It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סז,א גמרא

this one Is this not thus he returns ??? Rav Yosef said At the beginning, was his name upon it as it is taught: (Ezek. 41) ??? the house these ??? these ??? Rabbi Zeira he said who changes ??? the Name shall not be who changes who changes the Name that is not he returns ??? who you shall who changes Consider this case: ??? originally ??? and now ??? and it was taught: ??? and in the end ??? invalidates it ??? and in the end ??? he does not invalidates it ??? And if you say who changes the Name the validity She Even if ??? and in the end ??? also Subject to disqualification, that I ??? She If so, even that at the beginning of the teaching also there i.e., in another mishna that it is possible ??? implements of upon it ??? Here in this case, yes. ??? implements of upon it ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? terumah ??? tithe They said: there i.e., in another mishna that it is possible who changes the Name originally ??? and now terumah that which was sanctified for Temple use from the beginning Those who are ill and now that which was sanctified for Temple use Rav Chisdah said R' Yonatan said ??? that he was he acquires as it is said (Lev. 5) ??? ??? Just as Scripture states: who ??? if similar to ??? he returns And if not, ??? in reality he is required ??? This who ??? his father that is not ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth on ??? his father If so, ??? the Merciful One ??? ??? who ??? why do I have ??? Learn from this both and there are that they said Rav Chisdah said R' Yonatan said ??? that is not he acquires as it is said ??? ??? In any case, Hey, isn't it the case that it is written who ??? This certain individual should bring himself on ??? are his ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth And there is no meaning to the word ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth on ??? Ulla said ??? that is not he acquires as it is said (Mal. 1) ??? the Paschal offering and an ill person ??? is equivalent ??? Just as Passover the one who does not have ??? A general principle:

דף סז,ב גמרא

Even ??? the one who does not have ??? there is no difference before ??? and there is no difference after ??? Rava said: from here its sacrifice and not that is stolen begins ??? Shall I say before ??? This is obvious! why do I have he read except Is this not after ??? so learn from this ??? No. ??? Learn from this Hey, isn't it the case that Raba he for he said: ??? sacrifice ??? If you wish, I would say he returns of him. And if you wish, I would say one ??? Rav ??? and the attribute of restitutions for four and five ??? But why? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ox ox ??? Just as there raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? Even here, raw lit., living and "uf" is subject to the same laws as them ??? Rabba said: Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ox ??? ox ??? two occasions ox ??? yes. something other than this they do not say Which ??? Shall I say ox ??? the Merciful One For ??? ox or ??? five mornings ??? beneath it and four ??? beneath it If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: thus then I might incorrectly say: he is required ??? nine for all one and one And if you say this one it is written beneath it beneath it one beneath it ??? This certain individual should bring himself ??? other than this as it is taught: It is possible ??? ox the value of a maneh worth one hundred dinars ??? beneath it ??? Scripture states: beneath it beneath it except ox ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? the Merciful One For ??? a man ??? five mornings ??? under the ox and four ??? under ??? If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: thus then I might incorrectly say: until ??? two ??? them ??? it is written ??? and so go ahead and say until ??? both of them. ??? them ??? it is written ??? and so go ahead and say then I might incorrectly say: until ??? two ??? one ??? one or ??? it is written ??? then I might incorrectly say: until ??? both of them. ??? one ??? one or ??? one ??? one except ox ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? the Merciful One For ??? a man ox ??? five mornings ??? beneath it and four ??? under ??? ox ??? that at the beginning of the teaching why do I have Learn from this ox ??? yes. something other than this ??? yes. ??? after ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except before ??? but: after ??? two must make restitution restitutions for ??? Rav Sheshet said I thought to say For ??? Rav said: about this teaching ??? as it is taught: R' Akiva said On account of what he said Torah ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five because of ??? begins ??? Shall I say before ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.