It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

??? from ??? but: ??? the house he is liable to turn and thus It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? They did not teach this לא שנו except ??? from ??? but: ??? the house he is liable to turn He said to him Rav ??? And so the master of the house about himself. ??? He said to him ??? He said to him No. ??? For example, ??? by way of lit., through the hands of his male slave or his female slave who were Canaanites

דף כז,א משנה

Even a garment was included in the general category of all these and for what reason was it taken out from the general category and explained separately? To make an analogy from it to say to you Just as a garment is unique that there is in it signs and there are to it specific properties So, too any thing in which there is in it signs and there are to it specific properties he is liable to proclaim

דף כז,א גמרא

What then does it mean when it says are in the general category all these Rabba said: are in the general category (Deut. 22) all ??? your brother Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One ox a donkey ??? and a garment It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: a garment then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? and signs ??? but: a donkey ??? and signs ??? I would say No. ??? for him Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: a donkey that even a donkey ??? ox ??? the Merciful One Why do I need ox that even ??? and let the Merciful One write in the Torah ox that even ??? and how much more so ??? except Rabba said: a donkey ??? to Rabbi Yehudah ??? according to the words of The entirety it is a problem and so go ahead and say ??? he who has arrived ??? them and perhaps, ??? he who has arrived ??? to us signs a law established by the Torah or is a law established by the Rabbis Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? that even with signs ??? and signs a law established by the Torah They said: When the baraita teaches them a Tanna taught: ??? regarding a garment where he teaches Just as a garment is isolated ??? in which there is signs and there are to it specific properties he is liable to proclaim Even any thing in which there is in it signs and he has specific properties he is liable to proclaim Learn from this ??? Is this not ??? he ??? The rabbis taught: (Deut. 22) who ??? creates an exclusion ??? where there is not in it the value of ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? creates an exclusion ??? where there is not in it the value of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Abayye said: ??? There is this difference between them: Master, ??? for him ??? Master, ??? for him ??? and for one ??? for him ??? This ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him This certain individual should bring himself ??? for he said: Rabinai ??? and for one ??? for him ??? This who ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him he had asked for him ??? Yochanan for he said: Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai ??? river that it it is permitted. as it is said thus shall you do for all ??? your brother who ??? from him ??? who ??? from him ??? next to every person Came forth -- this refers to ??? from him It is not ??? next to every person And the other one this one ??? for him ??? for him ??? And the other one this one of Rabbi Yochanan ??? for him ??? for him from him And the other one from him No. ??? for him Rava said: ??? There is this difference between them: ??? that it is possible ??? there is not in this case. ??? who ??? this one in the case of ??? there is not in this case. except ??? There is this difference between them: The one who said ??? that it is possible and the one who said who ??? there is not in this case. and for one for he said: ??? this one in the case of who ??? there is not in this case. except ??? There is this difference between them: The one who said who ??? that it is possible and the one who said ??? in the case of for there is of it the measure a lost object ??? a lost item and until ??? They posed this difficulty: signs a law established by the Torah or is a law established by the Rabbis What then does it mean when it says practical distinction

דף כז,ב גמרא

??? a writ of a woman ??? If you say, ??? And if you say is a law established by the Rabbis For ??? rabbis ??? but: ??? No. ??? rabbis ??? Come and hear: Even a garment it was are in the general category all these and for what reason was it taken out To make an analogy from it and to say to you Just as a garment is isolated ??? in which there is to it signs and there are to it specific properties he is liable to proclaim Even any thing in which there is to him signs and he has specific properties he is liable to proclaim a Tanna taught: specific properties ??? for him signs so that ??? Come and hear: a donkey ??? I would say ??? Come and hear: (Deut. 22) and it was the case that Your nation until your brother seeks it And so ??? on ??? to him before ??? except ??? if a swindler he Or perhaps, a swindler Is this not with signs No. ??? Come and hear: yes. acting as witnesses except on ??? with ??? despite the fact in which there is signs ??? Learn from this signs Is this not a law established by the Torah They said: ??? its implements ??? If it was there is a fear of them. ??? a donkey ??? in what way does ??? They said: ??? No. ??? It is because of this: ??? for him ??? If you wish, I would say its implements ??? Watch out for leading vav So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: they found ??? in a purse or ??? or ??? between its implements even to invite is greater than is valid And if it enters your mind to argue that there is a fear of them. ??? For they found ??? in a purse why is it that is valid ??? They said: a purse ??? No. ??? a purse ??? It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: ??? Let us say, ??? yes. acting as witnesses on ??? son of ??? says acting as witnesses on ??? Is this not In this case, what they disagree about of the first tanna? reasoned signs is a law established by the Rabbis ??? son of ??? reasoned signs a law established by the Torah Rabba said: ??? signs a law established by the Torah and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? It is not ??? If you wish, I would say ??? It is not ??? and here in this other case, with signs ??? after death what they disagree about one master reasons that signs ??? after death and one master reasons that signs yes. ??? after death Watch out for leading vav And if you wish, I could say ??? It is not ??? after death and signs is a law established by the Rabbis and here in this other case, ??? a sign of ??? he what they disagree about ??? a sign of ??? he ??? Is this not a sign of ??? he Rabba said: ??? signs Is this not a law established by the Torah in what way does ??? with signs ??? for him ??? a lost item ??? with signs so that thus it will be and so when it was lost misplaced for him for him also ??? for him with signs He said to him: Rav ??? to Raba And so a person makes that is good for himself ??? that is not are his except it's settled. for him ??? a lost item ??? signs ??? know ??? he does not have ??? he said the whole world No. ??? signs ??? and I ??? signs ??? to it but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For it was taught in a baraita Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says one who borrowed from three he returns to the borrower three ??? from the one he returns to the lender it's settled. for him to the borrower ??? for him to the lender He said to him: there i.e., in another mishna reason out the logic. he one who borrowed from three he returns to the borrower ??? regarding ??? No. ??? Learn from this ??? three ??? he shall return to the lender ??? regarding ??? No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.