It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

??? for it is the case that ??? If so, Our mishna where he teaches if there are of them liens on items of movable property He does not return ??? give thanks but on account of lest the writing of ??? and not ??? until ??? and comes ??? that did not have ??? why is it that He does not return ??? If it was with a contract ??? this one ??? for him ??? If it was with a contract that is not ??? there is not in this case. ??? for it is the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? For there is not in this case. ??? No. ??? He said to him Rav ??? even though ??? For there is not in this case. ??? No. ??? Our mishna immediately ??? for him and there is a fear of them. Perhaps ??? and It is written Abaye said ??? to him and even contracts of ??? It is because of this: ??? for him immediately that you said ??? For ??? to the lender ??? No. ??? there is not in this case. ??? and It is written but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For it was taught in a baraita he found writs of divorce of women and writs of emancipation of slaves wills ??? gifts ??? Behold! this He does not return lest the Writings they were but he had second thoughts upon them that did not have ??? And so double-check upon them What then does it mean when it says you shall Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? to him What case is he dealing with? in a case that he came ??? but: in a case where they have not qualified ??? we do not say except Our mishna where he teaches he found contracts of obligation if there are at them." liens on items of movable property He does not return ??? give thanks but on account of lest the writing of ??? and not ??? until ??? This is satisfactory for Rav, ??? for he said: ??? to it ??? and since we say: except ??? for he said: ??? to him What is there to say? He could say to you Abaye ??? we were The reason is ??? for he said: No. there is a fear of them. ??? What is there to say? This is satistfactory If it was derive it ??? for he said: ??? Our mishna ??? except If it was reasoned ??? for he said: ??? to him What is there to say? Shmuel ??? he is liable give thanks If so, For They do not have liens on items of movable property why is it that he returns ??? that is not regarding from ??? regarding Shmuel with his reasoning for Shmuel said: says he was Rabbi Meir a legal document obligation in which is not liens on items of movable property yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? And so based on this lit: from after, that is not ??? why is it that he returns he said Rabbi Natan son of ??? by the mouth of ??? of ??? them to the borrower ??? by the mouth of ??? of ??? he

דף יג,ב גמרא

for he said: No. they were items Always, Rabbi Eliezer said It is a disagreement ??? he is liable give thanks of Rabbi ??? reasoned a legal document in which is not liens on items of movable property he does not ??? No. ??? and not ??? And the rabbbis reason that ??? he that is not regarding ??? regarding but: ??? give thanks the words of all are he returns and not there is a fear of them. ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? give thanks of Rabbi ??? reasoned a legal document in which is not liens on items of movable property ??? he that is not regarding but: ??? regarding And the rabbbis reason that ??? also regarding but: ??? he is liable give thanks the words of all are He does not return ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Yochanan ??? of Rabbi ??? of Shmuel ??? he found contracts of obligation and there are at them." liens on items of movable property even though ??? "We thank..." He does not return No. to this and not to this They do not have liens on items of movable property at a time i.e., in a case who lent give thanks he returns to the lender yes. who borrowed give thanks He does not return No. to this and not to this these are the words of Rabbi Meir that he was Rabbi Meir says: contracts of in which there is at them." liens on items of movable property ??? and those that do not at them." liens on items of movable property ??? free men lit., sons of freedom But the sages say: One of these and one of these ??? of Rabbi ??? for he said: to Rabbi Meir a legal document in which is not liens on items of movable property he does not ??? and not ??? free men lit., sons of freedom and he said between to R' ??? between According to the sages, No. there is a fear of them. ??? The tanna teaches: a legal document in which is not liens on items of movable property ??? he that is not regarding this one ??? regarding And we have learned between According to Rabbi Meir, between According to the sages, there is a fear of them. ??? where he teaches despite the fact ??? "We thank..." He does not return No. to this and not to this Perhaps, there is a fear of them. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Behold! both he

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.