It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

and not ??? upon it ??? If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? by night or ??? and Came forth ??? is exempt this one by day he is liable this one No. ??? upon it ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: if ??? upon it ??? he is liable ??? by night or ??? and Came forth ??? is exempt Really? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Yosef learned: a courtyward ??? he is liable of them on ??? and on ??? of Rabbi ??? He could say to you Rabbi Eliezer ??? who does not disagree For it was taught: four ??? he was R' Shimon son of ??? says ??? Any thing that was is a voluntary act ??? and not to the one causing damage he is liable in all ??? and not ??? is exempt from all to this and to this For example, a courtyward ??? is exempt of it on ??? and on ??? on ??? and on ??? and on ??? and on ??? and on ??? perfect must make restitution ??? damage festival must make restitution damage ??? No. to this and not to this For example, a courtyward that is not of both he is liable in it on ??? and on ??? on ??? and on ??? and on ??? and on ??? and on ??? perfect must make restitution ??? damage festival must make restitution damage ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, a courtyward ??? is exempt of it on ??? and on ??? it is a problem ??? For this teaching ??? is isolated ??? to this and to this between ??? between ??? this particular of Rav Yosef ??? is isolated ??? ??? It is not is isolated ??? ??? to it a courtyward of the one who was damaged ??? also where he teaches Here in this case, is equivalent ??? And we have learned there i.e., in another mishna is equivalent ??? Learn from this He disagreed with this Rabbi Zeira immediately ??? this one in the case of (Ex. 22) ??? in the field after there is not in this case. He said to him Abaye immediately ??? is isolated ??? ??? field after ??? of him. He said to him Rav Acha ??? Let us say, ??? does not disagree ??? also does not disagree He said to him: yes. and if ??? to say ??? of Rabbi Zeira ??? Back to the main body of the text: four ??? he was Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says ??? Any thing that was is a voluntary act ??? and not to the one causing damage he is liable in all on The entirety No. The tanna teaches: except he is liable in all ??? damage with whom does it agree? Rabbi ??? She for he said: ??? the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged damage ??? must make restitution I would say at the end of the teaching, No. to this and not to this For example, a courtyward that is not of both he is liable of it on ??? and on ??? What then does it mean when it says No. to this and not to this Shall I say No. to this and not to this A general principle: except ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in the field after there is not in this case. except This is obvious! No. to this and not to this except ??? And we have learned at the end of the teaching, perfect must make restitution ??? damage ??? must make restitution damage ??? According to the sages, that they said ??? the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged ??? damage he ??? But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi ??? and the end of the teaching is the rabbis. yes. For thus said for him Shmuel of Rav Yehudah ??? Our mishna and come ??? But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi ??? and the end of the teaching is the rabbis. Ravina in the name of Raba he said All of it Rabbi ??? She And what does it mean when it says No. to this and not to this No. to this and not to this ??? except ??? to this and to this ??? to it a courtyward of the one who was damaged to join with the body of the principal amount ??? to it is a voluntary act the public ??? four three are they, Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said

דף יד,ב גמרא

three ??? in four, ???

דף יד,ב משנה

Assessment of money lit. silver or that which has the value of money is made before a court בית דין and by the mouths of witnesses who must be free men lit., sons of freedom Jews lit., children of the covenant Furthermore, and the women are in the general category of damages i.e., they are treated the same as men in both categories: and the one who has suffered damage and the one who caused damage in restitutions.

דף יד,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says Assessment of silver Rav Yehudah said Assessment of this No. ??? except By means of money ??? about this teaching For the Rabbis taught a cow ??? a cow They do not say ??? a cow of a garment ??? except ??? it ??? the value of ??? For the Rabbis taught the value of silver This teaches that do not a court ??? except ??? in which they have liens on but: if Watch out for leading vav !! ??? one who has suffered damage ??? a court collect to him from them Mar said: the value of silver This teaches that do not a court ??? except ??? in which they have liens on What is to be heard to support this reading? Rabbah said son of ??? a thing ??? all silver What then does it mean when it says ??? a thing that do not to him ??? slaves and documents also Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? except Rabbah said son of ??? a thing ??? By means of money slaves and documents also ??? By means of money except Rav Ashi said the value of silver and not silver and Behold! all of them silver ??? Rav Yehudah pointed out a contradition to him son of ??? to Rav Huna. the son of of Rav Joshua a Tanna taught: the value of silver This teaches that do not a court ??? except ??? in which they have liens on For it was taught: (Ex. 21) ??? the value of silver and even ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? If it was ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, if Watch out for leading vav !! ??? one who has suffered damage ??? a court collect to him from them If it was ??? why is it that a court collect to him from them Like that which was said by Rava said: Rav ??? Here in this case, also, ??? before the house of ??? creates an exclusion ??? and after this walks to the court Learn from this ??? and after this came to the court yes. a court collect to him from them except creates an exclusion to the court bet din ??? by the mouth of ??? creates an exclusion ??? and after this ??? witnesses that he was is exempt This is satistfactory for one for he said: give thanks ??? and after this ??? witnesses is exempt except for one for he said: give thanks ??? and after this ??? witnesses he is liable What is there to say? at the end of the teaching, It was necessary to provide both opinions for him

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.