It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ל,א גמרא

??? Watch out for leading vav he shakes it ??? but not for his honor ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: Watch out for leading vav he shakes it ??? yes. this one ??? No. I would say at the end of the teaching, but not for his honor for his honor he that is not this one ??? it is of acceptable worth. except ??? there is not in this case. ??? Come and hear: No. ??? Not on regarding a bed and not on regarding ??? but: ??? atop a bed and atop ??? for its needs ??? to him ??? No. ??? Not on regarding a bed and not on regarding ??? between ??? between ??? It is different there in that case ??? to it If it was It is because of this: ??? If it was It is because of this: they steal Come and hear: ??? on account of ??? is invalid Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? he And we have learned is invalid It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Deut. 21) who No. ??? of it In any case, If so, even But the beginning of the teaching, also this one No. is comparable except about this teaching For it was taught in a baraita which provides upon it "uf" ??? He ascended upon it male, is invalid What is the reason? Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? for he said: Rav ??? If it was it is written ??? and we recite ??? then I might incorrectly say: even ipso facto and if it is written a slave and we recite a slave then I might incorrectly say: until ??? of it ??? now As it is written a slave and we recite ??? in the case of ??? is equivalent ??? Just as a slave ??? for him Even ??? implements of silver and implements of copper he makes use of them ??? The Rabbis taught The one who finds implements of wood he makes use of them on account of that did not have ??? implements of copper he makes use of them ??? but not by way of lit., through the hands of the fire lit., the light because of ??? implements of silver he makes use of them ??? but not ??? because of ??? he makes use of them he blesses but not ??? because of ??? implements of gold and implements of glass he shall not touch them until Elijah comes like the way where they said ??? thus in the same way And they said ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav said ??? son of Chama Rav Sheshet said ??? that they went ??? he found a sack or a large basket ??? whose way is not to be picked up Behold! this No. ??? words ??? (Deut. 22) ??? occasions that you ??? occasions ??? you ??? How so? he was a priest but it in the house of ??? or that he was an elderly person It is not on account of ??? or ??? work are his is greater than is from that which is belonging to his fellow ??? it is said ??? from them for what It is necessary to teach this he read Shall I say ??? but it in the house of ??? This is obvious! This One who acts and that one No. shall you do One who acts and not will come One who acts ??? No. shall you do One who acts And naught else ??? except ??? is greater than is from that which is belonging to his fellow ??? Yehudah Rav said ??? for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said (Deut. 15) ??? For

דף ל,ב גמרא

No. it shall be about You ??? before ??? every person except ??? and does not on account of ??? Rabbah said ??? he is liable of it Abaye it was. ??? in front of Rabbah he saw ??? in them? He said to him ??? in them? to arise ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? to turn in the field And there is no meaning to the word ??? to turn in the city What then? who say ??? in the case of And because of the fact ??? to turn in the city No. ??? or, perhaps, in the field Regardless, he ??? for him And because of the fact ??? for him in the field ??? for him in the city The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Rabba said: all ??? he turns ??? his fellow also he turns and all ??? his fellow also ??? Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi he was going ??? of him. There was this guy it was. ??? He said to him ??? for me He said to him: how much they agree He said to him a fraction ??? he will give for him a fraction ??? he returns took possession in them? he returns he will give for him a fraction ??? He saw that he was he is required ??? in them? He said to him ??? the World: ??? to you No. ??? and who you shall ??? For This ??? For it was taught in a mishna: The academy of Shammai say ??? And the academy of Hillel say he does not ??? until that it should be ??? except Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi ??? the World: ??? in reality he ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi an elderly person and does not on account of ??? it was. R' Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi within the limits of justice. he ??? For Rav learned: Joseph (Ex. 18) ??? to them this the house of ??? ??? -- this refers to ??? lovingkindnesses ??? shall go this ??? of it -- this refers to burial and ??? this justice. who ??? -- this refers to within the limits of ??? Mar said: ??? shall go this ??? we were ??? lovingkindnesses No. ??? except ??? As Mar said: son of ??? take one ??? And even if thus he had asked for him ??? of it -- this refers to burial we were ??? lovingkindnesses No. ??? except ??? and does not on account of ??? who ??? -- this refers to within the limits of justice. for he said: R' Yochanan No. ??? Jerusalem except on ??? of it judgement Torah except ??? except I would say ??? on judgement Torah and not his male slave within the limits of justice.

דף ל,ב משנה

What is this, that is a lost item he found a donkey or a cow grazing on the way This is not a lost item a donkey and its implements are overturned a cow running among the vineyards Behold! This is a lost item He returned it and it ran off He returned it and it ran off Even if this happened on four and five occasions he is obligated to return it As it is said (Deut. 22) you shall return, return them if it was a case of wasted work time he does not say to him give to me a sela coin But rather, he gives to him his worth as a worker if there is in that place a court he petitions before the court בית דין for his lost wages if there is not there a court בית דין before whom does he petition? In such a case, his own needs come before the needs of the owner of the lost object

דף ל,ב גמרא

because all Behold! ??? Is this not a lost item are they, Rav Yehudah said thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Which is it A general principle: a lost item that he was he is liable of it he found a donkey and a cow grazing on the way This is not a lost item and not ??? of it a donkey and its implements ??? a cow and running between the vineyards Behold! This is a lost item ??? of it And really Rav Yehudah said Rav said until three days How so? If it was ??? Even if one ??? also If it was ??? Even if ??? also No. it is not necessary to teach this ??? Look, to it ??? three ??? say ??? to it ??? certainly a lost item She Another teaching is like this: he found ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.