It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

??? came ??? the principal amount ??? came ??? fruits ??? free men lit., sons of freedom Raba did not say ??? son of Rav Huna Behold! She ??? and Rabbah the son of Rav Huna did not say ??? Behold! She ??? Rav Ashi said: to the side The tanna teaches: For example, ??? field from his fellow ??? fruits he ate the fruits? ??? the field came the purchaser ??? the principal amount ??? came ??? fruits ??? free men lit., sons of freedom between to Raba between ??? son of Rav Huna ??? on "Here is he ??? on "Here is he does not ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? In justice, and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? If so, fruits also ??? In justice, on ??? and not he stood In justice, on the fruits? And what does it mean when it says ??? For ??? reasoned Shmuel the purchaser ??? he does not have ??? Hey, isn't it the case that He said to him Shmuel for Rav, ??? son of ??? and It is written beauty ??? in what way If it was ??? obligation who it has ??? For didn't Shmuel say the master of obligation ??? ??? praise yes. but: fruits No. except Is this not ??? Rav Yosef said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, in which there is to him ??? He said to him Abaye And so is permitted. ??? in a place in which there is to him ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ??? that it is possible that they said Rav Yosef said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? He said to him Abaye And so is permitted. ??? in a place ??? He said to him there i.e., in another mishna ??? and here in this other case, ??? Back to the main body of the text: Shmuel said the master of obligation ??? ??? Rabba said: Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? written to him sell ??? I ??? ??? and a deer ??? and he has accepted ??? He said to him Rav Chiyya son of Avin: to Raba Except I can object with text from here: gifts that is not it is written for him thus So, here, that is not ??? He said to him yes. And so proper The strength gifts ??? He said to him yes. proper proper Rav Nachman said this one ??? That would be a support to him. To whose position? for Master Shmuel ??? to it of matters ??? as it is taught: ??? field to his fellow Consider this case: She ??? ??? and praise ??? free men lit., sons of freedom ??? to it of matters ??? Another teaching ??? field to his fellow ??? came the master of obligation ??? if ??? -- more on ??? take ??? obligation and if ??? on ??? he (except) does not have ??? the measure praise ??? obligation Hey, isn't it the case that Shmuel in what way ??? to it If it was ??? it is a problem But the beginning of the teaching, for Shmuel said: the purchaser ??? he does not have ??? If it was ??? obligation it is a problem But the beginning of the teaching, and at the end of the teaching, for Shmuel said: the master of obligation ??? ??? If you wish, I would say ??? For example, in which there is to him ??? So, too, ??? If you wish, I would say ??? obligation And there is no difficulty. here, ???

דף טו,ב גמרא

??? here, ??? that is not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? in all day ??? Shmuel Even if ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? of him. ??? the land ??? this one that is not ??? of him. except ??? the land ??? for him ??? for him This is satistfactory ??? If it was it has ??? he did not find ??? for him ??? obligation then the ruling is acceptable. except for one for he said: For it has ??? for him ??? obligation Let him say for him Watch out for leading vav !! And even it was. for me ??? it was. ??? the land now ??? for me ??? Give for me ??? on earth. the measure ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? for he said: for him No. ??? to you ??? except ??? of it that is not are his ??? Rav said coins he has praise he (And Shmuel said) does not have Even if coins he (about what do they disagree?) does not have Rav reasoned a person know ??? he (??? ) does not have and gave ??? And let him say for him ??? reasoned No. he accepts And for Shmuel reasoned a person know ??? he (??? ) does not have and gave ??? gifts And let him say for him ??? gifts ??? for him the validity Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of him. one ??? ??? Rav said: coins ??? And Shmuel said coins gifts Rav said: coins ??? a person know that do not ??? and gave ??? And let him say to it ??? reasoned No. ??? of him And Shmuel said coins gifts a person know that do not ??? and gave ??? gifts And let him say to it ??? gifts ??? to it the validity Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it only stated In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav that is not my slave ??? presentations ??? but: regarding ??? I would say give thanks for him ??? And if it was said ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Shmuel but: In this case, I would say give thanks for him for Rav, Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements between for Rav, for he said: ??? between ??? for he said: gifts This to the ground in what way ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down fruits in what way does ??? reasoned I ??? to the ground ??? so that thus it will be that he was does he act? ??? will come Master ??? for Rav, for he said: ??? for he said: gifts gifts Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion he has coins and he has praise And even though that did not have ??? to him ??? of it that is not are his ??? coins he has praise he (liens on) does not have in error" ??? he between ??? between ??? a purchase ??? Shmuel brought this very question ??? ??? had a vision that are the first What then? He said to him: Just as ??? to him ??? for two all ??? What is the reason? Mar Zutra he said it's settled. for him that is not ??? Rav Ashi said: it's settled. for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? the purchaser The one who said it's settled. for him that is not ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.