It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יב,א גמרא

a courtyward ??? It is because of this: a hand and not ??? regarding writ ??? he to it yes. ??? to a person except in his face, regarding gifts ??? he to him ??? to a person that did not have in his face, Back to the main body of the text: he saw those particular they were running after a lost object and etc. he said Rabbi ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: This is only in the case ??? he is required Rabbi ??? as a gift how ??? of him R' Abba -- son of ??? despite the fact ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? he is required Raba In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? this and went out ??? after What then? ??? that do not ??? he is equivalent. or did not say to him Rav ??? to Raba And there are those who say it was Rav ??? son of gifts to Raba And there are those who say it was Ravina to Raba Is this not we were Our mishna he saw those particular they were running after a lost object and he said Rabbi ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: This is only in the case ??? he is required Rabbi ??? as a gift how ??? of him Rabbi Abba bar Kahana as a gift even though ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? He said to him: ??? that I ??? he is equivalent.

דף יב,א משנה

Items that were found by his son or his daughter who were minors Items that were found by his male slave or his female slave who were Canaanites Items that were found by his wife Behold! these are his Items that were found by his son or his daughter who were adults Items that were found by his male slave or his female slave who were Jewish lit., Hebrew Items that were found by his wife whom he had divorced despite the fact that he did not give yet the amount of her ketuba Behold! these are theirs

דף יב,א גמרא

Shmuel said On account of what did they say Items that were found a child ??? next to his father and does not based on this lit: from after, in his hand This comes to imply ??? Shmuel a child he does not have ??? for his own sake according to Torah law, For it was taught: ??? ??? his son after him: ??? No. ??? his son after him: Rabbi Yosei says: whether like this or whether like that ??? his son and the wife lit. his wife after him: and Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi If you say, This is satisfactory a child it has ??? for his own sake For ??? for his own sake ??? and Avuah of him ??? except If you say, a child he does not have ??? for his own sake For ??? Avuah ??? he why is it that his wife his son ??? after him: Shmuel The reason is ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him No. he reasons for himself. reasoned Rabbi Yosei a child it has ??? according to Torah law, For it was taught in a mishna: Items that were found A deaf person a mute and a child there are of them It is because of this: ??? because of ??? peace Rabbi Yosei says: ??? complete. and Rav Chisdah said ??? complete. ??? practical distinction ??? except Abayye said: ??? that they went of it ??? reason that the son of ??? for him He said to him Rav ??? son of gifts ??? And so is permitted. to a person ??? lion, in the midst of ??? so that ??? except Rabba said:

דף יב,ב גמרא

they make that is not he merits ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? it's settled. them so that thus it will be and so when ??? after them and disagrees For R' Chiyya son of Abba for he said: Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba Rabbi Yochanan said: No. The greatness The greatness actually and really and not a child a child actually and really except The greatness immediately adjacent lit: leaning on table his father ??? a child a child and does not immediately adjacent lit: leaning on table his father ??? Items that were found his male slave or his female slave who were Jewish lit., Hebrew Behold! he of ??? why is it that No. ??? except ??? and it was taught: Items that were found ??? for himself Regarding what matters are we speaking? at a time i.e., in a case who said to him ??? with me" the day ??? with me" the day but: He said to him: One who acts with me" work the day ??? the house he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba Rabbi Yochanan said: Here in this case, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that do not his rabbi; ??? Rava said: ??? a lost object with ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) Rav Papa said, For example, ??? found items and How so? ??? This a maidservant How so? If it was ??? two ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? and if that is not Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it two ??? If it was ??? to a father ??? and if ??? to a father Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough with the death of ??? for he said: ??? A Hebrew female slave he bought herself with the death of ??? for the domain ??? by a "kal vachomer" Is this not ??? Let him say ??? also ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? to a father And what does it mean when it says Behold! there are. that are theirs To exclude ??? Items that were found ??? This is obvious! Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? It is not ??? for he said: Rabbi Zeira Shmuel said in all places where they said the sages ??? It is not ??? he is liable ??? The reason is What then does it mean when it says say rabbis Items that were found a woman for her husband. so that thus it will be that is not ??? to it ??? Here in this case, ??? to it ???

דף יב,ב משנה

he found contracts of obligation IOUs if there are in them liens on items of movable property He does not return them for the court we accept repayment from them But if the IOUs They do not have liens on items of movable property he returns them for the court does not accept repayment from them these are the words of Rabbi Meir But the sages say: whether like this or whether like that He does not return because of the fact that the court we accept repayment from them

דף יב,ב גמרא

with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? give thanks For there are of them liens on items of movable property why is it that He does not return this one give thanks and if ??? he is liable give thanks For They do not have liens on items of movable property why is it that he returns ??? that is not regarding ??? regarding In reality lit: In the world ??? give thanks and here in this other case, we were The reason is ??? lest the writing of ??? and not ??? until ??? and comes ??? that did not have ??? If so, all contracts of ??? them thus all contracts of No. ??? Behold! ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For it was taught in a baraita ??? a legal document to the borrower even though that do not ??? with it ??? in what way does ??? lest the writing of ??? and not ??? until ??? and comes ??? that did not have ??? Rav Assi said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.