It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פד,א גמרא

a child ??? an adult male The greatness ??? ??? in what way does ??? for him the Torah he said (Lev. 24) statute" one it shall be to you statute" ??? except breath ??? of him breath the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? of him So, here, light ??? of him light the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? Another teaching Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says well under well money or property You say money or property Or perhaps, except well actually and really Behold! that he was ??? how I is fulfilled lit. is stood up in this well under well and the Torah he said statute" one it shall be to you statute" ??? They said: And what does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps in a case where it is possible ??? in a case where it is not possible No. ??? for him For if it was No. you say thus ??? ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him except in a case where it is possible ??? in a case where it is not possible No. ??? for him of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: Scripture states: (Lev. 24) thus ??? in it And there is no meaning to the word ??? except money or property Except I can object with text from here: (Lev. 24) as it was He shall give" ??? Here, too, ??? he They said: of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael he read ??? it is written (Lev. 24) a man For He shall give" ??? as it was One who acts thus may he do it? to him thus ??? in it why do I have Learn from this money or property as it was He shall give" ??? why do I have ??? who seeks ??? thus ??? in it the writing of also as it was He shall give" ??? of the academy of Rabbi Chiyya a Tanna taught: Scripture states: (Deut. 19) a hand in the hand of a thing ??? immediately ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? money or property Except I can object with text from here: (Deut. 19) a foot ??? also thus he They said: of the academy of Rabbi Chiyya he read ??? it is written (Deut. 19) ??? to him as it was ??? to do his brothers? If it was You might have thought actually and really a hand in the hand of why do I have Learn from this money or property a foot ??? why do I have ??? As it is written a hand in the hand of the writing of also a foot ??? Abaye says We come to compare ??? of the academy of ??? of the academy of ??? (Ex. 21) well under well ??? under ??? and not ??? under well and if You might have thought actually and really Oftentimes ??? to it well ??? under well ??? for him ??? for him ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps ??? for him If it was ??? he accepts ??? and if he did not find he accepts No. ??? and if ??? he accepts ??? of him. ??? If it was ??? in the days of who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: regarding ??? did he die under ??? is exempt Rav ??? in the name of Rabbah he said Scripture states: (Ex. 21) ??? under ??? to give ??? in a place damage and if You might have thought actually and really so that thus it will be ??? you shall for him ??? for this also it has ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps that it is possible ??? it has ??? and there are ??? that is not ??? he does not have ??? for what practical distinction ??? for him how ??? between Rav ??? in the name of Raba he said Scripture states: (Ex. 21) "And the healer shall heal" to give ??? in a place damage and if You might have thought actually and really so that thus it will be That this he is required ??? This also he is required ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps that it is possible ??? and there are that is not ??? for what practical distinction ??? for him how ??? between Rav Ashi said: We come to compare under under ??? It is written here (Ex. 21) well under well And it is written there (Ex. 21) ??? ox under the ox Just as there money or property Even here, money or property What then does it mean when it says ??? under under ??? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? under under ??? As it is written (Ex. 21) ??? under ??? Just as there actually and really Even here, actually and really They said: ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? a person ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? a person ??? except Rav Ashi said (Deut. 22) ??? who ??? he learns it for him a person ??? It was taught: Rabbi Eliezer says well under well actually and really actually and really You might have thought Rabbi Eliezer he does not have ??? Behold! ??? Rabbah said to say that do not ??? that specific ??? He said to him Abaye except like who ??? son of ??? who it has he is equivalent. except Rav Ashi said to say that do not ??? that specific ??? except ??? This certain individual wine; ??? he came in front of Rav ??? son of Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said them ??? for him four items He said to him: Raba Hey, isn't it the case that We five We have learnt in a Mishna: He said to him for there to be wheat ??? Abaye said to him: Hey, isn't it the case that a donkey he and a donkey he does not must make restitution except damage He said to them ??? for him ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he is required ??? He said to them ??? He said to them Avuah ??? No. ??? of him. the validity And they said to him And then it happened that ??? for him ??? He said to them ??? for him ??? This certain individual ??? his hand ??? he came in front of Raba He said to them ??? And they said to him Hey, isn't it the case that Master, he for he said: all ??? yes. collect that specific in Bavel He said to them it is not necessary to teach this For if it was ??? Raba with his reasoning for he said: Raba ??? ox ??? ox ??? collect that specific in Bavel ??? a person ??? a person ??? yes. collect that specific in Bavel What is the difference ??? a person ??? a person ??? that is not God in the case of there is not in this case. ??? ox ??? also

דף פד,ב גמרא

God in the case of there is not in this case. Rather, what can we conclude? ??? ox ??? something ??? a person ??? a person ??? also ??? something ??? They said: For ??? to us ??? that is not ??? to us ??? No. ??? They said: ox ??? also No. ??? to us ??? except ??? Look, in a case ??? in the marketplace a person ??? a person ??? also ??? Look, in a case ??? my slave in the marketplace And furthermore, ??? four and five ??? They said: For ??? No. ??? a person ??? he ??? For ??? a person ??? that is not found. No. ??? Behold! ??? They said: Here, too, for it is the case that Rav ??? four hundred ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? for him Rav Chisda for Rav, ??? and He sent to him ??? in Bavel except For ??? and is in it its lack a purse but: the validity ??? is not there? its lack a purse So, too, the validity that is not found. and is in it its lack a purse No. ??? Therefore, a person ??? even though that there is in it: its lack a purse immediately that is not found. No. ??? even though ??? immediately ??? of him. its lack a purse No. ??? collect in Bavel For didn't Raba say ox ??? yes. collect that specific in Bavel ??? one Shall I say ??? a person why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ox ??? a person even a person ??? a person also yes. collect that specific in Bavel except This is obvious! ??? ox And we have learned yes. collect that specific in Bavel They said: there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ??? For didn't Raba say yes. festival in Bavel They said: ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? Hey, isn't it the case that the validity that is not found. She and the validity that is not found. this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? that is not ??? rabbis for in that place ??? Here in this case, the end of the end of the validity that is not found. She and is what you say? Do you really mean that? the validity that is not found. No. ??? except and thus he comes to say Raba ??? and a foot ??? or ??? that did not have in a place damage ??? Which Tanna taught: Rabba said: ben Azzai She as it is taught: Rabbi says ??? ben Azzai says ??? in what way ??? Rabbi reasoned ??? of it ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? He ascended ??? for there is of it ??? yes. If it was No. No. ben Azzai reasoned ??? for there is of it ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? He ascended ??? of it ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? Rabbi says ??? reasoned ??? for there is of it ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? He ascended ??? of it ??? ben Azzai says ??? reasoned ??? of it ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? He ascended ??? for there is of it ??? yes. If it was No. No. ??? they stand So, too, everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? between for there is of it ??? between ??? of it ??? and here in this other case,

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.