It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צז,א גמרא

And who said it? Rav ??? he is equivalent. For didn't Rav say Daniel son of Rav ??? Rav said ??? of his fellow One who acts in it work is exempt And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? he is equivalent. why is it that is exempt ??? he arises Here in this case, with what are we dealing? that did not have in the hour of work This is like ??? for him Rabbi Abba ??? son of Master, he is required of him ??? he returns ??? his fellow that did not have ??? It is necessary for him ??? to him the reward for or it is not necessary ??? to him the reward for ??? for him it is not necessary for him ??? to him the reward for thus now This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna between ??? it's settled. for him between ??? (Is. 24) ??? the gate it's settled. for him except Here in this case, who it's settled. for him ??? They said: So, here, it's settled. for him that is not ??? among Rav Yosef son of Chama are they, ??? my slave ??? in them? ??? and my slave in them? work He said to him Rabbah the son of What is the reason מאי טעמא does he act? Master, thus He said to him for he said: Rav ??? No. ??? He said to him: I would say for he said: Rav ??? For example, ??? among ??? all of them my slave tanning my slave He said to him I ??? Daniel ??? for me for he said: Rav Daniel son of Rav ??? Rav said ??? of his fellow One who acts in it work is exempt Perhaps, it's settled. for him that is not ??? He said to him: What case is he dealing with? in a case that is not ??? in them? ??? Master, immediately ??? in them? ??? for he said: Rav Yosef son of ??? Rav Nachman said even though where they said he returns ??? his fellow that did not have ??? it is not necessary ??? to him the reward for ??? his fellow It is necessary for him ??? to him the reward for He said to him ??? it was said: ??? has sunk of his fellow One who acts of it work Rav said running ??? take running ??? take And Shmuel said he does not take except ??? Rav Pappa said: does not disagree this one ??? this one that is not ??? And if you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? this one who went down to lead services for him with the intent ??? Hey, isn't it the case that who went down to lead services for him with the intent ??? Rav Huna said ??? actually and really ??? the kingdom of and Rav Yehudah he said ??? the kingdom of also we were ??? except How so? How should we understand this? ??? -- this refers to ??? in the countryside ??? Rav Chisda said to him to Rav Huna. ??? that you said ??? the kingdom of Behold! fruits ??? wine ??? and so when ??? the kingdom of he is equivalent. And we have learned must make restitution ??? He said to him there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, No. ??? Raba said to him of Rav Yehudah ??? that you said ??? the kingdom of also we were ??? Behold! terumah ??? and so when ??? the kingdom of he is equivalent. And we have learned says to him Behold! ??? before you He said to him there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? it was said: ??? his fellow on ??? Rav said:

דף צז,ב גמרא

he gives to him ??? that is coming out At that very hour And Shmuel said It is possible to say to him to you ??? Rav Nachman said ??? of Shmuel is what he has ??? but: he does not have ??? No. ??? Raba for Rav, ??? yes. ??? on ??? How so? they were to him coins ??? or of kings that are the first yes. ??? this one of ??? is equivalent ??? He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? -- this refers to on -- this refers to except For Shmuel said ??? -- this refers to on -- this refers to in what way does ??? them ??? to it by way of lit., through the hands of ??? that is not ??? and if ??? Come and hear: yes. ??? on coins of here, there are. in Bavel and of ??? there are. here, of ??? there are. in Bavel ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, yes. ??? on coins of here, there are. in Bavel even though ??? to that place Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? -- this refers to on -- this refers to If so, of ??? there are. in Bavel Of what use are they? they saw ??? in them? livestock ??? to Jerusalem For it was taught: they ordered ??? in Jerusalem because of thus in the same way R' Zayra said: There is no difficulty. here, at a time i.e., in a case ??? Israel ??? on the nations of the world. here, at a time i.e., in a case ??? the nations of the world. ??? on ??? The Rabbis taught Who is ??? of Jerusalem David Solomon ??? one and Jerusalem a city ??? after and Who is ??? of Avraham our father an elderly person ??? one ??? and a virgin ??? after Raba brought this very question ??? his fellow on ??? upon it What then? He said to him: he gives to him ??? that is coming out At that very hour He said to him and even For ??? He said to him yes. He said to him Even if For ??? He said to him yes. And then it happened that ??? Rav Ashi said ??? If it was ??? for him

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.