It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קא,א גמרא

except for ??? river ??? Ulla said Raysh Lakish said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? and after three but: in the midst of three The entirety of the master of ??? for he said: for him If it was ??? in the midst of three who it was. Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat and let us say, for him If it was I ??? after three it was. ??? for him completely now ??? a fraction ??? except For he came ??? Raysh Lakish said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? in the midst of three but: after three The entirety ??? for he said: for him If it was I ??? after three who It was not ??? for him completely and let us say, for him If it was ??? in the midst of three It was not Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat now ??? Watch out for leading vav "And you shall eat a fraction ??? It is because of this: for he said: for him If it was I ??? it was. ??? a Tanna taught: he said ??? I take yes. ??? to him What is the reason? Rabbi Yochanan said: It is because of this: ??? the Land of Israel he said R' ??? For example, this Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rabbah It was taught there: R' Yehuda says: ??? field ??? from the stranger i.e., the non-Jew tithe he gives to him ??? What then does it mean when it says field ??? the Land of Israel But why? ??? to it field ??? field Avraham Isaac and Ya'akov but his thought is yes. ??? to a gentile in the land of Israel ??? immediately tithe and he accepts ??? he is equivalent. Just as ??? between a slave or whether No. a slave he is required ??? for him and so when ??? he is equivalent. Even he accepts also For ??? he is equivalent. tithe he gives to him He said to him Rav Kahana for Rav, ??? And there are those who say it was for Rav, ??? Watch out for leading vav So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says ??? field ??? a stranger i.e., a non-Jew tithe he gives to him why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even yes. ??? also But rather, in reality lit: in the world, there are ??? to a gentile in the land of Israel ??? immediately tithe and he accepts Is this not ??? he is equivalent. And what does it mean when it says field ??? field ??? actually and really and for him he ??? rabbis ??? upon it ??? and it comes he accepts to it but: ??? of the world No. and for him What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? rabbis R' Yochanan said: so that that it should be ??? in his hand he said Rabbi ??? For example, this Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements Rabbah it was said: ??? field his fellow ??? that did not have ??? Rav said ??? to him ??? on the lower one And Shmuel said ??? how much a person ??? to give in the field -- this refers to ??? Rav Pappa said: and does not disagree here, in the field ??? here, in the field that is not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that of Rav Is this not in a clarifying explanation it was said: except from a derivation it was said: ??? who has arrived in front of Rav He said to him ??? Assessment of for him He said to him No. ??? He said to him ??? Assessment of for him ??? on the lower one He said to him No. ??? He saw ??? to it He said to him ??? to you ??? Assessment of for him ??? on the upper one it was said: ??? of his fellow ??? that did not have ??? and he said to him ??? I take Rav ??? he said ??? to him Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said yes. ??? to him They challenged him from this teaching: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says The academy of Shammai say: ??? to him And the academy of Hillel say yes. ??? to him Let us say, Rav ??? for he said: like the academy of Shammai he for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: ??? to him these are the words of R' Shimon son of ??? R' Shimon son of ??? says The academy of Shammai say: ??? to him And the academy of Hillel say yes. ??? to him What then do we do about it? Thus said Rabbi Ya'akov R' Yochanan said:

דף קא,ב גמרא

in the house of ??? to him in the field yes. ??? to him in the field What is the reason מאי טעמא It is because of this: ??? that it is possible that they said It is because of this: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ???

דף קא,ב משנה

??? the house of to his fellow in the days of the rains It is impossible ??? from the Holiday of Sukkot and until the Paschal offering in the days of the sun thirty day ??? one ??? the sun and one ??? the rains two ten new ??? one ??? and one ??? two ten new Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? of ??? and of ??? three years

דף קא,ב גמרא

What is the difference ??? the rains and so when ??? in the days of the rains ??? the rains ??? the sun also and so when ??? the sun ??? except in the days of the rains we were The reason is that is not ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? one ??? the sun and one ??? the rains two ten new And even ??? for him ??? in the days of the rains ??? for him But why? this one No. ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? The tanna teaches: This is what he means: ??? the house of to his fellow ??? yes. It is possible ??? in the days of the rains ??? and until the Paschal offering except If so, ??? thirty day from the beginning Another teaching is like this: ??? thirty ??? two ten new Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except ??? and in the same way ??? It is necessary for him ??? thus in the same way ??? It is necessary for him ??? for he said: for him If it was ??? it was. ??? of him. ??? Rav Assi said: if enter one day in the days of the rains It is impossible ??? from the Holiday of Sukkot until the Paschal offering Hey, isn't it the case that We thirty day he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: if enter one day in the days of the rains from those thirty day It is impossible ??? from the Holiday of Sukkot and until the Paschal offering Rav Huna said and if came ??? He said to him Rav ??? This ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? This is obvious! stillborn lit., fallen for him ??? He said to him No. ??? or ??? or ??? as a gift He said to him No. ??? of him ??? If it was it was. ??? It was necessary for him ??? and if No. He said to him No. ??? There was this guy ??? of wine No. ??? cases ??? he said to it ??? to you cases ??? he said for him No. He went ??? for him cases ??? He went ??? the writing of to it ??? to it ??? The reward ??? of him of him. ??? Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua as it was One who acts thus may he do it? to him ??? on its head No. ??? a courtyward that is not ??? except even a courtyward ??? he said for him ??? it's settled. for me ??? to you No. it's settled. for me ??? by the For a lion ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says of ??? and of ??? three ??? a Tanna taught: because of ??? is greater than

דף קא,ב משנה

??? the house of to his fellow ??? he is liable ??? and with all a thing ??? artisan but: a thing that is not It once happened artisan ??? of the master of the house And there is no meaning to the word ??? except that is coming out from the oven and from ??? alone

דף קא,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: ??? the house of to his fellow ??? he is liable ??? to him ??? to him ??? to him ??? to make adjacent to him ??? he is liable to do to him ??? to do to him ??? to do to him ??? ??? They asked of him ??? on who ??? Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't Rav say ??? he returns She except a place ??? on Watch out for leading vav And who said it? them Rav Sheishet ??? a thing that do not It once happened artisan ??? and that one also Is this not It once happened artisan he ??? he

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.