It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ס,א גמרא

??? a lamp ??? certainly It once happened that are his ??? in the hand of ??? he is liable ??? he said ??? son of Isaac The one who teaches ??? No. ??? and The one who teaches ??? No. ??? The one who teaches ??? No. ??? As it is written (Ex. 3) ??? fire and The one who teaches ??? No. ??? As it is written (Is. 57) created ??? all of them ??? The Rabbis taught ??? if there are ??? so that ??? he is liable And if not, is exempt why is it that ??? wind of ??? Abayye said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? one ??? after Rava said: For example, ??? that is not ??? R' Zeira he said For example, ??? Rav Ashi said: For say throws wind of ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in the matter of Sabbath ??? Torah But here, in this case, the tooth in reality he and the tooth ??? is exempt

דף ס,א משנה

??? ??? pieces of wood or stones or ??? he is liable as it is said (Ex. 22) For ??? fire ??? and is eaten ??? or ??? or the field ??? the act of kindling ???

דף ס,א גמרא

Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? he ??? the Merciful One It is because of this: ??? fire ??? but: ??? that is not ??? fire ??? and not ??? I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? he is liable the Merciful One It is because of this: ??? is greater than he but: ??? I would say No. ??? why do I have Just as ??? Even all ??? and according to R' Yehudah ??? in fire ??? why do I have ??? all ??? And the rabbbis ??? all ??? them ??? them ??? And Rabbi Yehudah or should bring himself ??? And the rabbbis ??? them ??? them ??? the field And Rabbi Yehudah ??? the Merciful One or ??? the writing of or the field field why do I have to include ??? its stones and let the Merciful One write in the Torah field and it does not require ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: field then I might incorrectly say: Just as ??? yes. something other than this No. Come and learn from this. ??? son of Nachmeni R' Yonatan said yes. ??? she entered In reality lit: In the world except at a time i.e., in a case ??? in the world" It is not ??? except from the righteous at first as it is said For ??? fire ??? when does the previous statement apply? fire ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? to it It is not ??? except from the righteous at first as it is said and is eaten ??? he ate ??? It is not said except and is eaten ??? Rav Yosef What then does it mean that it is written (Ex. 12) and you No. ??? a man ??? his house until mornings immediately ??? is a voluntary act ??? he does not ??? between righteous ??? and not only this, but ??? from the righteous at first as it is said (Ezek. 21) and the Kerati from you a righteous person a wicked person crying Rav Yosef all this also ??? He said to him Abaye ??? he ??? As it is written (Is. 57) For because of the evil ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said

דף ס,ב גמרא

In reality lit: In the world a person shall enter crying good and went out crying good as it is said (Ex. 12) and you No. ??? a man ??? his house until mornings The Rabbis taught a thing in the city ??? as it is said and you No. ??? a man ??? his house until mornings And it is said: (Is. 26) to you with me" came ??? And it is said: (Deut. 32) ??? Why "And it is said"? I.e., why do I need both prooftexts? And if you say that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? No. Come and hear: to you with me" came ??? And if you say that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: in a case That there are ??? For he departs ??? between ??? in reality ??? from upon me Come and hear: ??? even though ??? Raba in the time of ??? you shall ??? as it is written (Jer. 9) For He ascended ??? The Rabbis taught famine in the city ??? as it is said (Gen. 12) And it was famine in the land." He descended Avram ??? in that place And it is said: (II Kings 7) if ??? the city ??? in the city ??? in that place Why "And it is said"? I.e., why do I need both prooftexts? And if you say that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case ??? doubt whether souls but: in a case That there are doubt whether souls No. Come and hear: (II Kings 7) Let them go "She has fallen to the camp of ??? if ??? The Rabbis taught a thing in the city to shall it go a person in the midst of ??? because of ??? walking in the midst of ??? for him ??? peace in the city to shall it go ??? the road. ??? the one who does not have ??? The Rabbis taught a thing in the city to a person shall enter an individual to the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue ??? in that place its implements and that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case that is not ??? of him. ??? and not ??? of him. ten The Rabbis taught dogs ??? the angel of death came to city dogs ??? Elijah "The prophet came to city and that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? in them? ??? Rav Ami Rav ??? in front For R' Isaac ??? Master, He said to him Let us say, Master, that he brought Master, He said to him Let us say, Master, ??? he opens to say ??? and not ??? Master, he opens to say that he brought and not ??? Master, He said to them: I will tell a parable to you One may compare it to what? The matter is comparable to a person in which there is to him two women One she gave birth to and one ??? she gave birth to ??? to him ??? to him ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ??? from here and from here i.e., on both sides of the passage He said to them: If so, I would say Let them go a saying ??? (Ex. 22) For ??? fire ??? the act of kindling ??? The Holy One, Who is Blessed, said by the to make whole ??? I ??? fire in Zion as it is said (Lam. 4) ??? fire in Zion It may be eaten ??? and as for me, future ??? in fire as it is said (Zech. 2) and as for me, ??? to it the wall of fire round and round ??? that he brought he opens the scripture ??? and he closes ??? to say to you ??? It is because of this: ??? (II Sam 23) ??? David and he said who ??? water ??? the house of bread who ??? Watch out for leading vav that the Philistines ??? water ??? the house of bread who ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Rabba said: he said ??? in fire ??? for him If it was like R' Yehudah If it was ??? for him What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Rav Huna he said ??? of Israel are they, where they did ??? Watch out for leading vav that the Philistines in them? ??? for him What then? ??? himself ??? his fellow ??? for him is forbidden ??? himself ??? his fellow but: you a king you ??? to do to him a way And there is no meaning to the word ??? in his hand And the rabbbis (and there are those who say Rabbah son of ??? And they said ??? of Israel are they, ??? them What then? to be picked up ??? of ??? of Israel to give before his animal in order to make whole ??? of ??? for him (Ezek. 33) ??? a wicked person ??? despite the fact ??? must make restitution a wicked person he but: you a king you a king ??? to do to him a way And there is no meaning to the word ??? in his hand This is satisfactory for one for he said: ??? it is written one he read (II Sam 23) and she became in that place ??? the field ??? and then it is written one he read (I Chron. 11) and she became ??? the field ??? except for one for he said: ??? What then does it mean when it says They posed this difficulty: ??? two ??? He could say to you where they did also ??? of Israel where they did ??? in them? Watch out for leading vav that the Philistines This is satisfactory for one for he said: ??? it is written (II Sam 23) ??? in the midst of ??? except ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? that is not ??? them ??? This is satisfactory Behold! both it is written two ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.