It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כה,א משנה

No. "Lord" (Adon) the principal amount ??? I "Lord" (Adon) the principal amount ??? for just as in a place ??? on ??? and on ??? in the public domain ??? a place ??? on ??? and on ??? of the one who was damaged is it not logical ??? They said to him: ??? in going from justice. to be ??? Just as in the public domain ??? damage Even ??? of the one who was damaged ??? damage

דף כה,א גמרא

and Rabbi Tarfon he does not have ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? a law established by the Torah he as it is taught: ??? is a kal vachomer How so? (Num. 12) and he said Hashem to Moses ??? in front of it Watch out for leading vav Is it not the case that ??? seven days is a kal vachomer the Shechina four ten day except ??? in going from justice. to be ??? For he does not have ??? in a case ??? is a kal vachomer in a case that is not ??? is a kal vachomer it has ??? there i.e., in another mishna seven ??? No. are written he came is a kal vachomer Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it the fourteenth he came ??? seven ??? seven But here, in this case, ??? damage it is written and he came is a kal vachomer and he carried it ??? damage other than this was it made? damage ??? If it was ??? for him is a kal vachomer And the rabbbis seven ??? are written ??? seven days and Rabbi Tarfon This certain individual ??? he And the rabbbis it is written he read other than this ??? and Rabbi Tarfon This certain individual for even in the case where in reality ??? and not shall you say Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? of Moses but: in reality No. Come and learn from this. He said to him Rav ??? Hey, isn't it the case that This a Tanna taught: that is not he expounds. ??? and even though that is not ??? is a kal vachomer as it is taught: a seminal emission in the case of a zav ??? It would be a logical inference Just as tahor ??? tamei ??? tamei ??? is it not logical that it should be tamei ??? to it between ??? between ??? But why? Let him say ??? is a kal vachomer ??? To exclude ??? And if you say ??? No. It was necessary to provide both opinions is a kal vachomer that is not ??? tahor It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: (Deut. 23) ??? night it is written who ??? to him he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not ??? to him except Another thing: ??? to him Come and learn from this. something and not Another explanation: it is written and Which Tanna taught: ??? for him for he said: emitting seed of One suffering from gonorrhea become tamei by being carried No. ??? and not Rabbi Yehoshua For it was taught in a baraita emitting seed of One suffering from gonorrhea become tamei ??? And there is no meaning to the word become tamei by being carried these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua says: Even become tamei by being carried on account of where it is not possible without ??? a gonorrheal emission Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehoshua there i.e., in another mishna except where it is not possible without ??? a gonorrheal emission this one Is this not thus No. except This a Tanna taught: he For it was taught in a baraita is more from them

דף כה,ב גמרא

??? of One suffering from gonorrhea ??? his feet ??? impart tumah between ??? between by being carried and Perhaps So, here, on account of ??? without ??? a gonorrheal emission If so, ??? regarding ??? What is the difference where he teaches to it regarding ??? except It is because of this: ??? He said to him Rav Acha ??? Hey, isn't it the case that This a Tanna taught: No. he expounds. ??? and even though that is not ??? is a kal vachomer as it is taught: ??? It would be a logical inference for just as ??? children ??? in the case of a zav become tamei ??? in the case of a zav is it not logical ??? to it between ??? evening between ??? seven But why? I would say ??? is a kal vachomer ??? evening ??? To exclude ??? seven He said to him Already ??? son of ??? And he said to him: Abaye a Tanna taught: ??? to it This is what he means: ??? It would be a logical inference for just as ??? children ??? in the case of a zav ??? in the case of a zav is it not logical that it should be tamei ??? except ??? it is said (Lev. 11) ??? and it is said (Num. 31) ??? Just as ??? is said ??? tamei in it Even ??? is said ??? tamei in it ??? For if it was No. ??? that it is possible to find fault with this argument Just as ??? which provides become tamei ??? shall you say ??? that do not become tamei ??? except in the amount like an olive ??? seed As it is written (Lev. 22) or a man who ??? etc. and right next lit: and leaning for him or a man who ??? in all ??? and then it is written of him. ??? seed (Lev. 15) and all ??? and all ??? who it shall be upon it emitting seed ??? the Merciful One ??? why do I have Learn from this ??? one he This is satistfactory ??? one ??? and We do not answer then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? What is there to say? ??? also ??? did he die ??? seed As it is written (Lev. 22) ??? in all tamei ??? or a man who ??? from him etc. and then it is written of him. ??? seed and all ??? and all ??? who it shall be upon it emitting seed ??? the Merciful One ??? why do I have Learn from this ??? you shall ??? This is satistfactory ??? except ??? What is there to say? Rabba said: Scripture states: (Num. 31) ??? by day ??? all ??? impart tumah ??? No. ??? and shall be ??? and a foot he is liable in a public domain by a "kal vachomer" for just as the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged he does not must make restitution except ??? damage in a public domain ??? and a foot ??? of the one who was damaged must make restitution damage ??? is it not logical ??? he is liable Scripture states: (Ex. 22) ??? in the field after and not in the public domain

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.