It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פו,א גמרא

he is liable in all of them This No. One who acts ??? How so? Is this not For example, ??? on ??? And we have learned he is liable in all of them They said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? and not One who acts in it ??? For didn't Rabbah say the plowing his father ??? on account of where it is not possible ??? without ??? "She has fallen for him ??? except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? he turned he returns And this is like the position in that case They said: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? exalted. that is not he returns ??? is what he has ??? healing of ??? Sabbath ??? among ??? He interprets it as referring to the earlier text and not ??? yes. to you ??? The greatness from this and the validity ??? for him ??? This is obvious to him. ??? side and to Raba ??? side ??? on ??? Abaye said he gives to him Sabbath that is large Sabbath a small one And Rabba said he does not he gives to him except he is equivalent. ??? day and the day it was said: ??? a hand a Hebrew male slave of his fellow Abaye said he gives to him Sabbath that is large to a slave Sabbath a small one for Rav, Rava said: The entirety ??? to a slave ??? of them ??? he eats fruits This is obvious! ??? next to himself next to his rabbi; No. ??? How so? ??? or ??? The entirety for himself ??? next to his rabbi; ??? The entirety on account of ??? In accordance with whom is the position of our mishna? No. Rabbi Meir and not R' Yehudah except R' Shimon She For it was taught in a baraita and all of them ??? those particular it is as if are these free men lit., sons of freedom ??? that are My son, Avraham Isaac and Ya'akov These are the words of R' Meir R' Yehuda says: an adult male on account of ??? on account of ??? Rabbi Shimon says: ??? those particular it is as if are these free men lit., sons of freedom ??? regarding them with whom does it agree? ??? If it was Rabbi Meir But in our mishna, it is taught: The entirety on account of ??? and Rabbi Meir all of them together ??? and if R' Yehudah But in our mishna, it is taught: ??? ??? he is liable And even R' Yehuda says: ??? he (??? ) does not have except Is this not Rabbi Shimon She Even if you say R' Yehudah For R' Yehudah said ??? he (??? ) does not have of him but: ??? for him ??? for him Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? one who sleeps he is liable sleeping ??? is exempt and not The tanna teaches: ??? is exempt from this general principle it would follow that is not ??? thus and there is no difference thus except ??? Our mishna Rabbi Shimon ??? Which Tanna taught: about this teaching For the Rabbis taught ??? ??? an adult male he gives ??? he is equivalent. ??? of a child ??? ??? son of ??? he gives ??? he is equivalent. ??? of a slave with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi Meir and not Rabbi Yehudah and not Rabbi Shimon ??? You might have thought a child a child ??? The greatness The greatness ??? If it was Rabbi Meir Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't all of them say together ??? and if Rabbi Yehudah Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't yes. say ??? and if Rabbi Shimon Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say this ??? this is exempt What is the reason? ??? Just as ??? until ??? for him As it is written (Deut. 19) ??? to him and he stood upon it until ??? to him ??? also until ??? for him As it is written (Deut. 25) ??? until ??? to him In reality lit: In the world R' Yehudah And so he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yehudah yes. ??? them but: ??? in them? And if you like, I could say even you say Rabbi Meir Who deduces The greatness The greatness ??? a child a child ??? No. The greatness The greatness actually and really and a child a child actually and really and a child son of ??? he yes. Like that which was said by Rav ??? for him ??? Here in this case, also,

דף פו,ב גמרא

??? for him ???

דף פו,ב משנה

??? ??? ??? one who sleeps he is liable sleeping ??? is exempt stillborn lit., fallen from ??? he is liable on of damages but exempt him on ??? until that it should be ???

דף פו,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? he is liable and does not ??? in the house of the bathhouse he is liable and does not ??? in the house of the bathhouse ??? Mar said: ??? he is liable ??? son of ??? he Rav Pappa said: What then does it mean when it says ??? who has arrived ??? and he came he ??? in the house of the bathhouse he is liable the house of the bathhouse son of ??? he Rav Pappa said: ??? for the sake of ??? he is required R' Abba -- son of ??? sleeping did he die What then? What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Rav said ??? thus ??? for him It is because of this: ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that ??? for him and he does not have ??? or, perhaps, It is because of this: ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Come and hear: Rabbi Meir says: A deaf person and a child there is regarding them ??? a mute he (??? ) does not have It is because of this: ??? we were where he teaches a child except If you say, It is because of this: ??? a child son of ??? he Rather, what can we conclude? It is because of this: ??? even a mute also They said: a mute yes. to you ??? that is large ??? from all a place ??? he For if it was It is because of this: ??? a child son of ??? he Like that which was said by Rav ??? for him ??? Here in this case, also, ??? for him ??? Rav Papa said, thus ??? for him It is because of this: ??? that are his he Hey, isn't it the case that ??? for him or, perhaps, It is because of this: ??? Come and hear: A deaf person and a child he has ??? a mute he (??? ) does not have If you say, This is satisfactory It is because of this: ??? we were where he teaches a child except If you say, It is because of this: ??? that are his a child son of ??? he Rather, what can we conclude? It is because of this: ??? Even if a mute also a mute yes. to you ??? that is large ??? In any case, ??? For if it was It is because of this: ??? a child son of ??? he Rav Pappa said: yes. ??? for him ??? For it was taught: R' says A deaf person he has ??? a mute he (??? ) does not have a child occasions he has occasions he (this one) does not have ??? for him ??? this one ??? for him and not ??? ??? Our mishna that is not like R' Yehudah as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: ??? he (??? ) does not have thus in the same way he was R' Yehudah exempts ??? a court בית דין What is the reason מאי טעמא with R' Yehudah ??? your eyes your eyes ??? Just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? No. Even Here in this case, ??? No. ??? as it is taught: (Num. 35) without ??? creates an exclusion ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah R' Meir says ??? ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא with R' Yehudah He could say to you (Deut. 19) and what ??? his neighbor ??? pieces of wood And even if ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: without ??? and R' Meir Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: without ??? and Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: (Deut. 19) ??? the understanding of ??? you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? And R' Yehudah This certain individual ??? the understanding of creates an exclusion ??? he who has arrived ??? a court בית דין We come to compare ??? We come to compare a wicked person a wicked person ??? a court Another teaching R' Yehuda says: ??? he (??? ) does not have

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.