It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כו,א גמרא

something completely we say it. a fraction we say it. Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ??? ??? of this and not ??? of after and she will not be ??? and a foot ??? of the one who was damaged except ??? damage From a "kal vachomer", ??? for just as the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged It is not ??? except ??? damage ??? and a foot ??? the public ??? is it not logical ??? of the one who was damaged must make restitution ??? damage Scripture states: ??? restitution ??? and she will not be the principal amount in the public domain he is liable From a "kal vachomer", for just as ??? and a foot ??? of the one who was damaged damage ??? in the public domain ??? the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged ??? damage is it not logical ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: Scripture states: ??? yes. ??? damage ??? No. in the public domain and not in a personal domain ??? a person he is liable ??? From a "kal vachomer", for just as ox that is not he is liable ??? items he is liable ??? a person ??? items is it not logical that it should be he is liable ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ??? who ??? upon it upon it and not on a person ??? ox he is liable ??? items From a "kal vachomer", for just as a person that is not he is liable ??? he is liable ??? items ox ??? is it not logical that it should be he is liable ??? items Scripture states: (Lev. 24) a man ??? and not ox ??? They posed this difficulty: a foot ??? atop the infant ??? of the one who was damaged What then? ??? who say something ??? the principal amount immediately ??? two three ??? he and He will take restitution for ??? So, here, there is no difference or, perhaps, the principal amount ??? to cause damage This yes. ??? to cause damage Come and hear: He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? the house did he die the ox by stoning, ??? between perfect between festival must make restitution ??? these are the words of R' Tarfon ??? to Rabbi ??? for him Is this not It is because of this: ??? for him like Rabbi Yosi the Gallilean for he said: perfect must make restitution ??? in the public domain ??? to it From a "kal vachomer", ??? Perhaps, that it is possible ??? Rav said ??? a Tanna taught: ??? to it ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? in fire ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? humilate Just as ??? in fire humilate ??? Just as ??? except Is this not Learn from this ??? to it Perhaps, that it is possible ??? Learn from this He said to him Rav Acha ??? So, here, ??? That there are ??? For if it was ??? there is not in this case. ??? and it was taught ??? to it ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? except Is this not Learn from this ??? to it Perhaps, that it is possible ??? Learn from this

דף כו,א משנה

a person festival In reality lit: In the world between ??? between ??? between ??? between sleeping ??? well his fellow ??? the vessels must make restitution damage ???

דף כו,א גמרא

The tanna teaches: ??? well his fellow is equivalent ??? the vessels Just as there i.e., in another mishna damage yes. four items No. Even ??? well his fellow damage yes. four items No.

דף כו,ב גמרא

From where do we derive this? he said ??? and thus was taught of the academy of Hezekiyah said: he read (Ex. 21) ??? under ??? on ??? and on ??? This he had asked for him to give ??? in a place damage If so, to write he read ??? What then does it mean when it says under ??? Learn from this both Rabbah said it was the stone ??? to him ??? and not ??? of it and he stood "She has fallen in the matter of ??? he is liable in the matter of four items is exempt in the matter of Sabbath ??? Torah in the matter of exile is exempt in the matter of a slave ??? And the rabbbis as it is taught: Behold! that he was his rabbi; who heals and he said to him like the sand the eyes of ??? for me ??? and went out to freedom Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says (Ex. 21) ??? until ??? of it ??? and he stood "She has fallen in the matter of ??? he is liable in the matter of four items is exempt in the matter of exile he is liable For scripture said: (Num. 35) ??? from this general principle it would follow that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? for him ??? in the matter of Sabbath is exempt in the matter of a slave ??? And the rabbbis ??? to throw two In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- four in the matter of ??? he is liable in the matter of four items is exempt in the matter of Sabbath ??? in the case of in the matter of exile (Ex. 21) who No. ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says creates an exclusion ??? to throw two In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- four in the matter of a slave ??? And the rabbbis ??? to throw four In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- eight in the matter of ??? he is liable in the matter of four items is exempt in the matter of Sabbath in the case of one who says in all places ??? yes. If it was No. No. in the matter of exile who No. ??? creates an exclusion ??? to throw four In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- eight in the matter of a slave ??? And the rabbbis and Rabbah said In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- implements of ??? and someone else came ??? is exempt What is the reason? ??? and Rabbah said In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- implements of ??? they were beneath it ??? or ??? someone else came ??? or Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? is exempt What is the reason? to inform lit: to witness ??? and Rabbah said In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- the infant ??? and someone else came ??? with R' Yehudah en Beteira And the rabbbis as it is taught: ??? ten people in a case where there are ten ??? between "At the same time," between "In the case of this one after that one," all of them

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.