It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

??? he is equivalent. He sent to him Rabbi Abba son of ??? son of Master, he is required of him ??? he returns ??? his fellow that did not have ??? It is necessary for him ??? to him the reward for or No. ??? For Rav Huna He said to him Rabbah the son of Rav Huna Thus said Abba ??? in the name of Rav it is not necessary for him ??? to him the reward for ??? the house of ??? the reward for ??? Shimon What then does it mean when it says ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found the house of Shimon ??? to him the reward for both this one ??? this one that is not ??? was it said; also said Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: Rav said And there are those who say it was he said R' Chiyya son of Avin: Rav Huna said he returns ??? his fellow that did not have ??? it is not necessary for him ??? to him the reward for ??? the house of ??? the city ??? the reward for ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? to him ??? elevate to them the reward for both this one ??? this one that is not ??? Rav Sahorah said: Rav Huna said Rav said he returns ??? his fellow that did not have ??? it is not necessary ??? to him the reward for It is because of this: as it is said (Is. 24) ??? the gate Mar said: son of Rav Ashi To me Look, for him ??? For ??? Rav Yosef said: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: that he came he makes use of him. ??? There was this guy ??? Rav ??? of him Let us say, his reasoning is Rav ??? he returns ??? his fellow that did not have ??? It is necessary for him ??? to him the reward for This certain individual from the beginning ??? are they, ??? of him. ??? them ??? a thing ??? He said to him ??? and not ??? Rav ??? How so? ??? Just as ??? Rav said ??? And Shmuel said even ??? also is exempt ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? For example, ??? and there are ??? about this teaching ??? in the presence of ??? Rav said: ??? And Shmuel said ??? Just as ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? For example, ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak ??? Just as ??? in what way does It concerns itself This is obvious! ??? and he said ??? Just as ??? Just as ??? yes. Just as ??? No. he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it ??? that it is possible that they said ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? a place ??? to the public thoroughfare So, too, here, was it said; Rav said They did not teach this לא שנו except ??? but: ??? a place ??? And Shmuel said even ??? a place ??? to the public thoroughfare ??? Let us say, ??? Rav for he said: is exempt his reasoning is a pit ??? he is liable And for Shmuel for he said: he is liable his reasoning is a pit ??? is exempt Rav would say to you In reality lit: In the world I would say to you

דף כא,ב גמרא

in reality a pit ??? is exempt that I Here in this case, for he said: Is this not all ??? them ??? them ??? And Shmuel said in reality a pit ??? he is liable ??? a pit that it is possible to say Is this not ??? except fruits who that it is possible to say Is this not ??? this one Look, them Let us say, ??? She as it is taught: ??? from the midst of ??? Just as ??? Just as ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. And Rabbi Yehudah Rabbi Yosei ??? say yes. ??? to eat except ??? R' Yosi we were a Tanna taught: that came first except ??? There is this difference between them: Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned ??? also must make restitution Just as ??? and Rabbi Yosei, reasoned ??? Just as ??? No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? If it was ??? If it was ??? and here in this other case, ??? in the field after ??? one master reasons that (Ex. 22) ??? in the field after and not in the public domain and one master reasons that ??? in the field after and not ??? the one who caused damage ??? the one who caused damage Let us say, ??? What then does it mean when it says he is required except ??? And Rabbi ??? There is this difference between them:

דף כא,ב משנה

??? the vessels must make restitution damage ??? because of that are ??? he has walked ??? he ate ??? on ??? must make restitution damage ??? and on ??? must make restitution ??? damage

דף כא,ב גמרא

The reason is ??? this one ??? is exempt Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? is exempt Another teaching is like this: ??? the vessels must make restitution damage ??? are exempt This is satistfactory ??? is exempt except ??? he is liable What is there to say? For example, ??? vessels to join with the body of wall and so when ??? No. ??? upon them and even ??? there is not in this case. Rav said ??? in the name of Raba occasions for even if ??? also he is liable It concerns itself in a wall ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him ??? the end of the end of No. stillborn lit., fallen ??? we do not have ??? he it is not necessary to teach this in a wall It is distressing The rabbis taught: ??? is more are exempt upwards to the bottom they are obligated a person and a rooster ??? between upwards to the bottom between downwards is more they are obligated

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.