It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לו,א גמרא

occasions ??? occasions ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? occasions ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, How so? ??? money or property a guilt-offering ??? A sin-offering occasions ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, For example, ??? And they said she was raped ??? thus in the same way or whether like that ??? is exempt the case is that of a sin-offering, he asks ??? thus in the same way or whether like that ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, occasions ??? For example, ??? And they said ??? work ??? for it is the case that ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, he asks ??? For example, ??? And they said ??? work ??? thus in the same way or whether like that ??? is exempt he is liable the case is that of a sin-offering, he asks ??? he exempted ??? work ??? he asks the case is that of a sin-offering, For example, ??? And they said ??? he ??? a lost item ??? he exempted ??? he asks ??? thus in the same way or whether like that ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, And what can we come and learn from this? To exclude from that of Rabbi Ami for he said: all ??? it yes. we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? as it is said (Lev. 5) or ??? For ??? For ??? Come and learn from this. that is not ??? Ami was it said; ??? Rav said: is exempt And R' Yochanan said: he is liable Abayye said: with his reasoning of Rav No. -- why must that case be taught as well? ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for ??? except even ??? the reward for ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? is exempt What is the reason? for it is the case that ??? the understanding of and with his reasoning of R' Yochanan No. ??? the reward for ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? except Even if ??? the reward for ??? he is liable ??? yes. ??? that it should be ??? in the hand of after Rav Chisdah said this one of Rav Is this not in a clarifying explanation was it said; except from a derivation ??? day are they, ??? day one ??? to join with the body of one ??? "Hear!" ??? among ??? He went ??? and he came ??? he came in front of Rav ??? one that he saw reasoned It is because of this: ??? is exempt and not She It is different there in that case ??? day also we do not have ??? are they, ??? them ??? R' Ami and he said to it about this teaching ??? R' Abba -- son of ??? to R' Ami ??? a cow from his fellow ??? after ??? shall vow ??? must make restitution ??? and if ??? Let us say, for him yes. ??? that it should be ??? in the hand of after He said to him Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? to him ??? If so, ??? he is required ??? for him ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? coins next to his fellow ??? behind him ??? for his son or his daughter who were minors ??? that did not have ??? he is liable that did not have waited lit: watched like the way ??? The reason is ??? this one ??? is exempt why is it that Let him say for him yes. ??? that it should be ??? in the hand of after Rabba said: all ???

דף לו,ב גמרא

on the understanding of his wife and his children he ??? They said: ??? also where he teaches or ??? for his son or his daughter who were minors he is liable this one for his son ??? who were adults is exempt from this general principle it would follow ??? there is no difference ??? and there is no difference children he is liable ??? thus Let the Tanna teach: children ??? Learn from this Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? he is liable No. -- why must that case be taught as well? ??? the reward for ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? except even ??? although we don't deserve it. ??? the reward for he is liable What is the reason? for he said: for him ??? for me ??? No. ??? for me ??? was it said; ??? of it and was it taken out ??? Abaye in the name of Rabbah he said he is liable Raba in the name of Rabbah he said is exempt Abaye in the name of Rabbah he said he is liable all ??? that is not ??? For This judgement Is this not ??? he No. -- why must that case be taught as well? ??? he is liable ??? except even ??? is exempt Here in this case, he is liable What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? Raba in the name of Rabbah he said is exempt all ??? that is not ??? For This judgement Is this not ??? he No. ??? is exempt this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper except even ??? he is liable Here in this case, is exempt What is the reason? ??? the angel of death What do I have to learn from Here in this case, and What do I have to learn from there i.e., in another mishna and he would acknowledge the correct position of Abaye For if it was ??? my heart ??? this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper What is the reason מאי טעמא for it is the case that ??? to it there is not in this case. to say ??? and he would acknowledge the correct position of Raba all in a case ??? among ??? What is the reason? For if it was ??? the angel of death ??? it was. ??? Abaye said to him: to Raba ??? that you said the angel of death What do I have to learn from Here in this case, and What do I have to learn from there i.e., in another mishna This ??? R' Abba -- son of ??? to Rabbi Ami and a second person for him ??? to him ??? is a voluntary act ??? and let us say, for him the angel of death What do I have to learn from Here in this case, and What do I have to learn from there i.e., in another mishna He said to him ??? yes. ??? that it should be ??? in the hand of after that it is possible ??? To me ??? for me ??? No. ??? for me ??? there is not in this case. ??? A general principle: He challenged this "He" meaning... pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama raised up ??? "She has fallen yes. this compulsion he is liable this one ??? Behold! this compulsion but exempt him But why? Let us say, for him ??? So, too, ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? oil and it is good If so, "She has fallen also that he was to him ??? and not ??? If so, I would say But the beginning of the teaching, is credited lit, rises ??? "She has fallen Behold! this compulsion It was necessary for him ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? and is credited lit, rises ??? he said Rabbi Yosei How so? ??? makes ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi He said to him: Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah of Rav Yehudah is what you say? Do you really mean that? to us in the name of Shmuel ??? he was Rabbi Yosei

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.