It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מד,א גמרא

ox ??? the one who did in it children ??? is it not logical ??? on who were minors ??? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? a person ??? which provides he is liable ??? items shall you say ??? that is not he is liable ??? items Scripture states: (Ex. 21) or son of ??? or the daughter of ??? on who were minors ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? from where do we learn It would be a logical inference Because he is liable ??? and the woman he is liable ??? the daughter of Just as ??? and the woman No. ??? in it between perfect ??? Even ??? the daughter of No. ??? in it between perfect ??? And furthermore, ??? Just as a man and the woman which provides ??? No. ??? in it between perfect ??? son of the daughter of ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? of them between perfect ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? And so ??? if ??? if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? and the woman which provides they are obligated ??? shall you say ??? the daughter of ??? from the commandments. Scripture states: or son of ??? or the daughter of ??? ???

דף מד,א משנה

ox that he was ??? in a wall and it fell on a person ??? ??? a person ??? son of Israel ??? son of ??? is exempt

דף מד,א גמרא

Shmuel said is exempt ??? he is liable ??? and Rav said: is exempt from this and from this But why? this one perfect he Like that which was said by Rav ??? on people ??? Here in this case, also, ??? on people ??? If so, son of ??? he This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna that he saw ??? and it fell except Here in this case, What is there to say? Here in this case, also, ??? in a wall ??? of him.

דף מד,ב גמרא

??? Rav said ??? the son of of Rav ??? with one who goes of him of him This teaching is consistent with the position of Shmuel ??? of Rav there are he is liable ??? and there are he is liable ??? but exempt him ??? and there are he is liable ??? but exempt him from ??? and there are is exempt from this and from this How so? festival ??? he is liable ??? festival that did not have ??? he is liable ??? but exempt him ??? perfect ??? he is liable ??? but exempt him ??? perfect that did not have ??? is exempt from this and from this ??? that did not have ??? R' Yehudah he is obligated and R' Shimon exempts What is the reason? of Rabbi Yehudah he learns it ??? Just as ??? that did not have ??? he is liable Even ??? also that did not have ??? he is liable and Rabbi Shimon he learns it ??? Just as killed him that did not have ??? is exempt Even ??? that did not have ??? is exempt And R' Yehudah also let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? restitution from making restitution And there is no meaning to the word ??? restitution ??? and R' Shimon also let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? To exclude ??? ??? a person ??? this one ??? this ??? this he is liable Our mishna that is not like R' Shimon as it is taught: R' Shimon says even ??? this ??? this is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Shimon For scripture said: (Ex. 21) the ox ??? also ??? thus in the same way ??? the ox Just as ??? until ??? for him Even ox also until ??? for him ??? From where do we derive this? For scripture said: (Deut. 19) ??? to him and he stood upon it until ??? to him And the rabbbis This ??? to him What then does it mean when it says my slave for him They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? creates an exclusion ??? the stone ??? How so? Shall I say That there are nine ??? and one Israel among them Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? So, too, a fraction and a fraction doubt whether souls ??? it is not necessary to teach this That there are nine ??? and one ??? some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? immediately That there are one ??? some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? you shall for him ??? and all ??? on ??? he is equivalent. doubt whether souls to be lenient

דף מד,ב משנה

ox the his wife ??? ox ??? ox who can speak ox ??? ox ??? And he does not have ??? Behold! these they are obligated death R' Yehuda says: ox who can speak ox ??? ox ??? are exempt from ??? on account of that do not to them Ba'alim.

דף מד,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ox ox seven ??? ox the his wife ox ??? ox ??? ox who can speak ox ??? ox ??? And he does not have ??? R' Yehuda says: ox who can speak ox ??? ox ??? And he does not have ??? are exempt from ??? on account of that do not to them ??? Rav Huna said exempts he was Rabbi Yehudah even ??? and in the end ??? and in the end ??? From where can you derive When the baraita teaches both ox who can speak ??? And he does not have ??? ox ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? to him ??? it was. for him ox ??? we were ox who can speak we were ox ??? And he does not have ??? except Is this not Watch out for leading vav And hey, you can also come and hear from this. that even ??? and in the end ??? and in the end ??? Learn from this Another teaching is like this: ??? because of this R' Yehudah said even ??? and in the end ??? and in the end ??? is exempt as it is said (Ex. 21) ??? etc. until that it should be death ??? In justice, they agree ??? judgement No. in the case of Hey, isn't it the case that the ox ??? It would be a logical inference except I would say until that it should be death ??? In justice, ??? judgement they agree ???

דף מד,ב משנה

ox that he was he would exit ??? he does not ??? is forbidden and if before it was even the case that ??? and if ??? is permitted. ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? they would enter under ??? festival must make restitution damage ??? and perfect must make restitution ??? damage

דף מד,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: ox ??? before it was even the case that ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.