Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף נה,א גמרא
it is said regarding them good He said to him: until that you ??? why is it said at them." good ??? if it is said of them good or not. ??? know if it is said of them good or not. ??? next to R' ??? son of ??? that he was he is regularly accustomed next to R' Yehoshua son of Levi that he was ??? He went ??? He said to him from him No. I hear except thus said for me Shmuel son of ??? my brother of its mother of Rav Acha the son of Rabbi Chanina And there are those who say it was ??? of its mother of Rav my brother the son of Rabbi Chanina Because ??? And so ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall Rav Ashi said ??? and peace a division from that is good from Israel R' Yehoshua said: the one who sees ??? a sign of proper to him What is the reason מאי טעמא Shall I say It is because of this: As it is written good I would say (Is. 14) ??? one ??? we say it. I would say (Lam. 1) ??? we say it. I would say (Lam. 2) ??? in the land." ??? except Because and he opens in it the scripture ??? until (Gen. 1) fears God the fire lit., the light No. it is written ??? and R' Yehoshua ben Levi said: the one who sees ??? upon it from the heavens ??? What case is he dealing with? ??? and thus raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? ??? he said Reish Lakish: here, year" Rabbi a rooster ??? this to that This is obvious! Rav said ??? It is because of this: ??? together What would you have said? ??? one he ??? Shmuel said ??? the wheat ??? this to that He disagreed with this Raba son of Rav ??? What is the reason? Shall I say It is because of this: That this ??? and that one ??? Except I can object with text from here: a camel ??? and a camel ??? That this mighty ones..." ??? and that one ??? Here, too, where they did ??? this to that except Abayye said: this ??? and this ??? Rav Papa said, this one require one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that require how much ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Raysh Lakish said ??? two heretics, ??? What is the reason? Rav Adda bar Ahava said in the name because of Ulla We come to compare ??? he is required ??? the one who accustoms ??? What then? who say immediately ??? No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down in the sea ??? No. ??? No. anything does he act? or, perhaps, now Regardless, ??? leading ??? He disagreed with this Ravina Except I can object with text from here: ??? in his hand and seed ??? in the land." ??? "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel Here, too, ??? They said: thus now there i.e., in another mishna earth a place ??? No. a place ??? Here in this case, This and this ??? he
דף נה,ב משנה
the one who marries ??? in front of it ??? is exempt No. ??? in front of it ??? he is liable ??? by night or ??? is exempt ??? they are obligated ??? or ??? a mute and a child ??? he is liable ??? enter ??? beneath it "She has fallen ??? Just as ??? Just as ??? How so? ??? Just as ??? the house of ??? field how much it was proper and how much time is the duration of She proper R' Shimon says ??? fruits ??? fruits ??? if ??? if ???
דף נה,ב גמרא
The Rabbis taught Who is ??? and Who is that did not have ??? to stand ??? that is not would find it possible to stand ??? that did not have ??? Thus said Rabbi with whom does it agree? son of ??? Which Tanna taught: festival ??? for him ??? Rabbi Yehudah She For it was taught in a baraita ??? before him ??? and went out ??? one perfect and one festival he is liable These are the words of Rabbi Meir. R' Yehuda says: perfect he is liable festival is exempt as it is said (Ex. 21) and not ??? is this Rabbi Eliezer says he (guarding) does not have except ??? even you say ??? that I ??? and a foot ??? for he said: R' Elazar -- and others say it is in a baraita -- four items the Torah ??? and they are a pit and fire ??? and a foot a pit As it is written (Ex. 21) For ??? a man a pit or For ??? a man a pit and not ??? this one ??? is exempt fire As it is written (Ex. 22) ??? the act of kindling ??? until that He performs similar to act of kindling ??? As it is written (Ex. 22) ??? in the field after until that He performs similar to ??? a foot As it is written ??? until that He performs similar to ??? and it was taught: ??? this ??? And thus it says (Is. 32) ??? a foot the ox ??? this ??? And thus it says (I Kings 14) as it was ??? until ??? The reason is that He performs similar to ??? this one No. does he act? did not say Rabbah Our mishna also ??? where he teaches ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and comes ??? ox what is the difference here, where he teaches ??? Is this not It is because of this: ??? Is this not It is because of this: ??? the principal amount No. ??? of it ??? and a foot it is written: of him. So come and learn from this. ??? and a foot ??? he ??? It was taught: he said R' Yehoshua four items One who makes those particular is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven and they are ??? hedge before ??? his fellow ??? of his fellow before ??? that is false ??? giving witness to his fellow and does not he testified ??? Mar said: ??? hedge before ??? his fellow How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say in a wall ??? a person also ??? except
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.