It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לד,א גמרא

and even ??? before it was even the case that there is an obligation on the master of obligation ??? Learn from this ??? Just as ??? No. ??? No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you Just as ??? and It is different there in that case ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? it was. No. ??? it was. regarding for him That this ??? of him ??? The Rabbis taught ox the value of two hundred ??? ox the value of two hundred ??? in it ??? zuz and praise and he stood on four hundred zuz ??? He was standing on eight hundred zuz he gives ??? of damages ??? In justice, praise one who caused damage he gives to him ??? of damages ??? In justice, Mar said: praise one who caused damage he gives ??? of damages with whom does it agree? R' Yishmael She for he said: the master of obligation he ??? he ??? for him I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? In justice, ??? Rabbi Akivah for he said: ??? But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Yishmael and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Akiva No. All of it Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? ??? If it was ??? I would say But the beginning of the teaching, praise and he stood on four hundred zuz he gives to him ??? of damages If it was ??? it's necessary to say this. Rav Pappa said: But the beginning of the teaching, It concerns itself between ??? between ??? ipso facto and It was necessary to provide both opinions ??? ipso facto he gives to him ??? of damages at the end of the teaching, No. It concerns itself except ??? In justice, ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? work Let us say, for him ??? and I ??? Rav Ashi said ??? of him.

דף לד,א משנה

ox the value of two hundred ??? ox the value of two hundred And there is no meaning to the word ??? proper anything he said ??? on this it is said (Ex. 21) ??? the ox ??? ??? He said to him Rabbi Yehudah and thus The halacha is standing ??? the ox ??? ??? and you have not upheld also the dead ??? and whichever this ox the value of two hundred ??? ox the value of two hundred ??? proper ??? zuz for this take ??? the dead and this take ??? the dead

דף לד,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught ox the value of two hundred ??? ox the value of two hundred ??? proper ??? zuz this take ??? the dead and this take ??? the dead ??? ox is said in the Torah these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Meir says: yes. ??? ox is said in the Torah except ox the value of two hundred ??? the value of two hundred And there is no meaning to the word ??? proper anything on this it is said ??? the ox ??? ??? except Just as I is fulfilled lit. is stood up also the dead ??? Watch out for leading vav or his female slave death ??? between ??? between Rabbi Yehudah This hundred and twenty and five ??? and that one hundred and twenty and five ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabba said: ??? roadkill There is this difference between them: Rabbi Meir reasoned ??? roadkill ??? you shall And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? roadkill ??? you shall a fraction He said to him Abaye If so, ??? to Rabbi Yehudah

דף לד,ב גמרא

perfect a donkey ??? And if you say Here, too, ??? R' Yehuda says: perfect he is liable ??? is exempt I will say ??? for him to Rabbi Yehudah in the matter of guarding ??? in the matter of restitution who ??? for him For it was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says It is possible ox the value of a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? ox the value of ??? proper a sela coin this take ??? the dead and this take ??? the dead is what you say? Do you really mean that? And so festival For what reason he would exit ??? upon it or ??? upon it you shall says ??? upon it for just as festival he does not must make restitution except Just as ??? perfect ??? not all the more so? except that R' Yochanan said praise roadkill There is this difference between them: ??? you shall ??? a fraction And this is like the position that he came has a problem ??? now that you said ??? the Merciful One ??? It is possible ox the value of ??? ox the value of a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? proper ??? zuz this take ??? the dead and this take ??? the dead is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? one who caused damage ??? for this ??? And it is said: (Ex. 21) ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Why "And it is said"? I.e., why do I need both prooftexts? And if you say What case is he dealing with? in a case That there are ??? but: in a case ??? For example, ox the value of ??? ox the value of ??? proper thirty zuz ??? also one who caused damage ??? And it is said: ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? He said to him Rav Acha son of ??? to Raba If so, ??? to Rabbi Yehudah perfect must make restitution -- more ??? damage and the Torah he said (Ex. 21) ??? the ox ??? ??? it has ??? death ??? for him (Ex. 21) ??? the dead ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? R' Yehudah to this take ??? the dead and this take ??? the dead If so, ??? he read and the dead What then does it mean when it says also Learn from this both

דף לד,ב משנה

there are he is liable on It once happened ??? but exempt him on It once happened himself is exempt on It once happened ??? he is liable on It once happened himself How so? ??? is exempt This is only in the case ??? he is liable ??? well his male slave ??? ??? is exempt This is only in the case ??? well his male slave ??? ??? he is liable ??? he is liable This is only in the case ??? and his mother is exempt ??? ??? on Shabbat he is liable This is only in the case ??? ??? on Shabbat is exempt because it was make him forfeit his soul

דף לד,ב גמרא

It was taught by Rabbi Abahu in front of Rabbi Yochanan all ??? are exempt except ??? He said to him ??? It was taught by ??? It is not ??? and if ??? to say ??? act of kindling ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? ??? on Shabbat he is liable This is only in the case ??? ??? on Shabbat is exempt And we have learned he is equivalent ??? Just as ??? that is not ??? for him

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.