It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כח,א גמרא

Your nation son of ??? he ??? rabbis upon it Rabbi ??? he said What then does it mean when it says that was lame ??? In justice, If so, and say to him and say to him should bring himself mine I take are his he take should bring himself it is a problem Come and hear: ox that atop על גבי ascended his fellow ??? came the master of ??? are his and it fell on high." did he die is exempt Is this not ??? No. ??? That there are ??? If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? did he die he is liable and if ??? why is it that he is liable that he was to him ??? and not ??? Come and hear: ??? a courtyward his fellow so that wine and jars of oil the master of ??? and he goes out ??? and he has entered he said ??? son of Isaac ??? and he goes out to the court bet din ??? and he has entered ??? Come and hear: ??? to him his days his rabbi; ??? in it to go out ??? One who acts in it ??? that he was is exempt Scripture states: (Num. 35) No. ??? No. ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? From a thief until ??? No. ??? and now ??? until ??? it was. ??? of his teacher upon it now he does not have ??? of his teacher upon it ??? son of Isaac he said ??? to him his rabbi; a maidservant ??? until ??? and now ??? Come and hear: they have placed ??? in the public domain and someone else came ??? of it ??? is exempt The reason is ??? of it this one ??? he is liable Rav said ??? in the name of Raba it is the law Even if ??? and This case where he teaches ??? at the end of the teaching, if ??? the master of ??? he is liable ??? but: ??? No. ??? The tanna teaches: But the beginning of the teaching, ??? Come and hear: (Deut. 25) ??? ??? money or property Is this not ??? would find it possible ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another thing: No. ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another thing: but: it is not possible ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another thing: ??? If so, ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? creates an exclusion ??? a court בית דין ??? and So let him teach ??? In what matters are we saying this? ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another explanation: but: it is not possible ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another thing: ??? So, here, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: In what matters are we saying this? ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another thing: but: it is not possible ??? by way of lit., through the hands of Another thing: was it made? ??? a court בית דין ??? Come and hear: Behold! ??? a way the public ??? in the midst of ??? raised up i.e., separated and He gave to them from the trapping of Just as ??? he gave are his No. ??? And if you say does he act? ??? judgement for his own sake ??? Rav said ??? in the name of Raba ??? lest He shall give" to them a way ??? Rav ??? he said ??? to them a way ??? Rav Ashi said: all from the trapping of a way ??? he ??? to this ??? to this If so, why is it that are his No. ??? Let us say, them ??? and declare ye for me ??? It is because of this: of Rav Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah ??? in it many is forbidden ??? Come and hear: the master of the house ??? one ??? and they brought ??? after both this and this ??? does he act? ??? judgement for his own sake why is it that both this and this ??? Rabba said: What then does it mean when it says both this and this ??? from the tithe As it is taught: ??? ??? and One who arose early in the morning ??? he is liable ??? but exempt him from the tithe

דף כח,א משנה

??? in the public domain ??? one in water or ??? with clay he is liable Rabbi Yehudah says ??? he is liable ??? is exempt

דף כח,א גמרא

Rav Yehudah said Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? its implements in water

דף כח,ב גמרא

but: should it itself is exempt ??? the world ??? For ??? in front of Shmuel He said to me: ??? we have learned and all of them I reads of them ox and not a person a donkey and not vessels and what case is he dealing with? in the matter of ??? but: in the matter of ??? a person he is liable and vessels are exempt Rav What case is he dealing with? in a case ??? but: in a case that is not ??? he He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Oshaya: (Ex. 21) and it fell her name ox or a donkey ox and not a person a donkey and not vessels from here stillborn lit., fallen said to its midst ox and its implements ??? a donkey and its implements ??? he is liable on ??? but exempt him on the vessels this one For what reason this ??? in the public domain ??? Just as ??? to this he had asked for him Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to this ??? in the public domain ??? For this reason if ??? he is liable But the beginning of the teaching, It is a difficulty for Rav's position. and at the end of the teaching, it is a problem ??? to you She Back to the main body of the text: ??? But the beginning of the teaching, is exempt and at the end of the teaching, he is liable except Rav ??? with his reasoning And for Shmuel ??? with his reasoning Rav ??? with his reasoning Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but not ??? he is liable For this reason ??? he is liable And for Shmuel ??? with his reasoning now that you said ??? he is equivalent. according to R' Yehudah ??? on ??? vessels ??? For this reason ??? he is liable R' Elazar said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? in the earth ??? is exempt like who that is not ??? he gave that it is possible that they said R' Elazar said No. you say ??? he ??? but: ??? in the earth ??? is exempt except even ??? in the earth ??? he is liable like who ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? he is liable ??? How so? How should we understand this? ??? Rabbah said ??? to the bottom ??? He said to him Abaye from this general principle it would follow ??? even ??? He said to him yes. he is obligated he was ??? Even if its ear in his hand why is it that ??? he and compulsion the Merciful One ??? As it is written (Deut. 22) ??? No. shall you do a thing And if you say that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in the matter of ??? but: in the matter of ??? he is liable For it was taught: ??? and not ??? stillborn lit., fallen ??? and not ??? he is obligated ??? But the sages say:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.