It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נ,א גמרא

??? Rabbi Akiva reasoned a pit ??? also he is liable As it is written (Ex. 21) the master of the pit ??? is what he has ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the Merciful One and R' Yishmael reasoned the master of ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? a pit is said in the Torah for he says Rabbi Akiva ??? a pit ??? in it the scripture at first to restitution and Rav Yosef said: ??? in a personal domain the whole world does not disagree ??? What is the reason? the master of the pit the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? is what he has ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? in the public domain Rabbi Yishmael reasoned a pit in the public domain also he is liable As it is written For ??? And so ??? if on ??? he is liable on ??? not all the more so? except for upon ??? and on ??? she entered to him and Rabbi Akiva ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: For ??? then I might incorrectly say: "He opens he ??? for him ??? No. ??? for him ??? until ??? for him and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: For ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? he who seeks ??? It is because of this: ??? It once happened but: "He opens that is not a slave It once happened I would say ??? also it does not require Come and learn from this. and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? a pit is said in the Torah for he says R' Yishmael ??? a pit ??? in it the scripture at first ??? They challenged him from this teaching: One who digs a pit in the public domain ??? is exempt and even though that is not permission to do thus on account of that do not doing ??? under ??? One who digs ??? in a private domain ??? he is liable and One who digs ??? in a personal domain ??? to the public thoroughfare For example, these ??? is exempt and R' Yosi ??? Yehudah he is obligated until ??? a partition ten or until ??? a person ??? livestock four handbreadths The reason is ??? this one Is this not ??? he is liable So, with whom does it agree? This is satisfactory ??? But the beginning of the teaching, R' Yishmael and at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Akiva except According to Rav Yosef This is satisfactory at the end of the teaching, the words of all are except But the beginning of the teaching, with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi Yishmael and not Rabbi Akiva Rav would say to you Joseph All of it the words of all are She and the beginning of the teaching, that did not have ??? No. ??? and not ??? Rav Ashi said now ??? According to Rav Yosef according to the words of The entirety ??? also No. ??? R' Yishmael at the end of the teaching, also R' Yishmael and the reason ??? this one Is this not ??? he is liable For example, ??? They challenged him from this teaching: One who digs a pit in a private domain ??? he is liable in a personal domain ??? is exempt This is satisfactory ??? All of it R' Yishmael She except According to Rav Yosef This is satisfactory But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Yishmael except at the end of the teaching, with whom does it agree? No. R' Yishmael and not Rabbi Akiva He could say to you ??? these are the words of ??? The Rabbis taught ??? and he opens ??? to the public is exempt ??? and he opens and not ??? to the public he is liable and thus it is the custom of ??? that he was ??? "He opens and yielding to the public ??? the sages In the matter And they said stood i.e., as long as he lived this The halacha is -- this refers to The halacha is -- this refers to And naught else except I would say Even The halacha is ??? The rabbis taught: It once happened ??? of ??? The greatness ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? hour the first He said to them: peace the second He said to them: peace the third He said to them: is credited lit, rises Watch out for leading vav And they said to her who ??? he said to them male, of ??? for me and an elderly person one ??? They said to him: prophet you He said to them: No. prophet I myself and not son of prophet I myself except thus in the same way Watch out for leading vav And I said a thing ??? a righteous person burdened in it ??? in it ??? he said Rabbi ??? "Even though it is thus, did he die his son ??? as it is said (Ps. 50) ??? greatly This teaches ??? Blessed be he is careful with ??? even ??? R' ??? he said from here (Ps. 89) to ??? Rabbah ??? on all ??? R' Chanina said all One who says the Holy One, Who is Blessed ??? he ??? as it is said (Deut. 32) ??? For all his ways statute" Thus said Rabbi ??? (and there are those who say R' Shmuel son of Nachmeni What then does it mean that it is written

דף נ,ב גמרא

(Ex. 34) ??? and not it is written ??? Even ??? to the righteous ??? The Rabbis taught No. ??? a person ??? It once happened ??? one that he was ??? and they found a pious one one He said to him: ??? On account of what you ??? for the domain that is not ??? to domain ??? upon it ??? to sell ??? and One who was walking ??? stones he said proper He said to me: that specific a pious one On account of what you ??? for the domain that is not ??? to domain ???

דף נ,ב משנה

One who digs a pit in the public domain and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey he is liable one One who digs a pit ??? he is liable If so, why is it said a pit Just as a pit in which there is in it so that ??? ten handbreadths Even all in which there is in it so that ??? ten handbreadths they were ??? for the ten handbreadths and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt and if ??? in it he is liable

דף נ,ב גמרא

Rav said a pit ??? upon it Torah ??? and not ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? the world he ??? for him And Shmuel said ??? and how much more so ??? he said Torah and not ??? the Torah ??? on the pit and even fill ??? of wool What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? in the public domain for Rav, ??? No. ??? also ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav For scripture said: and it fell until ??? a way ??? and it fell all ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: If so, why is it said a pit Just as a pit in which there is in it so that ??? ten handbreadths Even all in which there is in it so that ??? ten handbreadths This is satisfactory ??? Even all to include ??? except for Rav, Even all it uses these particular words to include what? to include ??? clearly and explicitly The tanna teaches: them It was taught by and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? and Behold! all of them where he teaches why do I have Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was a Tanna taught: a pit then I might incorrectly say: a pit ten he that there is in it: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? I would say in a case where there are ten is not there? ??? and if a Tanna taught: ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? ten he that there is in it: ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? I would say in a case where there are ten ??? of it ??? and if It was taught by ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? in a case where there are ten he for there is of it ??? It is because of this: ??? but: ??? that is not ??? I would say in a case where there are ten ??? in them? ??? and if a Tanna taught: ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? ten he for there is in them? ??? It is because of this: ??? in them? ??? but: ??? I would say in a case where there are ten ??? in them? ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: they were ??? for the ten handbreadths and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt and if ??? in it he is liable stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? of him. ??? No. It is because of this: ??? of him. ??? If so, if ??? in it he is liable this one is not there? ??? We say: Yes! ??? and there are ??? This certain individual ??? Master ??? Rav ??? Rav Nachman said If it was ??? Master That this ??? and He went a Tanna taught: among ??? if ??? in the time of ??? No. ??? how much ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? there are ??? in less for the ten ??? Raba for Rav, ??? they were ??? for the ten handbreadths and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: ??? of him. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.