It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מז,א גמרא

??? one fourth damage ??? The reason is that is not ??? If it was it was. ??? For ??? If it was It was not but: If it was This is obvious! to us ??? For ??? completely ??? damage ??? Raba with his reasoning for he said: Raba a cow ??? What is the reason? ??? She ??? he does not ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? in reality he Rabba said: yes. ??? in its own right ??? alone by itself except ??? for the sake of a cow ??? If you say that, Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found you ??? the one who caused damage and thus you "one who finds" ??? a hand his male slave of his fellow and thus you "one who finds" ??? field of his fellow Rav Acha the son of Rabba said to Rav Ashi and if judgement he ??? one who caused damage It is because of this: for he said: for him a cow ??? a cow ??? to you This is obvious! a cow ??? a cow ??? What then does it mean when it says Rav Papa said, ??? a cow Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? he said they divide And the halacha is according to the opinion they divide

דף מז,א משנה

??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? his animal of the master of the house is exempt and if ??? of them the master of ??? he is liable and if He brought in ??? the master of ??? he is liable He brought in ??? to courtyard a householder ba'al habayit' that did not have ??? his animal of the master of the house is exempt and if ??? of them the master of the fruits? he is liable and if He brought in ??? the master of ??? he is liable He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have

דף מז,ב משנה

??? of the master of the house or ??? of the master of the house is exempt ??? he ??? of the master of the house he is liable stillborn lit., fallen ??? he is liable he was his father or his son to its midst must make restitution ??? and if He brought in ??? the master of ??? he is liable Rabbi says in all of them he is not liable until that he will accept upon it to watch

דף מז,ב גמרא

The reason is ??? this one ??? No. ??? the master of ??? his animal ??? a courtyward and we do not say ??? he has accepted the master of ??? a courtyward with whom does it agree? Rabbi She for he said: all ??? No. he has accepted upon himself ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, if He brought in ??? the master of a courtyward he is liable ??? According to the sages, that they said ??? also ??? he has accepted upon himself ??? And, too, Rabbi says in all of them he is not liable until that he will accept upon it the master of the house to watch But the beginning of the teaching, and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi ??? rabbis R' Zeira said ??? who ??? -- this refers to No. year" -- this refers to Rava said: All of it It is the rabbis' position ??? upon it the master of ??? and even ??? He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? of them but: ??? is exempt What is the reason? it was. to it that did not have It may be eaten Rav Sheshet said I thought to say For ??? Rav said: about this teaching ??? as it is taught: who gives ??? before ??? his fellow is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? he that is not ??? but: fruits ??? a person also ??? But why? ??? to it that did not have It may be eaten They said: it is the law even fruits also is exempt ??? a person But hey, come and learn from this. for even in the case where ??? also that is not ??? he is liable ??? heaven And if you wish, I would say ??? also ??? They challenged him from this teaching: the his wife ??? next to the master of the house that did not have ??? his animal of the master of the house is exempt if ??? But why? Let him say it was. to it that did not have It may be eaten They said: and who is preferable, ??? of them ??? to it What then does it mean when it says ??? to it He could say to you This is satisfactory But in our mishna, it is taught: if ??? of them ??? of them he But here, in this case, The tanna teaches: if ??? and not The tanna teaches: of them food he where he teaches And the other one He could say to you there is no difference Come and hear: He brought in ??? to courtyard a householder ba'al habayit' that did not have ??? he ate ??? did he die is exempt and if He brought in ??? the master of ??? he is liable But why? ??? that did not have shall eat Rabba said: ??? upon it And even if ??? ??? They posed this difficulty: in a case ??? upon it ??? What then? ??? he ??? upon it or, perhaps, even ??? of the world he has accepted upon himself Come and hear: For Rav learned: Yehudah son of ??? of the academy of ??? He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? came ox from someplace else ??? is exempt and if He brought in ??? he is liable one is exempt and one he is liable Is this not is exempt the master of a courtyward ??? the master of ??? They said: No. is exempt the master of the ox he is liable the master of the ox and if the master of the ox

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.