It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ל,א גמרא

It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael etc. There is no difficulty. this one according to his own reason this one according to the reason of his teacher

דף ל,א משנה

??? water in the public domain ??? of them after he is liable ??? ??? and ??? ??? of them others he is liable ???

דף ל,א גמרא

Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? its implements in water but: should it itself is exempt ??? the world ??? He said to him Rav Huna for Rav, No. ??? except ??? Who deduces that is not they completed --- ??? and two why do I have one in the days of the sun and one in the days of the rains as it is taught: all these where they said ??? in the days of the sun Watch out for leading vav And they do not have is a voluntary act and in the days of the rains there are to them is a voluntary act And even though ??? if ??? they are obligated ??? ??? that R' Yochanan said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? No. What is the reason מאי טעמא is exempt Rav Acha said the son of of Rav ??? because it is not their way of people ??? The Rabbis taught ??? wall of his fellow came the master of wall ??? and it fell ??? he is liable ??? that R' Yochanan said They did not teach such a ruling except in a wall ??? but: in a wall ??? is exempt he is liable the master of the wall Ravina said This one says ??? of his fellow came the master of ??? and he took ??? he is liable the master of the pit This is obvious! What would you have said? there i.e., in another mishna he that is not you shall know for him ??? But here, in this case, ??? for him it was. for him ??? Come and learn from this. The Rabbis taught the early generations of pious ones they were ??? in the midst of ??? to them three handbreadths so that that did not have ??? Rav Sheishet my field them in fire Raba my field them ??? Rav Yehudah said And if one who seeks ??? the Chasid: to establish words ??? Rava said: words ??? And there are those who say it was words that blessings

דף ל,א משנה

the taking out ??? of them after he is liable ??? and all ??? of them took possession Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all ??? in the public domain ??? they are obligated to make whole and all ??? of them took possession ??? ??? in the public domain ??? of them after he is liable ???

דף ל,א גמרא

Let us say, ??? that is not like R' Yehudah as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: in the hour of ??? a person sent forth ??? all thirty day so that that it should be ??? a person ??? livestock for upon ??? thus ??? Joshua the land Even if you say Rabbi Yehudah give thanks Rabbi Yehudah ??? must make restitution Just as ??? For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Yehudah says ??? is exempt because it was ??? Is this not It is because of this: is a voluntary act a court No. It is because of this: is a voluntary act a commandment as it is taught: Rabbi Yehudah says ??? is exempt because it was is a voluntary act a commandment Come and hear: all these where they said are permitted ??? in a public domain if ??? they are obligated to make whole And Rabbi Yehudah exempts Rav Nachman said ??? that did not have in the hour of ??? and it is R' Yehudah Rav Ashi said:

דף ל,ב גמרא

??? We have learnt in a Mishna: It is because of this: ??? all ??? of them ??? Rav said between ??? between ??? he said ??? but not ??? about what do they disagree? Rav reasoned ??? It is because of this: ??? reasoned No. ??? It is because of this: ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? ??? in the public domain ??? of them after he is liable ??? And even all ??? took possession No. The tanna teaches: a Tanna taught: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that It was taught by He ascended are forbidden It is because of this: ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: are forbidden It is because of this: ??? he arises to that very ??? took possession Hey, isn't it the case that No. The tanna teaches: thus For it was taught in a baraita the taking out ??? of them after he is liable ??? and all ??? of them took possession and it is permitted It is because of this: ??? ??? of them after he is liable is forbidden It is because of this: ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? a thing in which there is in it praise ??? It is because of this: ??? a thing in which is not praise No. ??? They posed this difficulty: according to the words of One who says ??? It is because of this: ??? or ??? Come and hear: ??? For ??? Rav ??? Rav ??? who that it is possible ??? A general principle: Let us say, ??? a legal document ??? in it usurious interest ??? that specific and does not ??? not ??? and not ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. But the sages say: ??? ??? but not ??? Let us say, Rav for he said: like Rabbi ??? for he said: ??? Rav would say to you I that they said Even if According to the sages, Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except the principal amount ??? But here, in this case, the principal amount Back to the main body of the text: ??? He could say to you I that they said Even if According to Rabbi Meir, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna except ??? "writing" ??? for him ??? But here, in this case, who ??? Let us say, ??? the taking out ??? of them after he is liable ??? and all ??? of them took possession are forbidden It is because of this: ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says all ??? in the public domain ??? they are obligated to make whole and all ??? of them took possession and are permitted It is because of this: ??? this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? all ??? of them took possession and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: are forbidden It is because of this: ??? except Is this not thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and all ??? of them took possession ??? are forbidden It is because of this: ??? and he came Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel to say Even if ??? also all ??? of them took possession ??? certainly ??? She for Rav, Who would say ??? She Rav would say to you everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? It is because of this: ??? and here in this other case, in matters of halacha. And there is no meaning to the word ??? thus ??? Rav Huna Rav said The halacha is And there is no meaning to the word ??? thus Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? he said The halacha is ??? thus Really? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Huna ??? Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.