It's a start Dafcast Draft
ראש השנה
מועד קטן
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
עבודה זרה


Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits


This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.


This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."


I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קטז,א גמרא

??? he immediately ??? he ??? But here, in this case, but instead prayed fire Is this not ??? he ??? for him to account for that which was taught at the hour ??? prayed ??? (Ex. 12) ??? It may be eaten please, at the hour that is not ??? prayed he does not ??? It may be eaten please, This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav Yehudah ??? of books ??? of ??? he is liable two this about himself. and this about himself. he is not liable except One And another teaching ??? of books ??? of ??? It is possible No. ??? he is liable except One Scripture states: (Deut. 24) No. ??? Just as ??? that are ??? two vessels doing work One he is liable on this alone by itself and on this alone by itself Even all items that are two vessels ??? doing work One he is liable on this alone by itself and on this alone by itself There was this guy ??? he came in front ??? He said to him ??? that there is for him implements of ??? in it the needs of food for the soul and come to arise ??? He ascended Rava said: It is not necessary ??? He ascended It is possible to claim until so that ??? and Abaye he does not have this particular reason out the logic. what is the difference here, ??? in Nehardaya and he came ??? them ??? and he said The father of Shmuel It is possible to claim until so that ??? there i.e., in another mishna Is this not something ??? he Here in this case, something that He performs ??? he ??? Rav Huna son of Avin: items ??? and to rent and he said ??? there are. ??? he does not faithfully and Raba he does not have This reason out the logic. Hey, isn't it the case that Raba ??? regarding items ??? and to rent He could say to you Raba This also immediately he is equivalent. ??? and not ???

דף קטז,ב משנה

the house ??? of two ??? both they divide ??? and in dust ??? these stones ??? if he was one from them ??? a small portion of its stones ??? to him from ???

דף קטז,ב גמרא

When the baraita teaches ??? from this general principle it would follow That there are ??? upon them If it was ??? If it was ??? If so, But the beginning of the teaching, why is it that they divide ??? If it was ??? If it was ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? one ??? My son, is a voluntary act the public ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one the taking out from his fellow upon it ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? So, too, in a public domain And if you wish, I would say ??? crying This ??? No. ??? if he was one from them ??? Just as ??? If it was for he says yes. This is obvious! and if did not say yes. For what reason take except ??? Really? know Let us say, ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? says Really? know Rav Huna and Rav Yehudah They said: he is liable ??? and R' Yochanan They said: is exempt Like that which was said by ??? For example, in which there is ??? Here in this case, also, For example, in which there is ??? How so? ??? for he said: Raba a maneh worth one hundred dinars for me into your hand ??? says yes. to you ??? except ??? Really? know from the midst of that it is not possible ??? to him from ??? reasoned Raba to say on account of ??? Perhaps, immediately for he said: Really? know ??? He said to him Abaye ??? this one ??? know ??? No. know Watch out for leading vav And, too, he does not have And the other one all of them ??? except Abayye said: on account of ??? If so, What then does it mean when it says ??? for him ??? So, too, ???

דף קטז,ב משנה

the house ??? And there is no meaning to the word the master of the house ??? Behold! the master of ??? descends ??? to the bottom until ??? to him ??? R' Yosei says ??? he gives ??? ???

דף קטז,ב גמרא

??? Rav said: ??? And Shmuel said ??? Rav said: ??? but: ??? No. a person and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? to the bottom ??? is more And Shmuel said ??? yes. a person and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? to the bottom ??? is more How so? How should we understand this? If it was for he said: ??? -- this refers to Watch out for leading vav And he is consistent except for he said: for him ??? for him ??? Rabba said: it is not necessary to teach this ??? -- this refers to that I ??? to you For ??? And so Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down ??? If so, what is there to say? except Rav Ashi said ??? -- this refers to for upon regarding the house of this I ??? to you for it is the case that ??? the house of ??? and This is like for he said: ??? son of Rav ??? he said R' Isaac It once happened on the first who said to his fellow ??? for upon regarding ??? this I sell to you ??? came It once happened before Rabbi Chiyya and he said he is liable you ??? to him ??? The whole time ??? he is required R' Abba -- son of ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.