It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נו,א גמרא

in a wall ??? Mar said: ??? of his fellow before ??? How so? Shall I say ??? for him ??? a person also ??? except ??? that is not ??? and Rav Ashi said: ??? was it said; It is because of this: ??? Mar said: ??? that is false How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say for his own sake ??? he is required ??? a person also ??? except ??? giving witness to his fellow and does not he testified to him with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? two This is obvious! a law established by the Torah he (Lev. 5) if No. ??? and exalted. ??? except it is dealing with a case where there is only one. And, too, there is not in this case. ??? One who makes ??? his fellow ??? One who makes work ??? A sin-offering ??? A sin-offering is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? who gives ??? before ??? his fellow is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? ??? in the hand of A deaf person a mute and a child is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? his fellow is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? in the public domain and not ??? "She has fallen ??? and not ??? he is obligated ??? but the sages say is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven yes. from this that it is possible ??? and Behold! ??? for him What would you have said? ??? heaven also No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? hedge before ??? his fellow What would you have said? immediately ??? he arises Just as does he act? ??? heaven also No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? of his fellow also What would you have said? Let us say, who it was. ??? That it comes wind of that is not ??? heaven also No. ??? Come and learn from this. to Rav Ashi for he said: also ??? it was said: What would you have said? I ??? heaven also No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? that is false also What would you have said? Let us say, these are the words of ??? these are the words of ??? these are the words of who ??? heaven also No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? giving witness to his fellow and does not he testified to him also What would you have said? who ??? and so when it was. ??? for him it was. give thanks Perhaps it was. ??? heaven also No. ??? by night or ??? Rabbah said This is only in the case ??? but not ??? What then does it mean when it says he is liable How so? Shall I say in a wall ??? For No. ??? why is it that he is liable What then does it mean when it says ??? except in a wall ??? For ??? why is it that is exempt ??? he This is satistfactory ??? is exempt except ??? he is liable What is there to say? except ??? in a wall ??? and even No. ??? And so it was said: of Rabbah ??? it was said: ??? or ??? a mute and a child and Came forth ??? he is liable Rabbah said And even if ??? No. -- why must that case be taught as well? in a case that is not ??? he except Even if ??? also What would you have said? ??? to it ??? Come and learn from this. ??? She What is the reason מאי טעמא for he said: for him ??? you knew. ??? all ??? for there is to it ??? they are obligated

דף נו,ב גמרא

This is obvious! immediately ??? to it ??? for all words it is not necessary to teach this ??? to it ??? This is like for he said: Rava said: Rav Matanah: Rav said ??? his fellow on ??? his fellow he is liable ??? This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this ??? to it ??? Abaye said to him: According to Rav Yosef ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? to us ??? also ??? enter ??? They said: beneath it ??? Shall I say beneath it ??? livestock ??? one ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? all of them they would enter under ??? except beneath it ??? that came first ??? for him ??? Let us say, ??? of Raba for he said: Raba ??? he is liable He could say to you Raba What then does it mean when it says ??? ??? that it is possible that they said When the baraita teaches ??? and not The tanna teaches: ??? after Learn from this What then does it mean when it says ??? ??? but: after No. Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: to Raba for he said: Raba ??? he is liable They said: No. Perhaps ??? The tanna teaches: and it is the law ??? it was said: ??? a lost item Rava said: ??? although we don't deserve it. he is equivalent. Rav Yosef said: ??? he is equivalent. Rava said: ??? although we don't deserve it. he is equivalent. What then does it mean when it says benefit ??? for him Rav Yosef said: ??? he is equivalent. ??? benefit that is not ??? for him ??? you shall ??? that it is possible ??? thus Rav Yosef said: ??? he is equivalent. immediately ??? the master of ??? Therefore, ??? he is equivalent. ??? He returned it In reality lit: In the world ??? Chiyya is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? Rav Yosef refuted Rabbah

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.