It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מח,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says that did not have ??? that it is possible They said: ??? to it ??? of the one who was damaged ??? of the one who was damaged ??? that did not have ??? to it ??? in the public domain ??? in a public domain ??? Come and hear: He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? came ox from someplace else ??? is exempt and if He brought in ??? he is liable one is exempt and one he is liable Is this not is exempt the master of a courtyward he is liable the master of a courtyward No. is exempt the master of the ox he is liable the master of the ox If so, What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says that did not have ??? that it is possible They said: So, with whom does it agree? R' Tarfon She for he said: ??? the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged damage ??? must make restitution ??? to it the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged and He will take restitution for damage ??? that did not have ??? to it the principal amount in the public domain and not ??? except ??? this particular ??? he came ??? of the Master of ??? Raba ??? he is equivalent. ??? Let us say, disagrees ??? for he said: Rav ??? to it that did not have It may be eaten They said: thus now there i.e., in another mishna that did not have ??? No. he has accepted upon himself ??? Here in this case, ??? he has accepted upon himself ??? and what is the difference here, ??? next to the master of the house that did not have ??? his animal of the master of the house is exempt and if ??? The reason is that did not have ??? this one ??? is exempt They said: ??? immediately that is not ??? something it does not require ??? upon it that are his pointed out a contradiction. ??? but: ??? immediately ??? She ??? Therefore, He ascended ??? He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of ??? Rabba said: He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? of it ??? the master of the ox he is liable ??? a courtyward and the master of a courtyward he is liable ??? the pit Even though it will be As Mar said: (Ex. 21) For ??? a man a pit and not ox a pit Here in this case, immediately is what he has ??? and not ??? like who ??? he is equivalent. Rabba said: He brought in ??? to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? the master of the house or the master of the house ??? in it he is liable ??? is exempt but on account of ??? is exempt Rav Pappa said: What then does it mean when it says ??? its implements of the master of the house ??? a pit and not ??? a pit ??? in it the vessels This is satistfactory ??? for he said: all ??? a pit he except for Rav, for he said: until ??? for him What is there to say? They said: ??? them Rabba said: enter to courtyard the master of the house that did not have ??? the master of the house or the master of the house ??? in it he is liable ??? the master of the house is exempt Thus said Rabbi ??? They did not say that except in a case There was not know of him. but: it was. know of him. ??? the master of the house he is liable What is the reason מאי טעמא It is because of this: for he said: for him ??? for there is to you ??? To exclude ??? to you ??? for he said: Raba (and there are those who say Rav ???

דף מח,ב גמרא

both ??? or both that did not have ??? this one for that one they are obligated ??? this to that are exempt The reason is ??? or both that did not have ??? but: one ??? and one that did not have ??? is exempt that did not have ??? stillborn lit., fallen ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? in the hour of ??? but: after ??? is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא you shall ox a pit and water vessels and not ??? a pit ??? in it the vessels This is satistfactory ??? for he said: all ??? a pit he except for Rav, for he said: until ??? for him What is there to say? except If it was said thus it was said: Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? is exempt What is the reason? the tooth in reality he and the tooth in reality No. ??? he was his father or his son to its midst must make restitution ??? But why? this one perfect he Rav said ??? on people ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? son of ??? he Rav Yosef said that he saw ??? and it fell Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said So, with whom does it agree? R' Yosi the Gallilean She for he said: perfect must make restitution ??? he said R' Yosi the Gallilean She for he said: ??? for he said: the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged damage ??? must make restitution So, here, ??? must make restitution This is satisfactory ??? we were where he teaches he was his father or his son to its midst except ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of his father or his son even after also ??? and if He brought in ??? the master of a courtyward he is liable ??? it was said: Rav said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? And Shmuel said Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion like Rabbi The rabbis taught: collected ??? he is liable ??? is exempt collected ??? and as for me, ??? he is liable ??? is exempt this one Back to the main body of the text: it is a problem is what you say? Do you really mean that? collected ??? he is liable ??? is exempt The reason is ??? the master of the ox but exempt him the master of a courtyward this one ??? he is liable the master of a courtyward but exempt him the master of the ox ??? he accepts upon it ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, collected ??? and as for me, ??? he is liable ??? is exempt The reason is for he said: for him and as for me, ??? he ??? the master of ??? but exempt him the master of the ox this one ??? he is liable the master of the ox but exempt him the master of a courtyward ??? No. he accepts upon it ??? to Rabbi for he said: until that he will accept upon it ??? the master of the house to watch But the beginning of the teaching, rabbis and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi R' Elazar said ??? who ??? -- this refers to No. year" -- this refers to Rava said: All of it It is the rabbis' position ??? The tanna used the wording But the beginning of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: at the end of the teaching, and as for me, ??? Rav Papa said, All of it Rabbi She derive it ??? for he said: the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged damage ??? must make restitution Therefore, He said to him: ??? No. ??? for him a place ??? for him the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged and the principal amount ??? of the one who was damaged must make restitution damage ??? did not say to him ??? for him a place ??? for him a courtyward ??? and the principal amount ??? he does not must make restitution except ??? damage

דף מח,ב משנה

ox that he was ??? to his fellow ??? the his wife they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? is exempt ??? a person that he was ??? to his fellow ??? the his wife they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? must make restitution he is equivalent. ??? How so? must make restitution he is equivalent. ??? the his wife how much She proper before it was even the case that she gave birth to and how much time is the duration of She proper ??? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.