It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צט,א גמרא

??? he gives to him he is equivalent. ??? he is equivalent. ??? yes. he is equivalent. ??? No. Is this not ??? after ??? That there are ??? And learn from this artisan he acquires ??? implements of Shmuel said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? in the hour of ??? but: ??? after ??? What then does it mean when it says he gives to him he is equivalent. ??? Let us say, Shmuel he does not have of Rav ??? He could say to you Shmuel Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? the house ??? his hand he ??? If so, he gives to him he is equivalent. ??? should bring himself except Shmuel ??? for him Come and hear: who gives ??? even from here and until ten days he does not transgresses upon it It is because of this: (Lev. 19) No. ??? it was given to him ??? the day immediately ??? upon it the sun transgresses upon it It is because of this: ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that artisan he acquires ??? implements of why is it that transgresses It is because of this: ??? Rav said ??? the son of of Rav ??? the end of the end of for what ??? immediately ??? we were ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? and for what ??? from the beginning that is not ??? That would be a support to him. To whose position? for Rav, ??? of him ??? transgresses upon it It is because of this: ??? Or perhaps, transgresses and he said to them Rav Sheishet transgresses Let us say, of Rav ??? disagrees ??? Shmuel said son of ??? Let us say, ??? Make for me ??? and finger-rings ??? to you immediately ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir But the sages say: It is not ??? until he shall have arrived money or property ??? What then does it mean when it says money or property Shall I say that specific money or property from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Meir reasoned that specific money or property No. except in what way ??? except This is obvious! What then does it mean when it says money or property money or property after ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world that is old ??? and until the end of And everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? It is not ??? Is this not ??? he acquires ??? implements of what they disagree about of Rabbi Meir reasoned artisan he acquires ??? implements of And the rabbbis reason that yes. artisan he acquires ??? implements of No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. artisan he acquires ??? implements of except Here in this case, ??? and until the end of ??? Rabbi Meir reasoned yes. ??? except in the end And the rabbbis reason that there are ??? and until the end of And if you like, I could say everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world that is old ??? and until the end of and here in this other case, in the Holy Temple ??? what they disagree about of Rabbi ??? reasoned ??? And the rabbbis reason that ??? It is not ???

דף צט,ב גמרא

Rava said: ??? that is old ??? and until the end of And everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? It is not ??? And everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world yes. artisan he acquires ??? implements of except Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? to it ??? of his. Rabbi Meir reasoned ??? And the rabbbis reason that ??? as it is taught: For a payment ??? Your nation It is not ??? For a payment ??? Your nation ??? Rabbi Natan says For a payment ??? Your nation It is not ??? and all the more so For a payment ??? Your nation And Rabbi Yehudah ??? says ??? And they said between For a payment ??? Your nation or whether For a payment ??? Your nation It is not ??? and if ??? to it ??? of his. ??? between Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna to Rabbi he gave There is this difference between them: ??? between Rabbi Natan according to R' Yehudah ??? There is this difference between them: ??? Shmuel said ??? artisan ??? he is liable to make whole one who caused damage he ??? he was it made? ??? to him ??? for me from here ??? to him from here what is the purpose according to him to say one who caused damage he ??? he If it was he said one who caused damage he then I might incorrectly say: What case is he dealing with? in a case that he came does he act? For a payment but: in a case that he came does he act? ??? No. Come and learn from this. ??? he ??? Rav Chama son of ??? who gives livestock ??? artisan is exempt ??? he is liable and if he gives the reward for between ??? between artisan he is liable He said to him: ??? he came one of the rabbis ??? for him He said to him now ??? What then does it mean when it says a "freshet" ??? ??? Let them go I Rabbi Meir ??? for me rabbis why is it that No. ??? words for I say one who caused damage he ??? he was it made? ??? to him ??? for me from here ??? to him from here one it has This reason out the logic. Rabbi Meir for he said: he had asked for him ??? Which Rabbi Meir Shall I say ??? Rabbi Meir ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? in his face, ??? and went out ??? between perfect between festival he is liable these are the words of Rabbi Meir there i.e., in another mishna ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching Rabbi Meir For it was taught in a baraita ??? to him ??? Rabbi Meir says: he gives to him he is equivalent. ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? of him but how do you reconcile that with this teaching Rabbi Meir For it was taught in a baraita ??? and not removed it "She has fallen ??? and not ??? Rabbi Meir says: he is liable ??? But the sages say: is exempt ??? a person he is liable ??? heaven ??? to us ??? he ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? artisan ??? he is liable and even he artisan ??? And who said it? Rabbi Yochanan thus For didn't Rabbah say son of son of ??? it was. in front of Rabbi Yochanan ??? He said to him: ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it proof ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, For a payment This is like for he said: Rabbi Zeira One who wishes ??? to him ??? he shall precede to him ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? and not ??? or ??? and he made for him bread ??? livestock ??? he is liable because it was ??? the reward for I would say because it was ??? the reward for This certain individual ??? in front of Rav ??? he is equivalent. ??? of him. Rav Kahana Rav ??? a person And they said to him does he act? about You Rav both What then does it mean when it says both Shall I say both ??? for him ??? like R' Yosi ??? Yehudah ??? and So, too, ??? for him ??? and who Sarai to say For This ??? For it was taught: ??? he does not say I ??? and my fellow ??? but: Just as I shall do." ??? his rabbi; by the and on this it is said (Prov. 11) walks ??? except both ??? that is not ??? doubt whether ??? it was said: ??? the moneychanger and it is found evil" One teaching artisan is exempt ??? he is liable And another teaching between artisan between ??? he is liable Rav Pappa said: For It was taught: artisan is exempt For example, ??? prohibits that is not It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? A general principle: except in what way ??? ??? this particular ??? to Rabbi Chiyya he said to it ??? he tomorrow ??? in front and he said for him ??? and They said to me: that is evil he and not ??? he departs for me He said to him: for Rav, ??? and It is written ??? judgement ??? and what is the difference here, ??? prohibits ??? It is because of this: that is not It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? Rabbi Chiyya also Is this not ??? he is required Rabbi Chiyya within the limits of justice. he ??? Rav Yosef (Ex. 18) ??? to them this

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.