It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פח,א גמרא

??? but: ??? that is not ??? No. ??? for him R' Yosi said son of ??? in front of it ??? of others he is liable ??? What is the reason? of Rabbi Yehudah Scripture states: (Deut. 25) For ??? men ??? a man ??? in which there is to him the brother he has fulfilled his obligation a slave that do not to him the brother And the rabbbis ??? he ??? Except I can object with text from here: according to R' Yehudah ??? a slave No. ??? As it is written (Deut. 19) ??? to him as it was ??? to do his brothers? Rabba said: Rav Sheshet said Scripture states: (Deut. 19) ??? evil ??? from all a place Except I can object with text from here: According to the sages, a slave ??? is valid ??? They said: ??? to you ??? according to the words of The entirety except Scripture states: (Deut. 17) and became close your brother ??? Except I can object with text from here: According to the sages, ??? a slave is valid ??? As it is written (Deut. 19) and behold until that is false ??? that is false ??? Ulla said giving witness No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? We come to compare giving witness ??? for just as a woman that it ??? in going in the congregation of is invalid ??? a slave that is not ??? in going in the congregation of is it not logical ??? Just as ??? which provides It is not ??? shall you say ??? that he was ??? a child He corrects ??? is invalid, ??? Just as ??? that is not ??? shall you say ??? that he was ??? a woman ??? and is invalid ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them which provides are not in all the commandments. ??? Even I ??? ??? that is not in all the commandments. is invalid, ??? Just as ??? which provides he does not a man shall you say ??? that he was a man except ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? to him shall you say ??? that do not ??? to him except ??? Mar, the son of Ravina he said Scripture states: (Deut. 24) No. ??? the forefathers on children" No. ??? by the mouth of the forefathers that do not to them have pity children" For if it was ??? since we say: No. ??? the forefathers on children" ??? children" let the Merciful One write in the Torah No. ??? the forefathers on their children. What then does it mean when it says children" Learn from this that is not ??? the forefathers that do not to them have pity children" Except I can object with text from here: And lack of children No. ??? on the forefathers So, here, No. ??? children" that do not to them have pity the forefathers except ??? So, here, ??? They said: thus now ??? to him have pity is more to the bottom he has have pity To exclude a slave ??? to him have pity No. is more and not to the bottom For if it was You might have thought ??? is invalid, ??? let the Merciful One write in the Torah No. ??? the forefathers on their children. ??? No. ??? children" ??? the Merciful One And lack of children No. ??? on the forefathers ??? two one No. ??? children" ??? the forefathers And the other one No. ??? by the mouth of children" that do not to them have pity the forefathers and a slave ??? for him ??? for just as ??? he ??? to him have pity but: to the bottom he has have pity is invalid, ??? a slave that do not to him have pity No. is more and not to the bottom is it not logical that it should be is invalid, ??? except ??? the Merciful One No. ??? the forefathers on children" ??? No. ??? by the mouth of the forefathers that do not to him have pity children" Learn from this a slave that do not to him have pity No. is more and not to the bottom he ??? but: ??? immediately ??? to him have pity to the bottom is valid ??? And if you would say let the Merciful One write in the Torah And lack of children No. ??? on ??? why do I have ??? the Merciful One And lack of children No. ??? on the forefathers ??? No. ??? by the mouth of children" that do not to them have pity the forefathers ??? No. ??? the forefathers on children" the writing of also And lack of children No. ??? on ??? A deaf person a mute and a child ??? of Rav Shmuel son of Abba ??? for him to R' Abba ??? for Rav, Shmuel son of Abba ??? according to ???

דף פח,ב גמרא

He went Rav Shmuel son of Abba in front of Rabbi Yirmiyah bar Abba Watch out for leading vav !! and he raised him. ??? He went R' Abba -- he said ??? in front of Rav ??? He went Rav ??? he said in front of Rav Yehudah He said to him Thus said Shmuel the his wife ??? sent forth immediately ??? in front of Rabbi Yirmiyah bar Abba He said to them I ??? For it was taught in a baraita the writing ??? for his son after ??? It is impossible to sell because of that are ??? It is impossible to sell because of that are ??? until ??? he (??? ) does not have until ??? For ??? from this it has ??? and even though ??? that is not they came to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? for he said: there is no difference did he die ??? that is not they came ??? there is no difference did he die ??? he bought the purchaser ??? did he die ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: No. he bought the purchaser Reish Lakish: he said he bought the purchaser Rabbi Yehudah he said No. he bought the purchaser He could say to you And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? No. he bought the purchaser until ??? And so ??? it has ??? that is not did he die ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? but: did he die ??? that is not they came ??? For ??? also he does not have ??? Perhaps, ??? reasoned ??? fruits ??? he is equivalent. And so ??? Is this not that are his ??? R' Shimon son of ??? says he bought the purchaser And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? yes. ??? until ??? For ??? Regardless, it has ??? there is no difference No. did he die ??? and there is no difference did he die ??? that is not they came ??? he bought the purchaser Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? fruits Is this not ??? he is equivalent. And so ??? that are his ??? and We now between R' Yirmiyah bar Abba or whether Rav Yehudah like R' Shimon son of ??? they both reason this way and he said R' Yirmiyah bar Abba If it was You might have thought ??? fruits ??? he is equivalent. For ??? why is it that it has ??? For ??? This Is this not that are his ??? except Is this not Learn from this ??? fruits Is this not ??? he is equivalent. ??? in front of Rav Yehudah He said to them Thus said Shmuel -- this refers to It is not ??? What is the reason? Rav Yosef said This is satisfactory If it was It was taught by ??? the writing ??? that it is possible ??? fruits Is this not ??? he is equivalent. except now where he teaches the writing ??? for his son It is because of this: ??? he Abaye said to him: because ??? Abba Abba No. ??? except ??? will come Here in this case, also, ??? will come Rather, what can we conclude? It is not ??? It is because of this: well-being of ??? for Rabbi Yosi said: son of ??? they ordered the his wife ??? sent forth immediately ??? Rav said Idi bar Avin Even We also ??? do we ??? so-and-so ??? his wife and gave her ketubah written contract

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.