It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נג,א גמרא

and both this and this ??? Rav with his reasoning for he said: Rav a pit ??? upon it Torah ??? and not ??? And Shmuel said ??? between before Him." between ??? he is liable Shmuel with his reasoning for he said: ??? and all the more so ??? except How so? after it ??? this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper For example, ??? and it fell ??? the pit except ??? between before him between after it he is liable ??? of Rav Rav Chisdah said give thanks Rav ??? It is because of this: for he said: for him ??? your soul If it was ??? applied to you he If it was ??? applied to you he Rava said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? and it fell ??? that which helps of him. ??? of him. Rav Yosef said: Here in this case, ??? a pit ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) What then does it mean when it says ??? ??? that is not ??? before him and there is no difference after it ??? Watch out for leading vav For Rav learned: ??? for Rav, and it fell until ??? a way ??? from here stillborn lit., fallen said before him ??? he is liable after it ??? is exempt and both this and this ??? Mar said: stillborn lit., fallen before him ??? he is liable But why? Let him say ??? for him Rav said ??? son of ??? So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Natan She for he said: the master of the pit ??? does he act? and all in a case where it is not possible ??? as it is taught: ox ??? his fellow ??? the master of the ox he is liable the master of the pit is exempt Rabbi Natan says the master of the ox must make restitution ??? and the master of the pit must make restitution ??? For it was taught: Rabbi Natan says the master of the pit must make restitution three portions and the master of the ox one fourth There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is This completely ??? a slave and that one completely ??? a slave This must make restitution a fraction and that one must make restitution a fraction And if his reasoning is This a fraction ??? a slave and that one a fraction ??? a slave the master of the pit must make restitution a fraction and the master of the ox one fourth And the other one ??? Rabba said: Rabbi Natan ??? he and it came down ??? that judgement In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is This completely ??? a slave and that one completely ??? a slave and that he came it is a problem to you to make whole This a fraction and that one a fraction It is because of this: for he said: for him the master of the ox ??? the pit ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for me If you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is This a fraction ??? a slave and that one a fraction ??? a slave and that he came it is a problem to you the master of the pit must make restitution a fraction and the master of the ox must make restitution one fourth And the other one ??? It is because of this: for he said: for him the master of the ox ??? the pit I ??? ??? What then does it mean when it says for there is for me ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for me ??? Rabba said: ??? the stone ??? the pit came ox ??? of it and it fell ??? we came ??? R' he gave And the rabbbis This is obvious! What would you have said? there i.e., in another mishna he for he said: the master of the pit ??? the ox If it was Is this not ??? applied to you it was. ??? for him But here, in this case, ??? He said to him the master of the stone ??? the pit If it was Is this not ??? applied to you ??? What then does it mean when it says it was. ??? If it was it was. ??? of it it was. stillborn lit., fallen and he arises Come and learn from this. for he said: for him If it was Is this not the stone It was not ??? it was said:

דף נג,ב גמרא

ox ??? invalid as regarding ??? ox first-born that is not ??? Abaye said must make restitution ??? Ravina he said must make restitution one fourth damage this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that like Rabbi he gave If you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one ??? this one ??? that it is possible that they said Abaye said ??? Ravina he said completely damage this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he gave If you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that like Rabbi he gave this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rabba said: ox a person ??? in the matter of ??? all of them they are obligated in the matter of four items he is equivalent. ??? a person he is liable ??? and a pit is exempt in the matter of ??? and thirty of a slave ox a person is required and a pit are exempt in the matter of vessels ??? invalid as regarding ??? a person ??? they are obligated and a pit is exempt What is the reason? Scripture states: (Ex. 21) and the dead it shall be to him ??? are his he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not the dead are his This comes to imply ??? for him to Raba Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he is required for him to Raba who seeks Raba ox invalid as regarding ??? What then? This and the dead it shall be to him ??? are his he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not the dead are his or perhaps, and the dead it shall be to him ??? he who has arrived according to ??? he returns ??? except ??? for him ??? for him from and the dead it shall be to him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? it shall be to him ??? for him ??? and the dead it shall be to him ??? for him to whoever ??? are his ??? I ??? is exempt regarding a pit Because and he exempted in it the vessels ??? is exempt regarding ox which provides he exempted in it ??? damage completely damage Regardless, No. ??? stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox and its implements ??? Our mishna that is not like R' Yehudah as it is taught: Rabbi Yehudah he is obligated on ??? vessels ??? What is the reason? is a law established by the Rabbis For scripture said: (Ex. 21) and it fell her name ox or a donkey ox and not a person a donkey and not vessels And Rabbi Yehudah or ??? the vessels And the rabbbis

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.