It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

??? Rav ??? in the name of Raba he said ??? He said to him: ??? is from that which is belonging to ??? fish from the sea ??? my field ??? Another teaching (Ex. 21) the master of the ox ??? Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean says ??? He said to him: Rabbi Akiva Behold! he says (Ex. 21) For ??? men ??? men and not ??? What he comes to say is acceptable. Rabbi Akiva Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say men and not ??? Just as men ??? Even ??? this one perfect ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the master of the ox ??? this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper Rabba said: ??? on earth. ??? heaven? except Rabba said: It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say men and not ??? Just as men ??? Even ??? is a kal vachomer ??? he returns Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the master of the ox ??? perfect is exempt ??? he is liable He said to him Abaye Except I can object with text from here: regarding ??? also Let him say thus men and not ??? Just as men ??? Even ??? he returns Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the master of the ox ??? perfect is exempt ??? he is liable And if you would say So, here, If so, Let the Tanna teach: the master of the ox ??? Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean says is exempt ??? except Abaye and Raba who both say men yes. ??? there are ??? No. ??? and not ??? he returns Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the master of the ox ??? this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper He disagreed with this Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? because ??? hangs the validity ??? hangs the validity except Rav Adda bar Ahava said men For ??? this to this even though in which there is ??? For ??? herself No. ??? and not ??? that even ??? herself ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the master of the ox ??? and thus For he came Rav ??? he came and he carried it ??? in his hands ??? of Rav ??? son of love Another teaching the master of the ox ??? Rabbi Akiva says: ??? a slave

דף מב,ב גמרא

And let him say Rabbi Akiva for his own sake Is it not the case that himself yes. ??? except ??? to the court ??? to you Rav said Shmuel son of Rav Isaac ??? What would you have said? ??? of him Come and learn from this. Because and bar ??? he even though ??? No. ??? of him If so, to Rabbi Eliezer also ??? So, here, reasoned Perhaps it has The reason is other than this ??? And let him say for him and Rabbi Eliezer also ??? for him ??? He could say to you there i.e., in another mishna he ??? ??? a person ??? Is this not son of ??? he A general principle: ??? I thought to say ??? It was necessary to provide both opinions he read ??? But here, in this case, originally son of ??? it was. It is not necessary he read even though ??? and Rabbi Akivah also certainly thus it was. except Rav Assi said: This the validity ??? Rabbah we heard for me ??? Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina You might have thought that I would say that Because and Rabbi Akiva said: Even perfect ??? must make restitution ??? damage ??? also ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: the master of the ox ??? He said to him: Rabbi Zeira for Rav, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rabbi Akiva ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Akiva says: It is possible ??? from ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ??? may he do it? to him ??? must make restitution and does not must make restitution from ??? except Rabba said: It was necessary to provide both opinions ??? I thought to say Because ??? -- more ??? proper a sela coin he gives a sela coin thirty he gives thirty and a slave proper a sela coin he gives thirty ??? also he is equivalent. a slave from ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: (Ex. 21) the master of the ox ??? It was taught: ??? of Raba the master of the ox ??? Rabbi Akiva says: ??? a slave Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference Because he is liable ??? he is liable ??? Just as ??? in it between perfect ??? Even ??? in it between perfect ??? And furthermore, is a kal vachomer for just as son of ??? all ??? in it between perfect ??? a slave that is not he gives except thirty is it not logical ??? in it between perfect ??? No. ??? -- more ??? proper a sela coin he gives a sela coin thirty he gives thirty and a slave proper a sela coin he gives thirty It is possible ??? he is liable Scripture states: the master of the ox ??? The rabbis taught: (Ex. 21) ??? a man or a woman Rabbi Akiva said: And so Just as came this ??? if ??? on the his wife ??? Behold! Already it is said (Ex. 21) For ??? ox a man or a woman except ??? a woman ??? Just as a man ??? Even a woman ??? reasoned Rabbi Akiva No. ??? to it the master of For it was taught: (Num. 27) ??? it from here ??? his wife these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Raysh Lakish said did not say except ??? Because And there is no meaning to the word ??? except after death and it was for him ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? take ??? What is the reason? Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ??? a man or a woman the ox ??? also ??? if ??? upon it ??? Rabbi Akivah did not say that it is effective. For it was taught: ??? the his wife they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? he gives damage ??? he is equivalent. ??? yes. ??? he gives ??? yes. the his wife ??? it was a maidservant ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.