It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נד,א גמרא

or he had asked for him ??? And Rabbi Yehudah ??? And the rabbbis and it fell ??? I would say and it fell A general principle: ox and a donkey creates an exclusion A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? ox and a donkey yes. something other than this they do not say the master of the pit ??? and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? life, Even all ??? life, If it was Just as ??? a thing ??? imparts tumah ??? and by being carried Even any thing ??? imparts tumah ??? and by being carried but: ??? No. If so, ??? the Merciful One one ??? Which ??? If it was the writing of ox then I might incorrectly say: was sacrificed to join with the body of An altar of yes. that is not was sacrificed to join with the body of An altar of No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: a donkey ??? yes. that do not ??? No. except Scripture states: (Ex. 21) and the dead it shall be to him any thing death between According to the sages, that he came ??? them ??? or whether according to R' Yehudah that he came ??? them ??? vessels My son, death ??? They said: ??? This is ??? and for Rav, for he said: a pit ??? upon it Torah ??? and not ??? between According to the sages, between to Rabbi Yehudah vessels My son, ??? They said: In the case where it was new. ??? This and the dead it shall be to him he had asked for him ??? for he said: Raba ox invalid as regarding ??? is exempt as it is said and the dead it shall be to him ??? are his he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not the dead are his except Scripture states: (Ex. 21) silver ??? all is what he has ??? even vessels a person also Scripture states: ox and not a person a donkey and not vessels and to Rebbi Yehudah that he came ??? them ??? This is satisfactory ox ??? of him. a person except a donkey What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. except Rabba said: a donkey ??? to Rabbi Yehudah ??? according to the words of The entirety ??? stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox A deaf person a mute and a child ??? What then does it mean when it says ox A deaf person a mute and a child Shall I say ox of A deaf person ox of a mute ox of a child this one ox of ??? is exempt Rabbi Yochanan said: ox that he was A deaf person ox that he was a mute ox that he was a child

דף נד,ב גמרא

this one ox that he was ??? is exempt he said R' ??? No. -- why must that case be taught as well? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. -- why must that case be taught as well? ox that he was ??? but: ox A deaf person a mute and a child I would say ??? to him ??? to him ??? Come and learn from this. He said to him Rav Acha ??? For it was taught: stillborn lit., fallen to its midst son of the understanding of is exempt Is this not ox son of the understanding of He said to him No. a person Except I can object with text from here: a person son of the understanding of he this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper this one Is this not son of the understanding of he ??? ox and not a person it is written Rather, what can we conclude? son of the understanding of ??? son of the understanding of He said to him For it was taught: stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox son of the understanding of is exempt except Rabba said: ox This is only in the case A deaf person ox This is only in the case a mute ox This is only in the case a child ??? but: ox This is only in the case ??? is exempt What is the reason? who seeks for him ??? Another teaching is like this: stillborn lit., fallen to its midst ox A deaf person a mute and a child ??? walking by night he is liable ??? walking by day is exempt

דף נד,ב משנה

one ox and one all livestock ??? the pit ??? a mountain ??? a lost item ??? and to Shabbat and thus raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? If so, why is it said ox or a donkey except ??? the scripture ???

דף נד,ב גמרא

??? the pit (Ex. 21) silver ??? it is written all is what he has ??? a mountain ??? (Ex. 19) if livestock if a man No. ??? raw lit., living are in the general category livestock ??? if ??? ??? since we say: (Ex. 22) on any thing ??? A general principle: any thing ??? a lost item (Deut. 22) for all ??? your brother ??? he learns it a donkey a donkey ??? he learns it ox ox ??? If it was ??? he learns it ox ox ??? If it was ??? he learns it ??? and regarding Sabbath From where do we derive this? as it is taught: R' Yosei says It is because of this: R' Yishmael ??? it is said (Ex. 20) Your servant ??? it is said (Deut. 5) ??? and all ??? Is it not the case that ox and a donkey are in the general category all livestock they were and for what reason they have fulfilled the mitzvah to say to you Just as ox and a donkey is said here, raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? Even all raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? I would say livestock ??? A general principle: ??? creates an exclusion A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? ox and a donkey yes. something other than this they do not say and all ??? and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? life, Even all ??? life, and so go ahead and say Just as ??? a thing ??? become tamei ??? and by being carried Even any thing ??? become tamei ??? and by being carried but: ??? they do not say If so, ??? the Merciful One one ??? Which ??? the Merciful One If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ox ??? was sacrificed to join with the body of An altar of yes. that is not was sacrificed to join with the body of An altar of it is not written: the Merciful One a donkey and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: a donkey ??? yes. that do not ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ox except and all ??? he and all in a case ??? the Merciful One all ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that regarding tithe As it is written all ??? for him are in the general category and creates an exclusion as it is taught: (Deut. 14) ??? in all who ??? your soul A general principle: in the morning ??? and For a payment creates an exclusion and with all who ??? your soul and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? Even all ??? They said: in all ??? all ??? If you wish, I would say all also ??? he ??? This all ??? he ??? for him ??? as it is written ??? "and the writing of and all ??? Learn from this ??? now that you said all ??? he ??? and a donkey ??? Why do I need They said: ox ??? ox ox ??? a donkey ??? a donkey a donkey ??? If so, even a person ??? Why is it that We have learnt in a Mishna: a person is permitted. with all of them ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? The reason is for it is the case that the validity ??? Rav Acha son of Ya'akov Scripture states: (Deut. 5) so that ??? Your servant ??? and not for a matter of ??? He asked Rabbi ??? son of ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba On account of what ??? It is not said at them." good ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.