It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עא,א גמרא

even thus immediately that he came ??? for him ??? by day ??? They said: why is it that ??? there is not in this case. ??? from this that it is possible ??? and He will take restitution for They said: So, with whom does it agree? ??? She for he said: ??? and He will take restitution for If it was ??? even ??? on Shabbat And if you say ??? and He will take restitution for it has did he die and He will take restitution for he does not have and not For it was taught: ??? on Shabbat ??? ox ??? must make restitution four and five These are the words of Rabbi Meir. and the sages ??? They said: son of ??? for it is the case that was it said; He ascended Thus said Rabbi Ya'akov that R' Yochanan said And there are those who say it was Thus said Rabbi ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish said: Rabbi Avin: And Rabbi ??? and all ??? in the name of Rabbi Yochanan They said: ??? by way of lit., through the hands of after And so this a sinner and this ??? Rabba said: that I Here in this case, For scripture said: (Ex. 21) ??? Just as ??? by way of lit., through the hands of after Even ??? by way of lit., through the hands of after of the academy of R' Yishmael a Tanna taught: or ??? ??? of the academy of ??? a Tanna taught: under ??? ??? He disagreed with this Mar Zutra who that it is possible something For this does he act? ??? No. ??? and does he act? ??? Rav Ashi said to him there i.e., in another mishna Is this not It is because of this: that is not ??? he except ??? for him ??? of him and if ??? by way of lit., through the hands of after What is the reason מאי טעמא is a law established by the Rabbis ??? They said: one the sages Rabbi Shimon for he said: ??? that is not ??? No. her name ??? They said: This is satisfactory idolatry ??? that is not ??? She except Sabbath ??? She For it was taught in a baraita ??? on Shabbat by day ??? despite the fact ??? They said: derive it like Rabbi Yochanan ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah says in error shall eat at the conclusion of the Sabbath with intent does not eat ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? says in error shall eat ??? Sabbath to others and not to him with intent does not eat ??? No. to him and not to others What is the reason מאי טעמא of R' Yochanan ??? Rabbi Chiyya ??? of the academy of ??? (Ex. 31) ??? the Sabbath For and that which was sanctified for Temple use She to you Just as and that which was sanctified for Temple use is forbidden in cases regarding eating Even It once happened Sabbath are forbidden in cases regarding eating If it was Just as and that which was sanctified for Temple use is forbidden to benefit from it Even It once happened Sabbath is forbidden to benefit from it Scripture states: to you ??? It is possible even in error Scripture states: (Ex. 31) ??? shall certainly die" with intent Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not in error They disagreed about this, Rav Acha and Ravina One says It once happened Sabbath a law established by the Torah and one says It once happened Sabbath is a law established by the Rabbis ??? a law established by the Torah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis Scripture states: and that which was sanctified for Temple use he he and that which was sanctified for Temple use And there is no meaning to the word ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use This is satisfactory ???

דף עא,ב גמרא

??? rabbis except ??? is a law established by the Rabbis why is it that ??? rabbis ??? and Rabbi Meir why is it that he is obligated ??? immediately ??? of it ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? benefit he and not ??? that are his ??? Rabba said: in the case of one who says ??? he ??? ox ??? benefit ??? Is this not ??? that are his ??? Rabba said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? in the house of ??? in the house of ??? in the house of ??? derive it like Rabbi Ya'akov and he reasons, like R' Shimon derive it like Rabbi Ya'akov for he said: Even ??? derive it like Rabbi Shimon for he said: a thing ??? he is equivalent. For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Shimon says: holy offerings ??? to replace them he is liable Perhaps, a thing ??? he is equivalent. Rav said ??? in front of Rav ??? who seeks ??? Our mishna like Rabbi Meir and not like Rabbi Shimon Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Shimon exempts with two these from this general principle it would follow ??? Our mishna give thanks He said to him No. from this general principle it would follow ??? for healing ??? is from that which is belonging to his father ??? Raba brought this very question ??? ox of two ??? to one from them What then? (Ex. 21) five mornings the Merciful One in the Torah says and not five ??? mornings or, perhaps, five mornings the Merciful One in the Torah says and even five ??? mornings He said to him five mornings the Merciful One in the Torah says and not five ??? mornings ??? is from that which is belonging to his father ??? and after this did he die his father must make restitution restitutions for four and five Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, immediately ??? his father just as ??? to one from them he is equivalent. And we have learned must make restitution restitutions for four and five He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? his father In justice, but not he stood In justice, What then does it mean when it says he does not must make restitution restitutions for four and five If so, ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? is from that which is belonging to his father did he die and after this ??? he does not must make restitution restitutions for four and five ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? In justice, but not he stood In justice, he does not must make restitution restitutions for four and five He said to him Here, too, ??? The tanna used the wording But the beginning of the teaching, ??? is from that which is belonging to his father ??? and after this did he die his father He used the wording at the end of the teaching, also ??? is from that which is belonging to his father did he die his father and after this ??? He said to him five mornings the Merciful One in the Torah says And even if five ??? mornings and that one that they did not say to you ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.