It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לה,א גמרא

Even he also that is not ??? for him And we have learned is exempt because it was he is punished ??? No. ??? is equivalent that are his Just as he ??? for him Even ??? for him ??? in what way does It concerns itself He said to him Rav Aviya Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? to him ??? he is required ??? ??? and who that it is possible For This ??? yes. ??? among Rav ??? for him ??? and two ??? And they said rabbis in front of Rav ??? who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? is equivalent that are his Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: ??? is exempt This is only in the case ??? he is liable ??? is equivalent that are his ??? in what way does It concerns itself For example, ??? to cause damage As Mar said: ??? to cause damage despite the fact that did not have ??? Rava said: Our mishna in error ??? of the academy of ??? of the academy of ??? (Lev. 24) ??? a person ??? livestock Just as ??? livestock No. ??? of it between ??? between ??? between ??? between a way ??? on the way ??? money or property except ??? money or property Even ??? a person No. ??? in it between ??? between ??? between a way ??? on the way ??? money or property except ??? money or property And they said to him rabbis to Raba who seeks ??? to it in error Hey, isn't it the case that because of ??? The tanna teaches: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: immediately ??? he is punished ??? and How so? that he came he is required ??? now in error is exempt

דף לה,א משנה

ox that he was "One who pursues after ox after ??? this one says ??? and this one says No. For rather, ??? the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? they were two ??? after One of these says ??? and this one says ???

דף לה,ב משנה

both are exempt if they were both of a man one both are obligated he was one The greatness and one a child of the one who was damaged says The greatness ??? and the one who caused damage says No. For rather, a child ??? one perfect and one festival of the one who was damaged says festival ??? and the one who caused damage says No. For rather, perfect ??? the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? they were ??? two one The greatness and one a child and the demons. two one The greatness and one a child of the one who was damaged says The greatness ??? an adult male and a child ??? and the one who caused damage says No. For rather, a child an adult male The greatness ??? one perfect and one festival of the one who was damaged says festival ??? an adult male and perfect ??? and the one who caused damage says No. For rather, perfect an adult male ??? ??? the taking out from his fellow upon it ???

דף לה,ב גמרא

he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba ??? upon it ??? on ??? for he said: money or property ??? they divide He said to him R' Abba -- son of ??? to R' Chiyya son of Abba he said ??? even ??? He said to him yes. he said ??? even ??? And from where do you derive ??? he where he teaches this one says ??? and this one says No. For He disagreed with this Rav ??? at the end of the teaching, also ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, he was one The greatness and one a child one who has suffered damage says The greatness ??? says No. For rather, a child ??? one perfect and one festival one who has suffered damage says festival ??? and the one who caused damage says No. For rather, perfect ??? the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? this one No. ??? proof ??? Like that which was said by one who caused damage Let him say ??? of Rabbah son of he gave for he said: ??? to him ??? is exempt except ??? lest for he says ??? one for he says lest one If you were to say for he says one who has suffered damage ??? and he said one who caused damage lest ??? Let us say, ??? of Rabbah son of he gave except for he says one who has suffered damage lest and he said one who caused damage ??? one who has suffered damage lest ??? But the beginning of the teaching, also one who has suffered damage lest ??? and he said ??? Even if In this case, ??? that is not No. at the end of the teaching, one who has suffered damage lest ??? But the beginning of the teaching, one who has suffered damage ??? lest Hey, isn't it the case that No. is comparable But the beginning of the teaching, ??? They said: ??? lest lest ??? one the validity She ??? lest ??? two words ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rabbah said son of he gave ??? to him ??? is exempt And what can we come and learn from this? ??? to him ??? is exempt If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: is exempt ??? he is liable for the value ??? Come and learn from this. this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: they were ??? two one The greatness and one a child and etc. this one No. ??? proof ??? one who caused damage why is it that ??? to be picked up And he does not have For it was taught: Behold! this ??? on ??? from an adult male ??? from ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: he was one perfect and one festival of the one who was damaged says festival ??? an adult male and perfect ??? and the one who caused damage says No. For rather, perfect an adult male ??? ??? the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? this one No. ??? proof ??? one who caused damage But why? ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.