality lit: In the world ??? and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? ??? upon it ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.