It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

All of it Rabbi ??? She But the beginning of the teaching, ??? which is assigned ??? to one from them and to this and to this ??? to it a courtyward of the one who was damaged But to the one lit: the body who the principal amount ??? is a voluntary act the public Rav said ??? in front of Rav ??? And he said to me who seeks ??? to it All of it like Rabbi ??? to eat ??? to it ??? to it yes. that do not ??? to it No. and if R' Tarfon Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged damage ??? must make restitution But rather, in reality lit: in the world, It is the rabbis' position and it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: five ??? there are. and if ??? and a foot ??? of the one who was damaged He disagreed with this Ravina this one The tanna teaches: ??? ox the one who caused damage ??? of the one who was damaged How so? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? of it It is because of this: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: How so? except If you say, No. ??? of it What then does it mean when it says How so? except Ravina said it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: five ??? there are. and if ??? and a foot ??? ox the festival ??? the one who caused damage ??? of the one who was damaged It is a disagreement R' Tarfon And the rabbbis and there are ??? others ??? and the lion, ??? Another teaching is like this: five ??? there are. and if ??? and a foot ??? ox the festival ??? the one who caused damage ??? of the one who was damaged It is a disagreement Rabbi ??? And the rabbbis and there are ??? others ??? and the lion, ??? that it is possible ??? to it ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: five ??? and five ??? And, too, there is not in this case. ??? the lion, ??? Ravina said it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: five ??? there are. and if ??? and a foot ??? ox the festival ??? the one who caused damage ??? of the one who was damaged It is a disagreement Rabbi ??? And the rabbbis and there are ??? others ??? and the lion, ??? and not ??? Rabbi Eliezer said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? children ??? he Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? a person and ??? and the vessels Perhaps from the trapping of that it is possible that they said R' Elazar said No. you say ??? he ??? but: ??? children ??? he except even ??? children also Is this not ??? he They challenged him from this teaching: ??? a person and ??? and the vessels Rabbi Eliezer said Perhaps from the trapping of that it is possible ??? to it ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: and not ??? For it was taught: ??? a person and ??? and the vessels Rabbi Eliezer said There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? and the lion, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yosef said ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Rabbi Meir says: Even ??? Rabbi Eliezer says Even ??? and Rav Yosef said ??? -- this refers to ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? male, here, ??? as it is taught: ??? male, after "satisfied" two was it made? ??? after "satisfied" two was it made? ??? after ??? two was it made? ??? after "satisfied" two was it made? ??? after "satisfied" two was it made? ??? the spine of a person after "satisfied" two was it made? a snake and what case is he dealing with? that is not he bowed ??? Mar said: Rabbi Meir says: Even ???

דף טז,ב גמרא

Rabbi Eliezer says Even ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We We have learnt in a Mishna: R' Elazar says at a time i.e., in a case that are My son, an upbringing of are not ??? festival In reality lit: In the world It was taught by a snake Shmuel said lion, in the public domain ??? he ate is exempt ??? he ate he is liable ??? he ate is exempt immediately ??? it was. for him just as ??? fruits and vegetables that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? in a public domain but exempt him ??? Is this not ??? he This comes to imply ??? Is this not ??? he For it is written (Nahum 2) ??? You tear ??? on account of ??? on account of ??? "And he filled ??? on account of ??? on account of ??? For it was taught: and thus raw lit., living ??? to courtyard of the one who was damaged ??? livestock ??? meat must make restitution damage ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? this one ??? The tanna teaches: ??? And furthermore, of Shmuel also Perhaps thus he Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said to the side The tanna teaches: ??? or ??? damage ??? Ravina he said and thus he comes to say Shmuel ??? an upbringing of and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi ??? for he said: Is this not ??? If so, Even if ??? also ??? except of Ravina Is this not ??? was it said; except ??? For It was taught by ??? an upbringing of and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? for he said: Is this not ??? he is required ??? What then does it mean when it says This case where he teaches to it regarding ??? regarding ??? he is required ??? it is a problem

דף טז,ב משנה

Just as between perfect ??? except ??? must make restitution ??? damage ??? must make restitution damage ??? from ???

דף טז,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbi Eliezer said ??? And thus it says (II Chron. 32) ??? Hezekiyah with ??? My son, David and R' Eliezer said ??? next to ??? and one ??? David Solomon (II Chron. 16) ??? who ??? to him in the city David ??? who fill spices ??? What then does it mean when it says spices ??? Rabbi Eliezer he said ??? Watch out for leading vav And R' Shmuel bar Nachmani said spices for all of ??? of them came to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? (Jer. 18) For ??? Rabbi Eliezer he said ??? Watch out for leading vav And R' Shmuel bar Nachmani said ??? a man This is satisfactory ??? it is written (Prov. 23) For ??? except ??? a man What then does it mean when it says ??? because ??? a man who ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? This is satisfactory ??? a man it is written (Jer. 18) And you, Hashem you knew. all ??? by the "of death, except for one for he said: ??? What then does it mean when it says "of death, ??? Raba What then does it mean that it is written (Jer. 5) ??? before you In an hour of ??? One who acts at them." he said ??? before the Holy One, Who is Blessed Master of the world even at the hour ??? justice ??? a person those that are not ??? so that that did not have ??? about them ??? (II Chron. 32) and honor." they make to him ??? This teaches ??? on ??? They disagreed about this, R' he gave And the rabbbis One says three

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.