It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סח,א גמרא

who that it is possible ??? except after ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? why is it that must make restitution restitutions for four and five are his he ??? are his he sell They said: Like that which was said by Raba because of ??? Here in this case, also, because of ??? Come and hear: (Ex. 21) ??? or ??? Just as ??? that is not ??? Even ??? that is not ??? begins ??? Shall I say before ??? why is it that It is not ??? except after ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? why is it that must make restitution four And Hashem are his he ??? are his he sell Like that which was said by Rav ??? creates an exclusion ??? in every thirty days Here in this case, also, creates an exclusion ??? in every thirty days They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? and the second he does not must make restitution except the principal amount only. ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and the second must make restitution restitutions for ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for four And Hashem and the second he does not must make restitution restitutions for ??? except the principal amount only. The tanna teaches: from this ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for four And Hashem and the second must make restitution restitutions for ??? begins ??? Shall I say before ??? two why is it that must make restitution restitutions for ??? who changes is a voluntary act without ??? who that it is possible ??? except This is obvious! after ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? he acquires why is it that must make restitution restitutions for four And Hashem that are his he ??? And, too, where he teaches But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? and the second yes. must make restitution except the principal amount ??? after ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? he acquires two why is it that he does not must make restitution except the principal amount except Is this not Learn from this ??? No. ??? It is a difficulty for Rav's position. Rabba said: ??? this one ??? She Rather, that which was taught at the end of the teaching, ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and a second person he does not must make restitution except the principal amount and who that it is possible ??? who changes It once happened No. ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, All of it before ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? and so go ahead and say thus ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and the second he does not must make restitution except the principal amount ??? is a voluntary act without ??? No. ??? and someone else came ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and the second must make restitution restitutions for ??? It once happened Rav Papa said, In reality lit: In the world No. ??? at the end of the teaching, the academy of Shammai She that they said who changes in its place ??? If so, it is a problem But the beginning of the teaching, ??? for Rav, Thus said Rabbi ??? In reality lit: In the world All of it before ??? and not ??? and not you say It is because of this: ??? who changes is a voluntary act except even ??? also ??? regarding ??? except that is not ??? both of them. ??? two except ??? it was said: ??? before ??? Rav ??? he said he is liable Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said is exempt Rav ??? he said he is liable ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says Hey, isn't it the case that ??? there is no difference before ??? there is no difference after ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said is exempt ??? after ??? he ??? but: before ??? that is not ??? No. ??? is equivalent ??? in the case of ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: Rabbi Akiva said: On account of what he said Torah ??? must make restitution four And Hashem because of ??? begins ??? Shall I say before ??? who that it is possible ??? except Is this not after ??? he Rabba said: because of ??? Come and hear: ??? Just as ??? that is not ??? Even ??? that is not ??? begins ??? Shall I say before ??? why is it that It is not ??? except after ??? so learn from this ??? after ??? he He explains -- Rav ??? creates an exclusion ??? to him in every thirty days And even R' Elazar reasoned ??? after ??? he for he said: R' Elazar

דף סח,ב גמרא

Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? he for behold! he said Torah ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and Perhaps No. ??? except Is this not It is because of this: ??? She and Perhaps Even though it will be that is not ??? They said: No. You might have thought is equivalent ??? Just as ??? Even ??? and if before ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? and Perhaps ??? They said: No. You might have thought is equivalent ??? Just as ??? Even ??? He said to him R' Yochanan ??? that do not ??? he is liable from this general principle it would follow ??? Rabbi Yochanan before ??? he is liable after ??? What then does it mean when it says R' Yochanan said: he is liable ??? he said is exempt Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he is liable ??? between before ??? between after ??? he said is exempt ??? before ??? he but: after ??? he bought are his he ??? are his he sell ??? R' Yochanan ??? and after this ??? must make restitution restitutions for ??? and does not must make restitution restitutions for four and five begins ??? ??? before ??? who ??? (Lev. 27) a man For ??? his house and that which was sanctified for Temple use the Merciful One in the Torah says Just as his house are his Even all are his except This is obvious! after ??? and the reason ??? he ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and so when ??? but not ??? must make restitution restitutions for four and five and if You might have thought ??? he acquires why is it that must make restitution are his he ??? are his he sell He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? in the hand of ??? and who ??? For didn't R' Yochanan say ??? and not ??? are not it is possible for them ??? this on account of that is not are his and this on account of that is not ??? They said: he for he said: ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? and say all ??? from this ??? on ??? Consider this case: ??? the principal amount ??? In justice, How so? If it was that they said "Go!" give to him why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even No. ??? also No. ??? for he said: Raba "Go!" give to him ??? is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא immediately ??? it was. for him a thief and a thief he does not must make restitution restitutions for four and five

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.