It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לב,א גמרא

two ??? three and So, too, two ??? in the presence of among three He said to him ??? to you this one He said to him For it was taught in a baraita if there are in that place a court בית דין gifts ??? there is not there a court בית דין before whom does he petition? are his before He said to him who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna ??? for this in the case of a court בית דין But here, in this case, that are his ??? the validity in reality he it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? for him Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: For it was taught in a baraita a widow ??? that did not have before a court בית דין Abaye said to him: Is this not who was it said; He ascended Rav Yosef said son of ??? he said ??? a widow It is not it requires a court בית דין of ??? but: it requires a court of ???

דף לב,א משנה

??? He is not liable of it in the public domain he is liable of it and if it was in the house of ??? No. ??? to it if He said to him: his father ??? or who said to him to ??? No. Watch out for leading vav "And to him heard section ??? section ??? even four and five occasions he is liable as it is said (Ex. 23) ??? he has walked and he sat to him and he said Because upon you a commandment if ??? is exempt as it is said with it if he was an elderly person or an ill person he is liable a commandment from the Torah ??? but not to claim Rabbi Shimon says: Even to claim Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean says if he was upon it ??? on ??? yes. ??? to him as it is said under ??? that it is possible to stand therein.

דף לב,א גמרא

Rabba said: ??? where they said It is not ??? It is not ??? It is not ??? When the baraita teaches he is not liable of it It is not ??? he is not liable of it For if it was You might have thought ??? now ??? to it ??? to it ??? to it ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? except Learn from this It is not ??? "Hear!" ??? he does not ??? R' Yitzchak said This is only in the case ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? the public and even in the midst of ??? also he is liable there is someone who teaches this as referring ??? in the public domain he is liable of it Rabbi Yitzchak said This is only in the case ??? except ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? even is standing except ??? also he is not liable ??? in the house of ??? No. ??? The Rabbis taught from where do we learn ??? He said to him: his father ??? or who said to him to ??? that did not have Watch out for leading vav "And to him heard as it is said (Lev. 19) a man of its mother his father ??? and ??? I am Hashem ??? they are obligated ??? The reason is ??? the Merciful One ??? this one Is this not thus then I might incorrectly say: ??? for him But why? This One who acts and that one No. shall you do One who acts and not will come One who acts ??? No. shall you do One who acts It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say Because ??? and if for his honor of a place as it is said here, (Ex. 20) ??? your father and ??? and it is said there (Prov. 3) ??? Hashem ??? Therefore, ??? for him Come and learn from this. that is not ??? a commandment from the Torah ??? but not ??? What then does it mean when it says but not to claim Shall I say but not to claim A general principle: what is the difference here, ??? As it is written ??? with it ??? also it is written (Deut. 22) ??? with it except a commandment from the Torah ??? and not to claim ??? except For a payment Rabbi Shimon says: Even to claim ??? about this teaching ??? For a payment Rabbi Shimon says: -- this refers to -- this refers to ??? What is the reasoning is a law established by the Rabbis For if it was ??? like Rabbi Shimon let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? and it does not require ??? and I I thought to say for just as ??? of it ??? life, there is not in this case. its lack a purse he is liable ??? for there is of it ??? life, and its lack a purse is it not all the more so? except for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? the Merciful One to say to you ??? For a payment and Rabbi Shimon What is the reason? It is because of this: that is not ??? And the rabbbis why is it that No. ??? Here in this case, it is written ??? under ??? there it is written ??? on the way ??? we do not have ??? and Rabbi Shimon ??? on the way we do not have ??? Rabba said:

דף לב,ב גמרא

in words of both ??? life, a law established by the Torah And even if Rabbi Shimon he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: except It is because of this: that is not ??? but: ??? is a kal vachomer It is because of this: Is this not It is because of this: ??? life, ??? Perhaps It is because of this: That there are its lack a purse This is what he means: for just as ??? of it its lack a purse he is liable ??? for there is of it its lack a purse not all the more so? ??? there is not there its lack a purse Are we are not dealing ??? So, too, here, ??? So, too, they came they steal ??? all Just as That there are ??? Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? life, a law established by the Torah it is taught at the end R' Yosi the Gallilean says if he was upon it ??? yes. ??? to him as it is said (Ex. 23) under ??? that it is possible to stand in it Is this not from this general principle it would follow of the first tanna? reasoned ??? to him What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: ??? life, a law established by the Torah Perhaps ??? of R' Yosi reasoned ??? under ??? that it is possible to stand in it And the rabbbis reason that No. ??? under ??? Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? life, Is this not a law established by the Torah where he teaches But the beginning of the teaching, he has walked and he sat to him and he said to him Because upon you a commandment ??? is exempt as it is said with it and if You might have thought ??? life, a law established by the Torah What do I have to learn from ??? and What do I have to learn from For ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? life, a law established by the Torah Who deduces is exempt is exempt ??? and Perhaps is exempt ??? he is liable For a payment This is what he means: the Merciful One For ??? a slave ??? And so ??? a slave ??? For a payment And really ??? life, a law established by the Torah ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? of it ??? Israel If you say, This is satisfactory ??? life, a law established by the Torah It is because of this: thus ??? of it ??? Israel except If you say, ??? life, Is this not a law established by the Torah why is it that ??? of it ??? Israel there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? Here, too, ??? where he teaches if it was require wine ??? yes. ??? to it If you say, This is satisfactory Is this not a law established by the Torah It is because of this: thus yes. ??? to it except If you say, a law established by the Torah why is it that yes. ??? to it This is what he means: ??? wine ??? yes. ??? to it Come and hear: ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? Israel ??? And if you say ??? life, a law established by the Torah why is it that ??? he had asked for him In reality lit: In the world ??? life, a law established by the Torah there i.e., in another mishna ??? If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? Israel ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? and if ??? why is it that ??? It is because of this: ??? of Israel If so, even But the beginning of the teaching, also But the beginning of the teaching, ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile at the end of the teaching, ??? Israel What then does it mean when it says ??? according to ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he ??? He said to him So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean She for he said: ??? life, Is this not a law established by the Torah Come and hear: loves ??? to claim a commandment ??? so that ??? ??? and if You might have thought ??? life, a law established by the Torah this one is preferable for him Watch out for leading vav But nevertheless, so that ??? ??? is preferable Come and hear: ??? where they said ??? Israel and not ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile If you say, ??? life, a law established by the Torah What do I have to learn from ??? Israel and What do I have to learn from ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile Who deduces ??? he arises ??? he arises Come and hear:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.