It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

??? until ??? Mar said: ??? -- this refers to ??? And thus it says ??? a foot the ox ??? The reason is ??? the Merciful One ??? a foot the ox ??? this one Is this not thus in what way ??? to it If it was the principal amount it is written If it was ??? it is written It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: This and this ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one that is not ??? Come and learn from this. and now ??? that is not ??? From where do we derive this? is equivalent ??? Just as a foot there is no difference ??? and there is no difference No. ??? Even ??? there is no difference ??? and there is no difference No. ??? Mar said: (Ex. 22) ??? -- this refers to ??? And thus it says (I Kings 14) as it was ??? until ??? The reason is ??? the Merciful One as it was ??? until ??? this one Is this not thus in what way ??? to it If it was the principal amount it is written If it was a foot it is written It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: This and this ??? this one ??? ipso facto this one ??? Emmissaries Come and learn from this. and now ??? a foot ??? ipso facto From where do we derive this? is equivalent ??? Just as ??? there is no difference ??? Emmissaries They did not teach this לא שנו ??? ipso facto Even a foot there is no difference ??? Emmissaries there is no difference ??? ipso facto and let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? and it does not require ??? a foot ??? a foot As it is written (Is. 32) ??? a foot the ox ??? As it is written (Deut. 32) ??? with them." If it was Is this not he read ??? or this one or this one or a foot ??? is found or ??? benefit ??? there are. And they went --- both ??? from them ??? It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: What case is he dealing with? in what way does ??? Emmissaries but: ??? ipso facto No. ??? Who is it ??? in a wall ??? fruits ??? what is the difference here, ??? benefit ??? and your money ??? upon you Behold! also there are benefit ??? and your money and we must guard upon you except ??? And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav ??? Who is it ??? a way ??? a way ??? what is the difference here, a foot ??? is found and your money ??? upon you Behold! also ??? is found and your money and we must guard upon you except ??? And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? No. ??? are written and not ??? are written This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction (Ex. 21) and the dead it shall be to him the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? the sages, ??? death ??? my slave death No. my slave the end of the end of this ??? and this ??? except ??? in a public domain ??? How so? If it was ??? between for Rav, or whether ??? we were a pit

דף ג,ב גמרא

and if that is not ??? If it was ??? for he said: all of them ??? we have learned we were a pit and if for Rav, for he said: all of them ??? we have learned we were ox what is the difference here, a pit which provides the beginning of ??? and your money ??? upon you Behold! also the beginning of ??? and your money and we must guard upon you except ??? And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? If it was ??? for he said: "meba'eh" -- this refers to ??? this one ??? If it was for Rav, for he said: "meba'eh" this a person What then does it mean when it says the forefathers And what does it mean when it says ??? is in it And if you say ??? sleeping For it was taught in a mishna: a person festival In reality lit: In the world between ??? between sleeping except ??? How so? If it was ??? his strength it was. If it was according to ??? between for Rav, between ??? we were a pit except ??? And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? on top of lit. on the head of ??? How so? If it was ??? we were fire What is the difference fire ??? after ??? of them and your money ??? upon you Behold! also The strength after ??? of them and your money and we must guard upon you except ??? And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav ??? a foot this one ??? damage ??? We have a tradition that to it But why? a seminal emission to it ??? to make whole from ??? Hey, isn't it the case that -- why must that case be taught as well? he is required Raba who seeks Raba ??? damage ??? must make restitution or from ??? must make restitution to Raba -- why must that case be taught as well? for him for Rav, ??? This is obvious to him. to Raba ??? for him why is it that a seminal emission to it ??? the "meba'eh" and the fire ??? What then does it mean when it says "meba'eh" Rav said: "meba'eh" this a person And Shmuel said "meba'eh" this ??? Rav said: "meba'eh" this a person As it is written (Is. 21) he said ??? he came mornings also night if ??? And Shmuel said "meba'eh" this ??? As it is written (Obadiah 1) ??? they make ??? What is to be heard to support this reading? ??? Rav Yosef ??? they make ??? Rav What is the reason? did not say ??? He could say to you who The tanna teaches: ??? And for Shmuel What is the reason מאי טעמא did not say ??? He could say to you who The tanna teaches: ??? No. ??? and not ??? Rav What is the reason מאי טעמא did not say ??? a Tanna taught: ox and In all things ??? And for Shmuel also But hey, wasn't this already taught elsewhere ox Rav Yehudah said a Tanna taught: ox ??? and thus he comes to say No. ??? that do not benefit ??? in which there is benefit ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.