It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קיא,א גמרא

and this on account of that do not ??? opposite him. How so? If it was for he said: them ??? by the his worth upon it he as it is taught: ??? ??? to do ??? his fellow he gives to him his worth must make restitution and he returns take ??? the house Just as ??? that specific it is not necessary to teach this for he said: them ??? on the master of the house Yehudah son of ??? He said to him ??? for me workers? and so go ahead and say them ??? on the master of the house ??? and Mar Zutra ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna Behold! ??? No. ??? It is because of this: ??? day ??? but: It is because of this: ??? certainly ??? all the night. and all ??? Rav said ??? all the day ??? all the night. And Shmuel said ??? all the day ??? all the night. all the day We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? all the night. all the day ??? of Rav Rav would say to you to the side The tanna teaches: ??? all the day ??? all the night. We have learnt in a Mishna: he was ??? Sabbath ??? new ??? year" ??? he would exit by day ??? all the day he would exit by night ??? all the night. all the day Rav would say to you ??? She as it is taught: ??? all the day ??? all the night. these are the words of R' Yehudah Rabbi Shimon says: ??? all the day ??? all the night. all the day from here all said ??? the reward for ??? transgresses in Hashem. desolations ??? One who acts It is because of this: (Lev. 19) ??? ??? but on account of (Lev. 19) ??? but on account of (Deut. 24) ??? Responded but on account of (Lev. 19) ??? but on account of (Deut. 24) ??? his worth but on account of (Deut. 24) No. ??? upon it the sun Behold! That there are ??? there is not in this case. ??? That there are ??? there is not in this case. ??? Rav Chisdah said in that place ??? in reality whichever he ??? and Who is ??? R' Chisda said (Prov. 3) to you and for the remainder to you and for the remainder this he ??? there are to you ??? Really? he gives to you this he ??? He disagreed with this Rav Sheishet Who is ??? upon it Torah sacrifice is equivalent ??? that he came ??? for him ??? except Rav Sheshet said ??? to you ??? there are to you ??? Really? he gives to you this he ??? He disagreed with this Abaye whichever he ??? upon it Torah sacrifice is equivalent ??? in the case of that he came ??? for him ??? except Abayye said: No. ??? Always, this he ??? to you this he ??? and for Rav, ??? what is the difference here, ??? for him and what is the difference here, ??? that is not has a problem He could say to you ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? If so, even ??? also ??? thus now This is satisfactory there it is written (Lev. 5) or ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? for him from the beginning but: regarding ??? Is it written or ??? (Lev. 5) or ??? it is written ??? Already Rava said: this he ??? and for what reason ??? the scripture to cross over upon it with two ???

דף קיא,א משנה

one the reward for a person and one the reward for livestock and one the reward for vessels there are in it It is because of this: (Deut. 24) ??? his worth and there are in it It is because of this: No. ??? until ??? when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it ??? next to the shopkeeper or next to the moneychanger he does not transgresses upon it ??? " take has sworn once its time is over he does not " take has sworn if there are witnesses ??? Behold! this " take has sworn ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? his worth And there is no meaning to the word in it It is because of this: No. ??? until mornings

דף קיא,א גמרא

with whom does it agree? ??? No. a Tanna taught: that came first ??? and not Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah Who is it as it is taught:

דף קיא,ב גמרא

(Deut. 24) ??? creates an exclusion to others ??? this ??? Righteousness ??? this he eats ??? yes. for me except the reward for a person from where do we learn ??? livestock and vessels Scripture states: ??? all ??? and all of them crossed over in all ??? from here one said the reward for a person and one the reward for livestock and one the reward for vessels there are in it It is because of this: (Deut. 24) ??? his worth and there are of them It is because of this: (Lev. 19) ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? his worth And there is no meaning to the word in it It is because of this: No. ??? livestock and vessels They do not have except It is because of this: (BOOK TITLE 24) ??? only. with whom does it agree? If it was a Tanna taught: that came first ??? it is a problem ??? If it was Rabbi Yosei it is a problem livestock and vessels Rabba said: This a Tanna taught: a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael he ??? of the academy of R' Yishmael one the reward for a person and one the reward for livestock and one the reward for vessels there are in it It is because of this: ??? his worth but on account of No. ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? his worth And there is no meaning to the word in it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא of the first tanna? ??? and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah No. ??? that is not ??? livestock and vessels It is because of this: ??? his worth also ??? It was taught by Rabbi ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 24) and not ??? upon it the sun For Responded he who that are have come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah livestock and vessels those that are not have come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? And the first tanna This For Responded he What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him This certain individual ??? to precede Responded ??? and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah This certain individual (Deut. 24) fill ??? Responded ??? And the first tanna one to precede Responded ??? and one to precede Responded ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? but: ??? I would say No. and if we had heard ??? It is because of this: that is not It is necessary for him for him but: ??? for him I would say it is not necessary to teach this and it was taught ??? Just as your soul If it was he learns it ??? even ??? also If it was No. he learns it ??? livestock and vessels ??? for him In reality lit: In the world No. he learns it ??? and It is different there in that case For scripture said: and not ??? until mornings all ??? If so, even ??? also Scripture states: ??? and not ??? If so, even livestock and vessels also this one it is written ??? Just as you see ??? livestock and vessels and to discharge the mitzvah ??? livestock and vessels it was. for him ??? which provides ??? are in the general category money or property ??? he does not are in the general category money or property ??? And the first tanna ??? This ??? What then does it mean when it says my slave for him This certain individual should bring himself to account for that which was taught ??? and not ??? some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? one ??? and one ??? nation --- ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was we had heard ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? of him. but: ??? I would say No. and if we had heard ??? It is because of this: that is not he came ??? but: ??? who has arrived ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah This No. ??? until mornings What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him ??? for him ??? for he said: Rav ??? even No. his worth except ??? to him ??? one of grapes transgresses It is because of this: ??? And the other one (Deut. 24) ??? he ??? your soul ??? a thing ??? your soul upon it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.