It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נז,א גמרא

He returned it to the place ??? he is not liable ??? of it ??? or it was lost misplaced he is liable ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? or it was lost misplaced Is this not ??? from his house and it was lost misplaced from his house No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: he is not liable ??? of it He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? and two The tanna teaches: And this is what the tanna means to teach: He returned it morning, to the place ??? he departs and he will see to it he is not liable ??? of it He returned it ??? to the place ??? that is not ??? he departs that is not Look, to it ??? or it was lost misplaced he is liable ??? In reality lit: In the world he he is liable until ??? Watch out for leading vav And what do we mean by "always"? Is this not even from his house Learn from this ??? the reward for he is equivalent. He said to him ??? to you ??? life, ??? them ??? he is required ??? Rabbah According to Rav Yosef (Deut. 22) ??? yes. for me except in his house ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? from all a place What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? we were his house except This is obvious! ??? that is not ??? that is not ??? Learn from this ??? although we don't deserve it. he is equivalent. He said to him In reality lit: In the world ??? and that he came it is a problem to you we were his house It is to learn from this that is not in the case of the understanding of ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? The entirety they all require the understanding of ??? except ??? a lost item for behold! ??? in it Torah ??? in great quantity He said to him Abaye According to Rav Yosef and No. ??? a lost item ??? although we don't deserve it. he is equivalent. for this statement that Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said poses a contradiction: Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? claims ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? the reward for you shall why is it that must make restitution restitutions for ??? he is required ??? He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? claims ??? He said to him ??? a thief he He said to him for I say ??? immediately ??? he ???

דף נז,ב גמרא

No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? although we don't deserve it. which provides must make restitution restitutions for ??? shall you say ??? the reward for that is not must make restitution restitutions for ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? he Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? the reward for must make restitution restitutions for ??? claims ??? He said to him thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? although we don't deserve it. which provides must make restitution restitutions for ??? in all ??? shall you say ??? the reward for that is not must make restitution restitutions for ??? except ??? claims ??? (Ex. 22) ??? or did he die yes. for me except ??? a lost item from where do we learn is what you say? Do you really mean that? is a kal vachomer for just as ??? the reward for ??? in it ??? he is liable ??? a lost item he asks ??? in the case of lame ??? is it not logical ??? a lost item ??? is a kal vachomer that do not upon it a response And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? he why is it that yes. upon it a response that it is possible to find fault with this argument Just as ??? the reward for which provides must make restitution restitutions for ??? claims ??? He said to him his reasoning is This a Tanna taught: ??? without ??? is preferable, ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? a cow from his fellow ??? and he said ??? must make restitution Really? "and after this has sworn Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? the reward for he is equivalent. and When the baraita teaches and he said ??? must make restitution Really? "from this general principle it would follow has sworn So if he wished, he exempted for him ??? How so? How should we understand this? For example, that he came ??? claims ??? And we have learned and after this Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? Learn from this ??? he They said: Who deduces like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? the reward for he is equivalent. Perhaps like Rabbi Meir he reasons, for he said: ??? although we don't deserve it. he is equivalent. If you wish, I would say ??? Rabbah son of Avuah It was taught by ??? How so? must make restitution Rabbi Meir says: ??? the reward for Rabbi Yehudah says ??? although we don't deserve it. Rabbi Zeira he said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? claims ??? and it is found ??? that is not ??? "She has fallen ??? Just as ??? Rav said ??? but: ??? even Just as ??? It is not ??? Let us say, Rav with his reasoning for he said: Rav he was to it that did not have It may be eaten They said: thus now ??? for he said: Rav there i.e., in another mishna he was to it that did not have It may be eaten in a case ??? She ??? He said to him Master ??? No. ??? he was to it that did not have It may be eaten ??? She ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? except

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.