It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ט,א גמרא

they have fulfilled the mitzvah upon it ??? before it was even the case that forcibly took possession of it It is possible ??? in it ??? of it yes. It is possible ??? in it What is the reason מאי טעמא for he said: for him ??? ??? that did not have ??? but: ??? No. and there are that they said Even if ??? also for he said: for him ??? to you Rav Huna he said or silver or ??? Rav ??? to Rav Huna. (Ex. 21) ??? the value of silver even ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? for him If it was the one who does not have This is obvious! What would you have said? say for him ??? and he carried it for him silver Come and learn from this. Rav Assi said: ??? Behold! there are. ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion Shall I say in the matter of ??? we were For Rav Huna except for two ??? and he took one ??? and one ??? came the master of obligation and he took ??? This ??? a fraction ??? This is obvious! This ??? and that one Is this not ??? that it is possible that they said ??? side ??? For if it was ??? No. ??? the land For if it was ??? No. ??? to you something ??? except for two ??? came the master of obligation and he took ??? of one from them Hey, isn't it the case that he said Rav ??? one ??? came the master of obligation and he took ??? of one from them Rav said: nullification It is a disagreement And Shmuel said ??? Rav ??? he said take one fourth in the earth and one fourth ??? Rav said: nullification It is a disagreement his reasoning is ??? are they, And Shmuel said ??? his reasoning is ??? that did not have ??? he is equivalent. Rav ??? he said take one fourth in the earth and one fourth ??? from doubt for him If it was ??? If it was ??? Therefore, take one fourth in the earth and one fourth ??? Rather, what can we conclude? Behold! there are. ??? in the matter of ??? If so, we were For Rav Huna I would say and thus Rav Assi said: R' Zayra said: Rav Huna said in a commandment until ??? What then does it mean when it says ???

דף ט,ב גמרא

Shall I say ??? his house Except I can object with text from here: If it was ??? for him three ??? except R' Zeira said ??? a commandment until ??? in a commandment he is required Rav Ashi ??? or ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. in the west They said: in the name of Rabbi Zeira until ??? of his. from here and onwards is from that which is belonging to the Holy One, Who is Blessed

דף ט,ב משנה

All items which I am obligated in guarding them it is regarded that I caused their damage. In a case where I caused in part their damage, I am obligated in making whole their damage just as one who caused all their damage. Items of movable property that do not have in them the laws of misappropriation of sacred things , items of movable property that are of Jews lit., children of the covenant , items of movable property which are assigned ??? and in any place except lit. outside for the domain which is assigned to the one causing damage or the domain of the one who was damaged and the one who caused damage

in the case where they cause damage there is an obligation on the one who caused damage to make whole restitutions for damage from the best of his lands

דף ט,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught all which I am obligated in guarding them I caused their damage. How so? ox and a pit ??? a mute and a child ??? he is liable to make whole Just as that do not thus in fire with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? and a pit it is covered ??? regarding fire ??? Why is it different here, and why is it different here, except ??? is permitted. and a pit it is revealed ??? regarding fire ??? Just as that do not thus in fire this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper for this statement that ??? said poses a contradiction: in the name ??? They did not teach such a ruling except ??? to him ??? but: ??? he is liable What is the reason מאי טעמא for it is the case that ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? and a pit it is covered ??? regarding fire ??? and that he came is what you say? Do you really mean that? Why is it different here, and What is the difference Here in this case, ox ??? a pit ??? how much ??? to it ??? to R' Yochanan for he said: even ??? to him ??? also is exempt ??? Here in this case, ??? is permitted. and a pit it is revealed What is the difference Here in this case, and What is the difference Here in this case, there i.e., in another mishna ??? is destiny? ??? Here in this case, No. ??? is destiny? ??? The Rabbis taught ??? ??? must make restitution ??? he is liable ??? of a slave ??? is forbidden to benefit from it ??? to walk and to cause damage Just as that do not thus ??? ??? Just as that do not thus ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.