It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

??? in a private domain take and are proclaimed that is not ??? between in a public domain or whether in a personal domain take and are proclaimed immediately ??? No. ??? and Raba ??? with his reasoning in a place small sheaves in the public domain Behold! these are his ??? in a personal domain he is liable to proclaim that is not ??? between in the public domain or whether in a personal domain take and are proclaimed immediately ??? No. ??? Come and hear: loaves of had been sealed Behold! these are his this one of the master of the house he is liable to proclaim of the master of the house What is the reason? immediately for there is in them? a sign of ??? he and there is no difference is a voluntary act the public and there is no difference is a voluntary act Watch out for leading vav or the individual take and are proclaimed Perhaps, a sign of ??? you shall a sign of ??? of Rabbah He could say to you Rabbah there i.e., in another mishna we were The reason is It is because of this: ??? on ??? And this is present here. ??? livestock and dogs ??? that is not ??? livestock and dogs Let us say, ??? Rabbi Yehudah says any thing in which there is in it who changes he is liable to proclaim How so? he found ??? and in its midst pottery a loaf and in its midst coins from this general principle it would follow ??? that came first reasoned Behold! these are his ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world a sign of that comes ??? you shall a sign of ??? on ??? Is this not ??? one master reasons that shall not be a sign of and one master reasons that you shall a sign of Rav said ??? in the name of Raba Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that that he came reasoned a Tanna taught: that came first a sign of ??? shall not be a sign of ??? on ??? loaves of the master of the house in the public domain why is it that are proclaimed except Rav said ??? in the name of Raba everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world reason that a sign of ??? you shall a sign of ??? on ??? and here in this other case, ??? that comes ??? that came first reasoned a sign of that comes ??? shall not be a sign of and Rabbi Yehudah reasoned you shall a sign of and Rava said to him: ??? a sign of ??? shall not be a sign of And there is no meaning to the word ??? on ??? and here in this other case, ??? that comes ??? what they disagree about Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned shall not be a sign of and Rabbi Yehudah reasoned you shall a sign of that it is possible that they said ??? a sign of that comes ??? you shall a sign of and the sign ??? shall not be a sign of Is this not ??? on ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that yes. ??? Rav said ??? in the name of Raba Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that reasoned Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna a sign of ??? shall not be a sign of ??? on ??? loaves of the master of the house in the public domain why is it that are proclaimed except Rav said ??? in the name of Raba everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world reason that a sign of ??? you shall a sign of ??? on ??? and here in this other case, ??? that comes ??? that came first reasoned a sign of that comes ??? shall not be a sign of and Rabbi Yehudah reasoned you shall a sign of and Rava said to him: everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world a sign of ??? shall not be a sign of And there is no meaning to the word ??? on ??? and here in this other case, ??? that comes ??? a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned a sign of that comes ??? shall not be a sign of and Rabbi Yehudah reasoned you shall a sign of Rav said ??? in the name of Raba ??? immediately for he said: ??? to it ??? a purse ??? for him ??? And Rav says ??? in the name of Raba Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion small sheaves in a public domain Behold! these are his in a private domain If it was a way ??? Behold! these are his If it was a way ??? take and are proclaimed and both this and this In the matter in which is not a sign of but: In the matter in which there is in it a sign of there is no difference in the public domain and there is no difference in a private domain between a way ??? or whether a way ??? he is liable to proclaim

דף כג,ב גמרא

and strings of ??? why is it that ??? a sign of ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world thus ??? from where do we learn a sign of ??? They asked of him ??? you shall a sign of or shall not be a sign of He said to them Rav Sheishet ??? he found implements of silver and implements of copper ??? of ??? and all implements of ??? Behold! this He does not return until that one give ??? or until that he concentrate ??? you shall a sign of ??? And from where do we learn also you shall ??? and cuts of meat ??? why is it that ??? a sign of ??? a sign of or ??? or ??? who was not taught? he found cuts fish and fish ??? he is liable to proclaim ??? of wine and of oil and of ??? and of ??? and of ??? Behold! these are his Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? the signs that we given? ??? This is like of Rabbah son of Rav Huna ??? for him ??? also where he teaches is equivalent ??? Learn from this Mar said: ??? of wine and of oil and of ??? and of ??? and of ??? Behold! these are his Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: so that wine and jars of oil he is liable to proclaim R' Zayra said: Rav said Our mishna ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? If it was ??? a lost item ??? She Rav said ??? Abaye said even you say This and this ??? And there is no difficulty. here, before ??? here, after ??? This is like of Rav Ya'akov son of Abba ??? of wine after ??? he came in front ??? He said to him ??? Rav Bibi brought this very question ??? a place you shall a sign of or shall not be a sign of He said to him: ??? he found ??? of wine and of oil and of ??? and of ??? and of ??? Behold! these are his And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? you shall a sign of ??? a place Rav said ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? Rav said ??? What is the reason? And they said rabbis ??? shall not be a sign of ??? for him so that thus it will be ??? also ??? that it is possible that they said Rav said ??? What is the reason? And they said rabbis a place shall not be a sign of ??? for him so that thus it will be ??? This a place ??? also ??? This a place There was this guy he found ??? among ??? he came in front of Rav He said to him ??? He saw that he was ??? He said to him ??? for him ??? of him Let us say, ??? reasoned Rav a place shall not be a sign of Thus said Rabbi Abba It is because of this: ??? of it that he saw ??? of him. ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? says ??? What then does it mean when it says trade or merchandise R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said new vessels that did not have ??? the well How so? If it was ??? in them? a sign of For No. ??? the well What then does it mean when it says you shall If it was ??? in them? a sign of For ??? the well What then does it mean when it says you shall In reality lit: In the world ??? in them? a sign of practical distinction ??? from the rabbis ??? the well ??? for him ??? for him For No. ??? the well No. ??? for him ??? and not ??? for him for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? three words ??? rabbis ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.