It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נב,א גמרא

immediately ??? to him ??? he bought How so? How should we understand this? If it was ??? If it was with a "chazakah" show of strength ??? with a "chazakah" show of strength In reality lit: In the world with a "chazakah" show of strength he is required to say for him to you ??? And because of the fact ??? to him ??? like who for he said: for him to you ??? he is equivalent. Raysh Lakish said It is because of this: R' ??? to his fellow immediately ??? to him ??? he bought How so? How should we understand this? If it was ??? If it was ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? he is required to say for him to you straight ??? And because of the fact ??? to him ??? like who for he said: for him to you straight ??? he is equivalent. What then does it mean when it says ??? Here in this case, ??? R' Ya'akov says ??? This certain individual ??? upon it of Rav Chisda ??? on ??? does he act? ???

דף נב,א משנה

??? came the second and they found it is revealed and not ??? the second he is liable ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt No. ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die he is liable stillborn lit., fallen before him ??? he is liable after it ??? is exempt stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox and its implements ??? a donkey and its implements ??? he is liable on ??? but exempt him on the vessels stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox A deaf person a mute and a child he is liable son of or the daughter of a slave or cubits is exempt

דף נב,א גמרא

??? until begins ??? ??? Rav said ??? And Shmuel said ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? workers? ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die ??? immediately ??? in what way does stillborn lit., fallen he said R' Isaac son of son of ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? that it is possible to stand before ??? And there is no meaning to the word It is possible to stand before ??? and they came ??? and they came ??? of him. What then does it mean when it says They said: How so? If it was ??? he and if that is not ??? he it is not necessary to teach this ??? is intermittent who say immediately ??? is intermittent ??? he ??? for him ??? or, perhaps, immediately ??? Regardless, there is not in this case. ??? he Come and hear: ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? in what way does ??? except Is this not ???

דף נב,ב גמרא

and not ??? and if ??? why is it that is exempt ??? he and if that is not ??? This is obvious! ??? he except Is this not ??? is intermittent and they came ??? and they came ??? of him. And we have learned is exempt Perhaps, immediately ??? there is not in this case. ??? he They said: No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and that he came it is a problem to you in what way does ??? R' Yitzchak said son of son of ??? Come and hear: No. ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die he is liable How so? Shall I say No. ??? and not ??? This is obvious! it's necessary to say this. ??? except Is this not ??? and not ??? How so? If it was ??? he and if that is not ??? he except Is this not ??? is intermittent and they came ??? and they came ??? of him. And we have learned he is liable Perhaps, immediately ??? is intermittent ??? he ??? for him ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? and not ??? and that he came it is a problem to you ??? he ??? The tanna used the wording But the beginning of the teaching, ??? He used the wording at the end of the teaching, also No. ??? that it is possible that they said Here, too, certainly No. ??? to us ??? is intermittent ??? he ??? for him ??? For It was necessary to us thus he ??? to us ??? that it is possible to stand before ??? and It is impossible to stand before ??? What then? who say ??? that there is ??? next to ??? you shall ??? also in the matter of ??? or, perhaps, we do not say ??? Come and hear: ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die is exempt was it said; He ascended Rabbi Yitzchak said son of son of ??? How so? Shall I say ??? This is obvious! this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper What then does it mean when it says it was. for him ??? except Is this not ??? and not ??? And we have learned is exempt Perhaps, we do not say ??? that there is ??? in the matter of ??? you shall ??? in the matter of ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and that he came it is a problem to you For ??? What then does it mean when it says it was. for him ??? What would you have said? It was necessary for him ??? upon it Come and learn from this. Come and hear: No. ??? and it fell to its midst ox or a donkey did he die he is liable How so? Shall I say No. ??? and not ??? it's necessary to say this. ??? except Is this not ??? and not ??? and if ??? he and if that is not ??? he except Is this not ??? And we have learned he is liable Perhaps, say ??? that there is ??? in the matter of ??? you shall ??? in the matter of ??? They said: No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and not ??? and they came ??? and they came ??? of him. and that he came it is a problem to you This is obvious! ??? he ??? The tanna used the wording But the beginning of the teaching, ??? He used the wording at the end of the teaching, also No. ??? Come and hear: stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox A deaf person a mute and a child ??? walking by night he is liable ??? walking by day is exempt But why? Let him say ??? in the matter of A deaf person you shall also ??? in the matter of ??? except Is this not "Hear!" of him we do not say ??? "Hear!" ??? stillborn lit., fallen before him ??? Rav said before him before him actually and really after it after him: actually and really

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.